It is becoming apparent that you are nothing more than a blowhard with a stupid avatar.
What is, also, becoming apparent is that your reading comprehension is somewhere between "READING? BWHA... WHAT'S THAT?" and "I HAVE PUTRID FECES WHERE OTHER HAVE A BRAIN. I CAN'T READ AT ALL!". Excellent skill in judging avatars though!
First you argued that inconclusive DNA evidence trumps eye witness testimony, Zimmermans injuries and the testimony of the police.
Except, well, that's not what I argued in my posts about the DNA evidence or here for that matter. I'm really not sure if you are just a dishonest prick or just plain fucking stupid. Let's just give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are neither, but just suffered some sort of mini-meltdown while you were typing you response. In which case my response is:
I argued that the evidence presented about the lack of DNA can't be summarily dismissed; fights as brutal as what we are led to believe occurred invariably result in a lot of forensic evidence left on the attacker and the victim. I also argued that eyewitnesses - even under ideal circumstances - aren't always reliable and that even their best, most honest recollection can be severely flawed.
Now tell me... which of these positions do you suggest is wrong or inaccurate?
On to the more general topic of the evidence presented, I think that the evidence
suggests that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin after an altercation in which Zimmerman was very likely afraid for his life - regardless of whether that fear was rational. I believe that both of them were responsible for escalating the situation but that Zimmerman
stupidly started it. I don't think he deserves jail or to be convicted of murder or even manslaughter for being stupid however.
As far as I'm concerned, the prosecution didn't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt - and that means a walk in my book. But as I said, I'm not empaneled.
Now, the forensics presented at the trial don't tell the story you like, so now that's basically become irrelevant also.
First of all, there's no "story I like." I have no particular interest in the outcome of the case, nor do I really care one way or another. As far as I'm concerned, Zimmerman was stupid to pursue someone he thought might be out looking for trouble and the Martin kid was stupid for not rushing home or calling the Police on his phone upon realizing that someone was after him. Both made stupid decisions that night, and when you put that much stupid together bad shit tends to happen.
But who am I to try and school you on what stupid people do? It is a topic on which you are, undoubtedly, an expert.
Bravo. The only thing that matters in any murder trial is what the jury thinks. You could have saved the board some bandwith and called it a day by simply responding that you want Zimmerman to be convicted of murder at all costs-- facts be damned.
Except, you know... I don't. That you
think I do is irrelevant. And please note, I use the term "think" loosely.
But if you want to save the board bandwidth then how about you quit posting? Besides reducing bandwidth usage, you'd also help raise the average IQ on here by at least half a dozen points. Two birds with one stone and all that jazz.
