Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
August 31, 2014, 01:58:08 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup  (Read 1489 times)
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21036


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« on: December 15, 2013, 08:21:17 PM »

Read this

http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/

Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup
By Paul Sperry
December 15, 2013 | 5:13am

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.


It was kept secret and remains so today.

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

Some information already has leaked from the classified section, which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.

The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war.

The findings, if confirmed, would back up open-source reporting showing the hijackers had, at a minimum, ties to several Saudi officials and agents while they were preparing for their attacks inside the United States. In fact, they got help from Saudi VIPs from coast to coast:

LOS ANGELES: Saudi consulate official Fahad al-Thumairy allegedly arranged for an advance team to receive two of the Saudi hijackers — Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi — as they arrived at LAX in 2000. One of the advance men, Omar al-Bayoumi, a suspected Saudi intelligence agent, left the LA consulate and met the hijackers at a local restaurant. (Bayoumi left the United States two months before the attacks, while Thumairy was deported back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11.)

SAN DIEGO: Bayoumi and another suspected Saudi agent, Osama Bassnan, set up essentially a forward operating base in San Diego for the hijackers after leaving LA. They were provided rooms, rent and phones, as well as private meetings with an American al Qaeda cleric who would later become notorious, Anwar al-Awlaki, at a Saudi-funded mosque he ran in a nearby suburb. They were also feted at a welcoming party. (Bassnan also fled the United States just before the attacks.)

WASHINGTON: Then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar and his wife sent checks totaling some $130,000 to Bassnan while he was handling the hijackers. Though the Bandars claim the checks were “welfare” for Bassnan’s supposedly ill wife, the money nonetheless made its way into the hijackers’ hands.

Other al Qaeda funding was traced back to Bandar and his embassy — so much so that by 2004 Riggs Bank of Washington had dropped the Saudis as a client.


The next year, as a number of embassy employees popped up in terror probes, Riyadh recalled Bandar.

“Our investigations contributed to the ambassador’s departure,” an investigator who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in Washington told me, though Bandar says he left for “personal reasons.”

FALLS CHURCH, VA.: In 2001, Awlaki and the San Diego hijackers turned up together again — this time at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, a Pentagon-area mosque built with funds from the Saudi Embassy. Awlaki was recruited 3,000 miles away to head the mosque. As its imam, Awlaki helped the hijackers, who showed up at his doorstep as if on cue. He tasked a handler to help them acquire apartments and IDs before they attacked the Pentagon.

Awlaki worked closely with the Saudi Embassy. He lectured at a Saudi Islamic think tank in Merrifield, Va., chaired by Bandar. Saudi travel itinerary documents I’ve obtained show he also served as the ­official imam on Saudi Embassy-sponsored trips to Mecca and tours of Saudi holy sites.

Most suspiciously, though, Awlaki fled the United States on a Saudi jet about a year after 9/11.

As I first reported in my book, “Infiltration,” quoting from classified US documents, the Saudi-sponsored cleric was briefly detained at JFK before being released into the custody of a “Saudi representative.” A federal warrant for Awlaki’s arrest had mysteriously been withdrawn the previous day. A US drone killed Awlaki in Yemen in 2011.

HERNDON, VA.: On the eve of the attacks, top Saudi government official Saleh Hussayen checked into the same Marriott Residence Inn near Dulles Airport as three of the Saudi hijackers who targeted the Pentagon. Hussayen had left a nearby hotel to move into the hijackers’ hotel. Did he meet with them? The FBI never found out. They let him go after he “feigned a seizure,” one agent recalled. (Hussayen’s name doesn’t appear in the separate 9/11 Commission Report, which clears the Saudis.)

SARASOTA, FLA.: 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta and other hijackers visited a home owned by Esam Ghazzawi, a Saudi adviser to the nephew of King Fahd. FBI agents investigating the connection in 2002 found that visitor logs for the gated community and photos of license tags matched vehicles driven by the hijackers. Just two weeks before the 9/11 attacks, the Saudi luxury home was abandoned. Three cars, including a new Chrysler PT Cruiser, were left in the driveway. Inside, opulent furniture was untouched.

Democrat Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who chaired the Joint Inquiry, has asked the FBI for the Sarasota case files, but can’t get a single, even heavily redacted, page released. He says it’s a “coverup.”

Is the federal government protecting the Saudis? Case agents tell me they were repeatedly called off pursuing 9/11 leads back to the Saudi Embassy, which had curious sway over White House and FBI responses to the attacks.


Just days after Bush met with the Saudi ambassador in the White House, the FBI evacuated from the United States dozens of Saudi officials, as well as Osama bin Laden family members. Bandar made the request for escorts directly to FBI headquarters on Sept. 13, 2001 — just hours after he met with the president. The two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony while discussing the attacks.

Bill Doyle, who lost his son in the World Trade Center attacks and heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families, calls the suppression of Saudi evidence a “coverup beyond belief.” Last week, he sent out an e-mail to relatives urging them to phone their representatives in Congress to support the resolution and read for themselves the censored 28 pages.

Astonishing as that sounds, few lawmakers in fact have bothered to read the classified section of arguably the most important investigation in US history.

Granted, it’s not easy to do. It took a monthlong letter-writing campaign by Jones and Lynch to convince the House intelligence panel to give them access to the material.

But it’s critical they take the time to read it and pressure the White House to let all Americans read it. This isn’t water under the bridge. The information is still relevant ­today. Pursuing leads further, getting to the bottom of the foreign support, could help head off another 9/11.

As the frustrated Joint Inquiry authors warned, in an overlooked addendum to their heavily redacted 2002 report, “State-sponsored terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more ­lethal attacks within the United States.”

Their findings must be released, even if they forever change US-Saudi relations. If an oil-rich foreign power was capable of orchestrating simultaneous bulls-eye hits on our centers of commerce and defense a dozen years ago, it may be able to pull off similarly devastating attacks today.

Members of Congress reluctant to read the full report ought to remember that the 9/11 assault missed its fourth target: them.

Paul Sperry is a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of “Infiltration” and “Muslim Mafia.”



* Prince_Bandar_bin_Sultan_with_G.W._Bush.jpg (55.43 KB, 515x339 - viewed 185 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11387

Team Shizzo


« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2013, 08:24:56 PM »

Read this today.  I hope the story gets some traction.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24402


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2013, 08:48:51 PM »

The man the Bush family refers to as Bandar Bush.  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8371


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2013, 08:58:14 PM »

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/15/congressmen-move-to-declassify-key-part-of-911-report-that-they-say-could-indicate-hijackers-had-outside-help/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons


Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21036


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2013, 09:01:46 PM »

So why did we attack Iraq again? Huh
Report to moderator   Logged

24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24402


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2013, 09:32:14 PM »

So why did we attack Iraq again? Huh

Because the brutal and inhumane decades long sanctions did not work to topple Hussein. Despite the deaths of millions of innocent children, Hussein was still in charge, had survived the worst of it, and his country was still intact and would only get stronger since sanctions had come to an end. In order to quell both Israeli & Saudi fears that a secular Iraq could gain strength and influence across the Middle East, and to ensure Iraqi oil sales continued to occur in US Dollars thereby perpetuating the need for a currency nobody wants, Americans were fooled into supporting an illegal war of aggression in order to enrich war profiteers like Halliburton and their rich friends in the military industrial complex. Plus the govt needed a few more guinea pigs for their bio-tech research.

If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything, and a good portion of the American people did just that. They got you to believe absurdities, and from there it was no great stretch to get you to commit atrocities, ...and now your treasury has been pillaged, your bravest killed and maimed, your economy in shambles, your attempt at Empire lost, ...and you and your progeny shackled with debt for generations to come.

Karma is a biyatch!!
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21036


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2013, 09:55:56 PM »

Because the brutal and inhumane decades long sanctions did not work to topple Hussein. Despite the deaths of millions of innocent children, Hussein was still in charge, had survived the worst of it, and his country was still intact and would only get stronger since sanctions had come to an end. In order to quell both Israeli & Saudi fears that a secular Iraq could gain strength and influence across the Middle East, and to ensure Iraqi oil sales continued to occur in US Dollars thereby perpetuating the need for a currency nobody wants, Americans were fooled into supporting an illegal war of aggression in order to enrich war profiteers like Halliburton and their rich friends in the military industrial complex. Plus the govt needed a few more guinea pigs for their bio-tech research.

If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything, and a good portion of the American people did just that. They got you to believe absurdities, and from there it was no great stretch to get you to commit atrocities, ...and now your treasury has been pillaged, your bravest killed and maimed, your economy in shambles, your attempt at Empire lost, ...and you and your progeny shackled with debt for generations to come.

Karma is a biyatch!!

That makes sense, thank you!
Report to moderator   Logged

24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24402


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2013, 10:02:00 PM »

That makes sense, thank you!

You're welcome. I wasn't sure the truth would be appreciated, ...but that's never stopped me before.  Cheesy
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11387

Team Shizzo


« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2013, 10:22:18 PM »

That makes sense, thank you!

Don't encourage this person.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
E-Kul
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10363


Space: The final frontier


« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2013, 02:08:19 AM »

Because the brutal and inhumane decades long sanctions did not work to topple Hussein. Despite the deaths of millions of innocent children, Hussein was still in charge, had survived the worst of it, and his country was still intact and would only get stronger since sanctions had come to an end. In order to quell both Israeli & Saudi fears that a secular Iraq could gain strength and influence across the Middle East, and to ensure Iraqi oil sales continued to occur in US Dollars thereby perpetuating the need for a currency nobody wants, Americans were fooled into supporting an illegal war of aggression in order to enrich war profiteers like Halliburton and their rich friends in the military industrial complex. Plus the govt needed a few more guinea pigs for their bio-tech research.

If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything, and a good portion of the American people did just that. They got you to believe absurdities, and from there it was no great stretch to get you to commit atrocities, ...and now your treasury has been pillaged, your bravest killed and maimed, your economy in shambles, your attempt at Empire lost, ...and you and your progeny shackled with debt for generations to come.

Karma is a biyatch!!
We did also rid the world of some dirty stinking Muslims though, so it all balances out in the end !!!
Report to moderator   Logged

V
bears
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1716


« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2013, 08:50:38 AM »

wait a second.  I could have sworn that Rosie O'Donnell said it was a controlled detonation by GWB.  she was pretty sure too.
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2013, 10:37:14 AM »

wait a second.  I could have sworn that Rosie O'Donnell said it was a controlled detonation by GWB.  she was pretty sure too.

Yes, GWB was there to drop the plunger. He masterminded everything.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2013, 10:38:45 AM »

Read this today.  I hope the story gets some traction.

People may be engaged in conspiring, though, Archer. Are you sure you could handle the thought?
Report to moderator   Logged

Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8371


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #13 on: December 16, 2013, 10:39:06 AM »

Yes, GWB was there to drop the plunger. He masterminded everything.

Yeah - in 9 months he pulled this all off.   Roll Eyes
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #14 on: December 16, 2013, 10:44:42 AM »

Yeah - in 9 months he pulled this all off.   Roll Eyes

Reread the post if necessary, SC. Think before you go off. It's the best advice anyone could give you.
Report to moderator   Logged

Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8371


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2013, 10:47:47 AM »

Reread the post if necessary, SC. Think before you go off. It's the best advice anyone could give you.

The whole GWB is behind 9/11 is so ludicrous its not even funny.  Been down this rabitt hole too many times to name.  A CT involving GWB would have had to include hundreds of people playing the part.  And 13 years later not one person cracked or said a word?  GMAFB
Report to moderator   Logged
bears
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1716


« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2013, 10:59:59 AM »

The whole GWB is behind 9/11 is so ludicrous its not even funny.  Been down this rabitt hole too many times to name.  A CT involving GWB would have had to include hundreds of people playing the part.  And 13 years later not one person cracked or said a word?  GMAFB

he was being facetious
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2013, 11:03:34 AM »

The whole GWB is behind 9/11 is so ludicrous its not even funny.  Been down this rabitt hole too many times to name.  A CT involving GWB would have had to include hundreds of people playing the part.  And 13 years later not one person cracked or said a word?  GMAFB

If I make a very simple thread pertaining to 9/11 (on the CB, of course), to state a short, clear case for an inside job, will you enter it to debate? Because I don't recall EVER seeing you on any 9/11 thread.

(BTW: GWB is a privileged dummy of the sort that Americans should reject, and he further stupefied himself by abusing alcohol for decades. That's who GWB is.)
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2013, 11:08:15 AM »

he was being facetious

lol..SC is a good dude, but he jumps into action too quickly if he sees something he thinks he may not like.
Report to moderator   Logged

Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11387

Team Shizzo


« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2013, 11:10:58 AM »

People may be engaged in conspiring, though, Archer. Are you sure you could handle the thought?

I'm skeptical of everything, as all people should be, not just the issues I have an emotional stake in wanting to believe are true. I'm not attracted to conspiracy theories or the culture that surrounds it.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8371


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #20 on: December 16, 2013, 11:13:39 AM »

If I make a very simple thread pertaining to 9/11 (on the CB, of course), to state a short, clear case for an inside job, will you enter it to debate? Because I don't recall EVER seeing you on any 9/11 thread.

(BTW: GWB is a privileged dummy of the sort that Americans should reject, and he further stupefied himself by abusing alcohol for decades. That's who GWB is.)


Again - 12 years later not a single witness or person confessing or loose end slipping up?  Think about it.   
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #21 on: December 16, 2013, 11:16:42 AM »


Again - 12 years later not a single witness or person confessing or loose end slipping up?  Think about it.   

You are assuming hundreds or perhaps thousands of people, SC. Would that be true?
Report to moderator   Logged

Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8371


Doesnt lie about lifting.


« Reply #22 on: December 16, 2013, 11:23:00 AM »

You are assuming hundreds or perhaps thousands of people, SC. Would that be true?

At a minimum dozens.  And w even so few at 10 people in on it - someone always screws up - ALWAYS. 

This isn't Hollywood - its real life.   The same idiots who cant even get a website correct, a stim bill to create a single job, etc - are not at the same time capable of carrying this out wo a screw up. 
Report to moderator   Logged
bears
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1716


« Reply #23 on: December 16, 2013, 11:31:04 AM »

At a minimum dozens.  And w even so few at 10 people in on it - someone always screws up - ALWAYS. 

This isn't Hollywood - its real life.   The same idiots who cant even get a website correct, a stim bill to create a single job, etc - are not at the same time capable of carrying this out wo a screw up. 

at a minimum Biden, Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Harry Reid would have known about it and helped cover it up.  I've found that most CT'ers quit stating their case when you make them realize that there's no reasonable explanation for a lot of the people in the Obama administration not to have been complicit if what they're saying is true.

There's no way to realistically make it about the "Bad Republicans".  Especially since Hillary Clinton went to bat for GWB's decision to use US armed forces on Iraq.  So the CT'ers lose traction quickly because they're usually liberal democrats first, conspiracy theorist's second.  So if their theory paints someone in the Obama administration in a bad light, nobody wants to hear it.
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #24 on: December 16, 2013, 11:32:14 AM »

At a minimum dozens.  And w even so few at 10 people in on it - someone always screws up - ALWAYS. 

This isn't Hollywood - its real life.   The same idiots who cant even get a website correct, a stim bill to create a single job, etc - are not at the same time capable of carrying this out wo a screw up. 

How do you suppose the CIA could exist, then?
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!