So if you've become bored with it, could it be that you haven't thought it completely through?
Giving the Police the ability to Fire Bomb a house and not be held accountable is a dangerous precedent that should not be set.
No it's that I have COMPLETELY thought it through, i know exactly what I'm saying and state FACT....and i'm bored indulging these half baked arguments based on nonsense like cops being fired upon isn't dangerous ....troll on
I thought the police ID'd him... he fired 15 rounds but didn't hit them...then he ran to the cabin and they chased him, at which point he was quicker.I thought their best course of action - against a guy with rifles, etc - was to follow and radio it in. why in the world there were two of them creeping up around the cabin is beyone me
So it seems the conflict is whether the deliberate use of fire is ok. If this person was shooting, then deadly force, itself, was obviously green-lighted.If the person was positioned so his bullets had a path toward the cops, then he would be positioned in such a way to be taken out, which is what the story says happened to him by sniper.
Adonis never disappoints
Well, that's what I'm here for... If the officers radioed it in.. then sat in their patrol cars all nice and safe a distance away, Dormer might not just stop at the first place he came across. He might try and escape. Cabin has at least 4 corners... it was their job to try and keep him from getting away and likely murdering more people. It's a sucky job but somebody has to step away from the keyboard every once in awhile and do it.
dont worry groink, I suspect that jack t is a conspiracy theorist who cannot possibly accept rational explanations, they think that they "know" whats "really going on" because it elevates them from their normal failed humdrum existence's
Fuck off, you skinny queer. You've got enough enemies as it is.
So why do you think I said this:You're so fucking bored, you aren't even reading the very thread you're fighting in.
Epic response, true getbigger style.
They get paid to do it. Why complain?
I saw that.. i wasresponding to your 12 other posts directed at me where you try and say there was no danger.listen, it'spretty obvious at this point you are just asking loaded questions and will just move the goalposts as needed, I have no interest.
I didn't hear of any officers complaining, I hear them yelling saying "burn motherfucker"
Right, but Mr. Agnostic called the job sucky and that "someone has to do it", so I felt like it was best to remind him that they are actually getting paid for it and it was always part of the job description. If they wanted a job delivering Pizzas, they should have gotten a job delivering Pizzas.
Responding to the situation in such a way would strongly suggest that there was a desire for the situation to occur. So you can see how easily suspicions would arise.
of course it would. it would behoove an intelligent individual to not get sucked into the hyperbole and look at things as they really occured and in the proper context.EG...the cop who said that was watching the house burn minutes after the fire started and nothing to do with setting it. it was an emotional outburst, completely normal given the situation.