Author Topic: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012  (Read 9383 times)

Trapper_Slapper

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • Clean and Jerks pull the bitches!
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2013, 07:34:47 AM »
Yeah even if someone dug up a few of those freshly retired Coleman pics at expos standing next to a competitive Heath, retired Coleman STiLL dwarfed Heath.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2013, 09:47:03 AM »






Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29903
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2013, 09:47:35 AM »
A symbolic, Side-by-Side comparison of Ronnie vs Phil; in "word form"


***[[[[[[[[[[R-O-N-N-I-E]]]]]]]]]]***     phil

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2013, 10:31:24 AM »
Dorian would wax them both if the same time period and has beat Ronnie before of course, Ronnie took over his crown. Ronnie given same time period would wax Heat.


GraniteCityDon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1555
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #29 on: September 24, 2013, 10:39:40 AM »
not its not, not phil and ronnie had very similar weights during their peak years, fact.

Ronnie is taller and his dimensions, including arms, absolutely dominated anything Heath has produced. I dont care if Ronnie was weighing 245lbs, he was just so much bigger than Heath in every department (no homo!).

D_1000

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #30 on: September 24, 2013, 10:47:34 AM »
Ronnie was on a completely different, superior, level.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40777
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #31 on: September 24, 2013, 11:56:00 AM »
Phil is a recessive version of Ronnie.
7

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #32 on: September 24, 2013, 12:00:20 PM »
Ronnie > phil

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #33 on: September 24, 2013, 12:14:55 PM »
They weighted very close in those years right? So I assume their physiques are very comparable as well.

And if you are going to say Ronnie totally smoked Phil, be prepared back it up with mandatory comparison pics, thanks.

Edit: here is a comparison with a 2004 (?) Coleman. Clearely bigger but also much less detail so Im not sure he would win.



I think this BDB is closer than most of you are willing to admit. Strictly going by the photo, Phil's back looks a little more detailed, might even have the edge.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78898
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #34 on: September 24, 2013, 12:32:34 PM »
I think this BDB is closer than most of you are willing to admit. Strictly going by the photo, Phil's back looks a little more detailed, might even have the edge.

It's NOT close






























Phil is beating that version of Ronnie easily ,  but wouldn't beat Ronnie at his best

johnnyx

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2013, 01:16:42 PM »


Since the picture has them at the same height/size Phil looks comparable but with height/size adjusted to real life, Ronnie wins.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15196
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2013, 01:58:03 PM »
It really is a shame when people forget how incredible Ronnie really was.

GraniteCityDon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1555
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2013, 02:44:21 PM »

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #38 on: September 24, 2013, 03:07:29 PM »
Unlike Ronnie, Phil doesn't should like he has a mouth full of marbles when he speaks.   

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #39 on: September 24, 2013, 03:11:23 PM »
Unlike Ronnie, Phil doesn't should like he has a mouth full of marbles when he speaks.   
women love a big southern church going black man

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40777
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #40 on: September 24, 2013, 03:14:52 PM »
women love a big southern church going black man


hahahahaha ;D
7

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2013, 03:18:08 PM »
Ronnie 8 time mr O
real muscle
wide and thick, shape symmetry and conditioning

Phil- Narrow
soft blow up doll muscle

Phil couldnt carry Ronnies jockstrap

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78898
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #42 on: September 24, 2013, 03:19:09 PM »
Ronnie 8 time mr O
real muscle
wide and thick, shape symmetry and conditioning

Phil- Narrow
soft blow up doll muscle

Phil couldnt carry Ronnies jockstrap

 >:(

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #43 on: September 24, 2013, 03:19:42 PM »

hahahahaha ;D
a perfect combination of diabolical monster cocks, family values, big mascular presence and friendly accent

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #44 on: September 24, 2013, 04:10:06 PM »
They weighted very close in those years right? So I assume their physiques are very comparable as well.

And if you are going to say Ronnie totally smoked Phil, be prepared back it up with mandatory comparison pics, thanks.

Edit: here is a comparison with a 2004 (?) Coleman. Clearely bigger but also much less detail so Im not sure he would win.


pretty sure thats Ronnie from 2003 and not 1998, he's too big. And the pic isnt close to scale lol, dumbass.
follow the arrows

beakdoctor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6328
  • Cruising on caffeine and blasting with melatonin
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #45 on: September 24, 2013, 04:17:59 PM »
 The only thing that comes close to a prime Ronnie is a prime Dorian and even that isn't close either. Ronnie was a freak of nature. It boggles the mind that people debate this.

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #46 on: September 24, 2013, 05:06:37 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78898
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #47 on: September 24, 2013, 05:38:44 PM »
Not a good pose for either.

I agree but Ronnie's is better than Phils

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #48 on: September 24, 2013, 05:45:02 PM »
I agree but Ronnie's is better than Phils

I would agree, too. But that's Dorian's pose, without question. I'm sure you agree.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78898
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie 1998 vs Phil 2012
« Reply #49 on: September 24, 2013, 05:48:28 PM »
I would agree, too. But that's Dorian's pose, without question. I'm sure you agree.

Absolutely , then Rhul than Haney