Wow, this is something else! What would be the difference to an over antagonized female fighter? I fought MMA way before I ever took a supplement (age 18-20 you can look it up), luckily never ran into a woman with such dispositions, but yet, I would feel if I lost to a born "male" fighting in a female league, surgery, hormones, whatever, I would be against the loss and try to fight the legality. (this is my opinion only)
I would be angry for she definitely has an unfair advantage, no matter what she says about the two-year hormone level balance. I don't agree with the winning before she came "out"-- However, IFC, UFC, and other federations of the sort, are similar to the IFBB in that they truly do not test for hormones, she should legally keep her belts and continue to fight. (study of legality, not my opinion)
If a female fighter knows her next fight is with a transgender, would that make her more likely to experiment with steroids to find a fair playing field? Causing to the Domino Theory? I think this is an ethical disaster, and truly immoral to fight without truth. Steroids/hormones are one thing, but cutting off your twig and berries- is another. She said it herself she was playing "devils advocate." She knows her time fighting without truth was in fact wrong. Like I said, if I saw her in the ring before me in my days of fighting, I would be angry to lose to a born male, I'd be happy to kick her ass though. She is really pretty which is cool, but the ethical nature of this case, makes me say she is not due her championships prior to "coming out"--
Legally okay, ethically wrong.