Author Topic: Ronnie Rockel  (Read 6726 times)

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #25 on: January 05, 2006, 05:13:57 AM »
In the old days he would have made an impact, but in the age of mass monsters he doesn't register.  :(

Just ask Darrem. He's always been more ripped than the top 6 in the Mr. Olympia for years now
I am a mini beast

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #26 on: January 05, 2006, 06:09:57 AM »
  Who gives a shit? This guy obviously doesen't have the genetics, to win anything at the pro level.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

de Rooij

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #27 on: January 05, 2006, 06:27:13 AM »
  Who gives a shit? This guy obviously doesen't have the genetics, to win anything at the pro level.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

You obviously have the genetics to be a no-name internet loser/hater!

WiseGuy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2015
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #28 on: January 05, 2006, 08:46:24 AM »
Like I said, a small fry (relatively speaking, of course).  Great shape and conditioning though.  :)

exactly this guy has great shape, symmentry and genetics and keeps getting overlooked...

 >:(

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #29 on: January 05, 2006, 04:38:04 PM »
  Who gives a shit? This guy obviously doesen't have the genetics, to win anything at the pro level.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I think that's actually a compliment nowadays...  :-\
Team Nasser!

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #30 on: January 05, 2006, 05:42:15 PM »
  Who gives a shit? This guy obviously doesen't have the genetics, to win anything at the pro level.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
are you looking at the same pics I'm lookin at?!!
And look back at the australian pro pics, IMO he beat botyh cormier and priest.
follow the arrows

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #31 on: January 05, 2006, 11:57:51 PM »
You obviously have the genetics to be a no-name internet loser/hater!

  While you, on the other hand, lack the genetic potential to be witty. Wet your lips with my spooge, cun t.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #32 on: January 06, 2006, 12:16:32 AM »
  While you, on the other hand, lack the genetic potential to be witty. Wet your lips with my spooge, cun t.

SUCKMYMUSCLE



wrong! i thought it was funny!  ;)
besides, why do you waste your time in this thread. there are numerous threads on ronnie and dorian where you can hang out. i sense you're more into the pregnant look in body builders.  :-\
Team Nasser!

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #33 on: January 06, 2006, 12:34:43 AM »
wrong! i thought it was funny!  ;)
besides, why do you waste your time in this thread. there are numerous threads on ronnie and dorian where you can hang out. i sense you're more into the pregnant look in body builders.  :-\

  Who cares what you think, newbie? I've got plenty of spooge; join that other cun t and wet your lips with it.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Dan-O

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9729
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #34 on: January 06, 2006, 12:35:51 AM »
Rockel is like the Zane or Labrada of this era.  No weak points to speak of, decent size, near-perfect balance and symmetry and great conditioning--in other words, all the right stuff that bodybuilding USED to be about.

And he didn't even make the top 15 in the 05 Olympia.

The Olympia judges really had their heads up their asses and they should have to account for their decisions but apparently they can call it any way they damn well please with impunity.

Zack made some good points.  In many cases the current group of judges seem to be muscle worshippers rewarding sheer mass above the ideal combination of size, condition, aesthetics and overall balance.

asiansensation

  • Pros
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 401
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #35 on: January 06, 2006, 10:14:57 AM »
When Ronnie turns to the back he does not look as good. Also he is quite narrow. The good thing is that he always come in condition. Still he is good for a top 15 at the O though! ;)

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #36 on: January 06, 2006, 10:17:33 AM »
  Who cares what you think, newbie? I've got plenty of spooge; join that other cun t and wet your lips with it.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

 ::)
Team Nasser!

Danny

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4630
  • The original Superman
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #37 on: January 06, 2006, 11:59:19 AM »
Rockel is like the Zane or Labrada of this era.  No weak points to speak of, decent size, near-perfect balance and symmetry and great conditioning--in other words, all the right stuff that bodybuilding USED to be about.

And he didn't even make the top 15 in the 05 Olympia.

The Olympia judges really had their heads up their asses and they should have to account for their decisions but apparently they can call it any way they damn well please with impunity.

Zack made some good points.  In many cases the current group of judges seem to be muscle worshippers rewarding sheer mass above the ideal combination of size, condition, aesthetics and overall balance.

Otherwise they would not place an out of shape Markus Ruhl above Rockel...
"What we do in life ECHOES in eternity "

wordy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 625
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #38 on: January 06, 2006, 04:06:47 PM »
Gonna get ready for the flames.....

But I wouldn'tve complained if this guy won the O. he was in great condition,  asthetically pleasing physique, symetrical. and while smaller that some of the guys, he's still a big guy. and size should not be the olny determining factor of who wins

Just my opinion


Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #39 on: January 07, 2006, 11:45:25 PM »
Does anyone have his stats? age, weight, height, etc?
Team Nasser!

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #40 on: January 08, 2006, 05:11:58 AM »
Does anyone know when he will compete the next time? Man, looking at those olympia pictures again:  :o
I have to say it again: he got screwed big time!

maybe he liked getting screwed big time  :)

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19448
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #41 on: January 08, 2006, 05:18:09 AM »
maybe he like getting screwed big time  :)

I'd go there.  ;D

Prime

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • The force is strong in this'un
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #42 on: January 08, 2006, 05:53:57 AM »
Ronnie should be top 5 at the MR O he's what bb should be about.
[img]http://ima

Sumpa

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
  • GetHUGE!
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #43 on: January 08, 2006, 10:47:05 AM »
What's the major difference between Melvin and Ronnie? Is it size? Is it when they turn around? I don't think Ronnie looks worse than Melvin from the front... Melvin finished 7th and Ronnie 17th...  ???
Team Nasser!

Bossa

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2444
  • Is that Bossa it must be, I heard he husky
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #44 on: January 08, 2006, 11:16:17 AM »
What's the major difference between Melvin and Ronnie? Is it size? Is it when they turn around? I don't think Ronnie looks worse than Melvin from the front... Melvin finished 7th and Ronnie 17th...  ???


Well...Ronnie is shorter and his back isn't as good as melvins.  Other than that Ronnie looks better, better conditioning too.  But Melvin has been around longer and gets more press...


...And he has a reaaly fancy cape...

PANDAEMONIUM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6583
  • Scourge of the Northern Gods
Re: Ronnie Rockel
« Reply #45 on: September 29, 2007, 09:13:31 PM »
I think Rockel rocked tonight 8)