Wow.
even if you completely ignore the fact that she lied om the stand (not even counting the other lies she came out with off the stand)
a.she wasnt there
b.she has a reason to lie as well. Maybe not as much as zimmerman, but the word of a gf that wasnt even present is not substantial evidence.
Why do you try and discredit Zimmerman for being a known lier but are totally trying to make Jabbas testimony credible when she is just as much of a proven liar?? I mean, make up your mind bro.
she was on the phone with him during the time that Zimmerman was following Martin and at the time the altercation started
I've looked at her lies and her motivation for both and they are inconsequential
If the letter was not her words then that would be a completely different story. If she dictated a letter to a friend than that's her letter even if she didn't personally write it. I'm not ignoring the rest of her testimony and I doubt the jury is either
Zimmerman lied about material facts and I don't consider a lie about why she didn't attend Martins wake to be a material fact. If in fact the content of the letter are not her words then I would consider that a material fact as well. Her little lies were to avoid shame/embarrassment and not to be deceptive about material facts IMO