I know but next to the Oak, he's not even a sapling. Louie was 3 inches taller than Arnold and still couldn't match him. Haney is okay, but I don't think he is anywhere near prime Arnold. Being a "midget" isn't just about being shorter in terms of height. Compared to Arnie, he does indeed come up short in more ways than one.
And he's fugly. Really fugly. Zane and Nubret are vastly superior in looks and Steve Reeves makes Haney look even fuglier. Like I said, I think Joe Weider was trying to belittle Arnold who had surpassed Weider as far as influence goes, by giving Haney 8 Olympia wins. It didn't work.
To be technically, Lee Haney was 5'11.5" and Arnold was 6'1.5" - so...two inches in height difference between them.
I thought the consensus would be that Lee Haney's best beats Arnold's best, but I guess I never really spent any time researching that question. I do think that Lee had a level of size ahead of Arnold - I think Lee was both two inches shorter, and 10-lb heavier, which would make for a noteworthy bit of added muscle. And it's not like Lee was known for his waist being large or anything like that. I am certain that Arnold - in his best shape - would have been competitive well into the 1980's...but towards the end of Lee's tenure, I'm less certain of.
I don't know, Scott...I'd give that one to Lee Haney myself. It would depend on the year though. Arnold's best could have beaten Lee's best in Lee's earlier wins, but I'm less certain about his later ones.
I agree with you about their looks.

That's an interesting theory about Arnold's influence surpassing that of Joe Weider. I hadn't thought of that. Someone said that Arnold purposely didn't make the Arnold Classic prize money more than the Mr. Olympia, out of respect for Joe Weider. I have no idea if that is actually true or not, though.