Ok, so if Zimmerman were attacked in his car and not outside, you would be supporting Zimmerman right now? Is this correct?
Its the whole car thing that has you bent out of shape. The same EXACT incident would have you supporting Zimmerman had he been in closer proximity to the car or in the vehicle itself. So therefore you recognize that Zimmerman was protecting himself, just not in his car when being attacked and therefore you think he should be found guilty, despite the incident being the same, car or not?
On the street, it was two men - one chased another.
In the car/home, it's very clear cut. Trayvon can climb in his window, surrender and beg for mercy and be coldly executed - legally.
I've been very clear that zimmerman was PROBABLY just defending himself and the shoot itself was legal.
The only problem is that zimmerman did everything he could to CREATE a lethal showdown. He got out with a gun to chase down a person he claimed was on drugs and possibly armed - what other possible outcome did he expect? Zero common sense, or lust for trigger time.
Trayvon reaches inside that truck window, it's lights out, POW, totally legal.
