Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
September 03, 2014, 12:09:54 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rubio: if gay couple amendment included in immigration bill "I'm Done"  (Read 211 times)
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8393


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« on: June 13, 2013, 10:14:20 AM »

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/rubio-m-done-immigration-bill-includes-gay-couple-160223193.html


 Roll Eyes

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8393


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2013, 11:27:48 AM »

From NRO:

“The Senate has rejected an amendment to the Gang of Eight bill calling for a “border security first” approach to immigration reform...The measure would have required the Department of Homeland Security to demonstarate effective security of the southern border for six months before illegal immigration are granted legal status...

The Republican members of the Gang of Eight — senators John McCain (Ariz.), Marco Rubio (Fla.), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), and Lindsey Graham (S.C.) – and Republican senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska joined with the Democrats to block the amendment.”






Rubio is a liar and a fraud
Report to moderator   Logged
chadstallion
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2398



« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2013, 01:21:37 PM »

yes!
two wins....
get the gay amendment
get rid of Rubio.

win win for everyone!
Report to moderator   Logged

240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 82794


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2013, 01:46:45 PM »

Rubio decided last year to become mcCain II.   He's been VERY good at it lol...
Report to moderator   Logged

GigantorX
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5463


GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!


« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2013, 01:47:23 PM »

Rubio decided last year to become mcCain II.   He's been VERY good at it lol...

That means no pres for him.
Report to moderator   Logged
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 82794


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2013, 01:50:10 PM »

That means no pres for him.

maybe... repubs seem to make a lot of noise about choosing far-right... then they choose a moderate.

If you were a betting man... would you bet on ither Rinos (rubio or christie) or "rest of field" winning the nomination in 2016? 

I'm convinced repubs will clap for tea party Rand for 2 years... then promptly vote for one of these 2 RINOS when Hannity/Rush tell them the RINOS are the only "viable" options lol...
Report to moderator   Logged

Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11393

Team Shizzo


« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2013, 01:59:32 PM »

The gay spouse thing wouldn't work for several reasons.  It is far to broad and intrusive. First gay civil unions aren't recognized by the federal government. Such an amendment would be a defacto endorsement of gay marriage and in contradiction to DOMA.

Secondly, if such an amendment were to pass, it would usurp states rights by recognizing gay unions in states which currently do not.  It also grants rights to immigrants which gay citizens in many states do not currently have.  A lot of lawsuits would be sure to follow.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21036


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2013, 03:35:26 PM »

Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!