Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
December 22, 2014, 05:20:46 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: New and quite plausible 911 Theory, not previously discussed in this forum  (Read 1664 times)
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« on: December 18, 2013, 09:21:41 AM »

Here is a new and plausible angle on the destruction of WTC on 911, not previously discussed in this forum. It rules OUT controlled demolition, while explaining the presence of thermite. According to the researcher, findings of thermite are to be expected given the circumstances.  She makes a rather compelling case.

It also contains some very interesting anomalies that were glossed over by media. If these anomalies were more widely reported, I believe even more and more people, would have been asking more and more questions.

One thing is very clear, these buildings were not "on fire" as the media parrots claim.
Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, let alone pulverize concrete, and these buildings turned into dust.

The video is in the centre of her web page linked below.

While it is over 2 hours long, it is very much well worth watching.

Grab some popcorn, some egg nog, pull on your favourite onesie, and start watching.

http://www.drjudywood.com/
Report to moderator   Logged

w
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 12:32:46 AM »

Jesse Ventura Explores Directed Energy Weapons Theory

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJPpWNxvZo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJPpWNxvZo</a>

ps: Oliver Stone's son is smokin' HOT!!!   Tongue
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1238


« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2013, 01:21:27 AM »

Here is a new and plausible angle on the destruction of WTC on 911, not previously discussed in this forum. It rules OUT controlled demolition, while explaining the presence of thermite. According to the researcher, findings of thermite are to be expected given the circumstances.  She makes a rather compelling case.

It also contains some very interesting anomalies that were glossed over by media. If these anomalies were more widely reported, I believe even more and more people, would have been asking more and more questions.

One thing is very clear, these buildings were not "on fire" as the media parrots claim.
Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, let alone pulverize concrete, and these buildings turned into dust.

The video is in the centre of her web page linked below.

While it is over 2 hours long, it is very much well worth watching.

Grab some popcorn, some egg nog, pull on your favourite onesie, and start watching.

http://www.drjudywood.com/


Why all this ancient crap all over again? This thermite bullshit is one of the oldest and the most stupidest pile of crap among the 9/11 foil hat pile of futile shit, so you must be insane to bring it up again.

1. you don't have slightest idea how thermite works, it works as a liquid, and follows gravity like liquid, so how do you cut horizontally with hundred of tons of it.

2. it's efficiency is quite poor per kilo, so you need to have tons of it. Still, it's composition is like sand and it is quite light, so liter of the stuff takes at least twice the space. So you need to have lots of room for those hundred of tons of that crap.

3. It ignites by the heat, so how it is possible to install hundred of tons of it in to the space, which will be hit by the full size passenger jet, which starts the fire, which will burn full hour at the temperatures up to 1300C

4. While it burns, it will be superhot, because that is how it works. There will be hundred of tons of liquid thermite in the temperature slightly under 3000C, which would make light brighter than sun. Wire in the ordinary light bulb burns under 1600C, and it is too bright to look at. Double that, and you have light source which will be brighter than anything mankind has seen, and there is hundred of tons of it. How come no one has seen this miracle?

5. Hundred of tons of this superhot lava inside the building would have melted all the windows to liquid, all the aluminum panels from the outer walls, so did it? Well, no.

6. How come there is hardly any melted metal in the ruins, while there should be biggest man made pool of melted steel, so big that they would be able to build new wtc on the top of that steel pedestal. All melted metal found was aluminum, there is no evidence what so ever about the melted steel.

All this is based to facts about the matter, just facts about the chemistry, metallurgy, light physics etc. and shit like that, which you have never heard, and that's why it will be hard to you to understand. They are still facts, it has nothing to do with you and your abilities. For example, when you heat an object which is mostly metal, it will be brighter and brighter until it vaporized. Wolfram string in the light bulb is good example, while it is too bright to watch at the temperature of 1600C. Double that heat up to 3000 C and you triple the brightness. That would have given permanent tan for all in the Manhattan in that day.  
Report to moderator   Logged
avxo
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4111


You've given me multiple traumatic brain injuries!


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2013, 05:06:34 PM »

Here is a new and plausible angle on the destruction of WTC on 911 blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

I don't think that plausible means what you think it means.
Report to moderator   Logged
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2013, 06:50:57 PM »

Why all this ancient crap all over again? This thermite bullshit is one of the oldest and the most stupidest pile of crap among the 9/11 foil hat pile of futile shit, so you must be insane to bring it up again.

1. you don't have slightest idea how thermite works, it works as a liquid, and follows gravity like liquid, so how do you cut horizontally with hundred of tons of it.

2. it's efficiency is quite poor per kilo, so you need to have tons of it. Still, it's composition is like sand and it is quite light, so liter of the stuff takes at least twice the space. So you need to have lots of room for those hundred of tons of that crap.

3. It ignites by the heat, so how it is possible to install hundred of tons of it in to the space, which will be hit by the full size passenger jet, which starts the fire, which will burn full hour at the temperatures up to 1300C

4. While it burns, it will be superhot, because that is how it works. There will be hundred of tons of liquid thermite in the temperature slightly under 3000C, which would make light brighter than sun. Wire in the ordinary light bulb burns under 1600C, and it is too bright to look at. Double that, and you have light source which will be brighter than anything mankind has seen, and there is hundred of tons of it. How come no one has seen this miracle?

5. Hundred of tons of this superhot lava inside the building would have melted all the windows to liquid, all the aluminum panels from the outer walls, so did it? Well, no.

6. How come there is hardly any melted metal in the ruins, while there should be biggest man made pool of melted steel, so big that they would be able to build new wtc on the top of that steel pedestal. All melted metal found was aluminum, there is no evidence what so ever about the melted steel.

All this is based to facts about the matter, just facts about the chemistry, metallurgy, light physics etc. and shit like that, which you have never heard, and that's why it will be hard to you to understand. They are still facts, it has nothing to do with you and your abilities. For example, when you heat an object which is mostly metal, it will be brighter and brighter until it vaporized. Wolfram string in the light bulb is good example, while it is too bright to watch at the temperature of 1600C. Double that heat up to 3000 C and you triple the brightness. That would have given permanent tan for all in the Manhattan in that day.  

Ropo

If you're going to comment on shit, at least have the common sense, if not the common courtesy to at least review the information you're commenting on, ...or stay the fvck out of the thread! This theory does not argue thermite, ...infact, quite the contrary, it dismisses the thermite theory and explains it's presence.

Now either watch Ms Woods talk, or stay the fuck out of the thread!
Report to moderator   Logged

w
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2013, 06:52:28 PM »

I don't think that plausible means what you think it means.

It does.

Merry Christmas you little brat!
Report to moderator   Logged

w
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1238


« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2014, 01:47:25 AM »

Ropo

If you're going to comment on shit, at least have the common sense, if not the common courtesy to at least review the information you're commenting on, ...or stay the fvck out of the thread! This theory does not argue thermite, ...infact, quite the contrary, it dismisses the thermite theory and explains it's presence.

Now either watch Ms Woods talk, or stay the fuck out of the thread!

I have no interest spend hours for some mambo jumbo crap about the thing which I already know. I do not need evidence about the thermite not being there, because it is so obvious it wasn't. Even idiots like you should understand it just by looking original material about the 9/11, so fuck off. What you should know by now, I do not have any courtesy to morons. What you should know about the evidences about the presence of thermite, they are all taken from the site AFTER the rescue, where rescue workers were using thermal lances which has same ingredients than thermite. Harrit, father of the thermite theory has told this himself. Evidence which was base of his theory, wasn't straight at the site, but objects from the site which people has kept in their homes, and given to him to study years later. Therefore, there is no way to prove that those objects isn't covered by debris of thermal lances.  
Report to moderator   Logged
24KT
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 24462


Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2014, 06:18:52 PM »

I have no interest spend hours for some mambo jumbo crap about the thing which I already know. I do not need evidence about the thermite not being there, because it is so obvious it wasn't. Even idiots like you should understand it just by looking original material about the 9/11, so fuck off. What you should know by now, I do not have any courtesy to morons. What you should know about the evidences about the presence of thermite, they are all taken from the site AFTER the rescue, where rescue workers were using thermal lances which has same ingredients than thermite. Harrit, father of the thermite theory has told this himself. Evidence which was base of his theory, wasn't straight at the site, but objects from the site which people has kept in their homes, and given to him to study years later. Therefore, there is no way to prove that those objects isn't covered by debris of thermal lances.  

And anyone who took the time to view the clip now knows what a complete jackass you are with that kind of a response. Sometimes, people can only suspect you're an idiot, ...but then you open your mouth and they know for certain you are. Bellicose Blowhard!  Angry
Report to moderator   Logged

w
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20691


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2014, 11:09:33 AM »

Why would anyone take the time to view a clip full of  assumptions, conjecture, incorrect facts, drama etc.?

If its a legit theory it should then be able to be laid out in text with supporting verified facts.
Report to moderator   Logged
Ropo
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1238


« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2014, 11:52:03 AM »

And anyone who took the time to view the clip now knows what a complete jackass you are with that kind of a response. Sometimes, people can only suspect you're an idiot, ...but then you open your mouth and they know for certain you are. Bellicose Blowhard!  Angry
Why I should waste time to something, which I know for a fact to be complete bullshit? Is that too hard to understand with brains, overcooked in the heat of the foil hat?
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!