Obama - "Im really good at killing people".

[Soul Crusher]

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/last-president-obama-reportedly-told-024401509.html


Nobel peace prize winner

[Soul Crusher]

We have a sadistic murderer in the WH

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/last-president-obama-reportedly-told-024401509.html


Nobel peace prize winner

He's killing terrorists....so what

[LurkerNoMore]

He has been killing you every moment of the day 24/7 since 2008.

[Soul Crusher]

He's killing terrorists....so what

Idiot.    Do you even read anything.   More civilians have been killed thsn terrorists in these drone strikes

[Skip8282]

Idiot.    Do you even read anything.   More civilians have been killed thsn terrorists in these drone strikes

Libs only consider that a bad thing when Bush was doing it.

I'm surprised Obama is even aware of it.  He doesn't seem to be aware of just about anything going on his administration.

[Mr.1derful]

He's killing terrorists....so what

How about the thousands of innocent civilians killed?  By the way, who makes the determination and based on what, to summarily label someone as a "terrorist" to kill them without any evidence or due process?  Land of the free, home of the assassin.

[tonymctones]

Libs only consider that a bad thing when Bush was doing it.

I'm surprised Obama is even aware of it.  He doesn't seem to be aware of just about anything going on his administration.

TRUTH

[240 is Back]

Idiot.    Do you even read anything.   More civilians have been killed thsn terrorists in these drone strikes

I'm confused.  You'd celebrate loudly if a nuke went off on US soil... ignoring the loss of american life because, well, the people you dislike in DC would be gone.  Your quote:

If a nuke went off in DC and took out all of these criminals and traitors, I would celebrate loudly. 

But you're throwing a fit because (far fewer) foreigner "bystanders" are killed while we use strikes to kill terr'ists?

So you care about minimal loss of foreign lives, but you'd celebrate loudly if millions of americans died?  Damn, that's cold, man. 

[Soul Crusher]

I'm confused.  You'd celebrate loudly if a nuke went off on US soil... ignoring the loss of american life because, well, the people you dislike in DC would be gone.  Your quote:

But you're throwing a fit because (far fewer) foreigner "bystanders" are killed while we use strikes to kill terr'ists?

So you care about minimal loss of foreign lives, but you'd celebrate loudly if millions of americans died?  Damn, that's cold, man. 

The inn ocent  people dead in obama drone strikes mever did shit to me.   Obama and the other communists you have defended for years are directly collapsing this country.  IntentionLly too.  Big differmce.

[240 is Back]

The inn ocent  people dead in obama drone strikes mever did shit to me.   Obama and the other communists you have defended for years are directly collapsing this country.  IntentionLly too.  Big differmce.

And the innocent people living around DC would have done nothing to you.  When nukes go off, they dont' target the exact people you hate.  They kill millions.  I'm sure at least one non-Obama-voter, child, etc would perish in the radiation fallout.

Do you still feel this way, or have you changed positions over the year?  Would you no longer laugh if a nuke went off on american soil, 33/soul crusher?

[Soul Crusher]

Sure. 

[240 is Back]

See, 33, I thought you were the type that was all about "kill those you hate, and any incidental loss of life is okay".

I was literally shocked to see you yelling about people in Iraq or Pakistan getting killed as we take out bad guys.  When these terr'ists hide out among civilians, it's terrible, but it happens.  

Were you also angered by the strikes that took place under previous presidents?  Would you rather US soldiers be on the ground getting hit with RPGs, or a few innocents get killed because they're hanging with a murdering terrist?  Come to think of it, why don't these people hanging out with the terr'ists take a knife to his throat when he goes to sleep?  Why not turn them in?   How many "innocents" are part of the support team for them, we just haven't ID'd them?  if one terr'ist is hiding out among 30 "innocents" and 5 or 10 of these innocents happen to carry guns, and they KNOW the terr'ist has drones searching for him... why not cap him, collect a reward?  Why keep on enabling him?

[Soul Crusher]

By all accounts the drone strikes hae only created more militants and hatred of the us.

[240 is Back]

Sure.  

sure, you've changed positions?  Cause I'd admire that, dude.  I dont think anyone should celebrate if a nuke happens here.  I still think maybe you were just kidding about that quote, but online, it's hard to tell sarcasm.

[240 is Back]

By all accounts the drone strikes hae only created more militants and hatred of the us.

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with "what they think of us".   It's been 12 years of war.  Almost an entire generation by the fast breeding patterns in many regions over there... they don't exactly wait til they're 30 like americans seem to be doing this days.

I could never just say "we gotta let so-and-so go because people are going to get mad if we drone strike him", then order 100 US troops into the area for a massive gunfight with a bunch of suicidal zealots who have been begging for such a battle to make their stand.  Could you?

Id' be MUCH more concerned with telling some mother that her child and 5 like him was killed in gun battle with a bad guy we could have iced from Tampa with the push of a button.  Yes, some people who had been "nearby" him for a month were killed, but really, without them feeding, hiding, communicating for him - is he even effective as a terrorist?

[Soul Crusher]

Obama is like Papa Doc

[Archer77]

Obama needs to up his game and start killing more terrorists instead of providing them with funding and weapons.

[Skip8282]

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with "what they think of us".   It's been 12 years of war.  Almost an entire generation by the fast breeding patterns in many regions over there... they don't exactly wait til they're 30 like americans seem to be doing this days.

I could never just say "we gotta let so-and-so go because people are going to get mad if we drone strike him", then order 100 US troops into the area for a massive gunfight with a bunch of suicidal zealots who have been begging for such a battle to make their stand.  Could you?

Id' be MUCH more concerned with telling some mother that her child and 5 like him was killed in gun battle with a bad guy we could have iced from Tampa with the push of a button.  Yes, some people who had been "nearby" him for a month were killed, but really, without them feeding, hiding, communicating for him - is he even effective as a terrorist?

You're so full of shit.

When Bush was in, you were arguing the drone strikes were bad because they caused more terrorism.

And you were endlessly crying about Gitmo.

Don't see you starting shit about Gitmo these days since your Messiah is in office.

[tonymctones]

You're so full of shit.

When Bush was in, you were arguing the drone strikes were bad because they caused more terrorism.

And you were endlessly crying about Gitmo.

Don't see you starting shit about Gitmo these days since your Messiah is in office.

yup he was on here arguing we were creating more terrorist, but I guess his view has "evovled"

[240 is Back]

after you've been in a region for a generation, it's part of the culture now. 

And they're not IDEAL, but I'll choose them over US troops getting shot at, any day of the week.  Always preferable is a single sniper shot from a quarter mile.

[tonymctones]

after you've been in a region for a generation, it's part of the culture now. 

And they're not IDEAL, but I'll choose them over US troops getting shot at, any day of the week.  Always preferable is a single sniper shot from a quarter mile.

so you were against them under bush but are now for them?

even though the reason you were against them is still there?

[240 is Back]

i'm against them if the sniper option is available.

[Dago_Joe]

Doesn't matter what Hussein Obummer says, libfags will defend him to the death not matter what.  He could go live on tv and cut a baby's head off and libtards would do one of two things:  praise him for his courage or blame George Bush.
The man can do no wrong in libtwinks eyes.  He is perfection in every way and anyone who questions him is a racist. 

[anabolichalo]

lol @ thinking any of you are going to change anything


why bother following the "news"