Author Topic: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?  (Read 8391 times)

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #50 on: December 25, 2013, 01:35:46 PM »

You're pretty strong. Built a good foundation before juicing. That will be rewarded later in your lifting carreer and life in general.

Do hack squats for sets of 20 (if your knees allow it).
should i do both leg press AND hack squat or alternate workouts?

which do i do first, how many sets

thanks

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #51 on: December 25, 2013, 01:37:06 PM »
black women love big asses on guys...just sayin.
they love big arms, big cocks, full heads of hair, shiny premium cars, big bank accounts


like any other woman


big ass, uhm no that's black MEN

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #52 on: December 25, 2013, 01:38:05 PM »
This talk of pros squatting light is so liberating.... Maybe I'm not a pussy

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #53 on: December 25, 2013, 01:45:33 PM »
they love big arms, big cocks, full heads of hair, shiny premium cars, big bank accounts


like any other woman


big ass, uhm no that's black MEN

how about naming those 'hunting' grounds  ;D ' or should I guess Monte Carlo,Chelsea,Shangai Starbuck,Santa Monicas promenade,............

kohl

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #54 on: December 25, 2013, 01:49:48 PM »
should i do both leg press AND hack squat or alternate workouts?

which do i do first, how many sets

thanks


Leg press first and hack squat after that is a perfect match.

If your knees can stand it, you can do hacks alone. If so, warm up thoroughly.

Training total around 100 reps for quads.

Don't be afraid to do drop sets once and a while.

No set of 5 rep squats can give your quads a beating like a high rep drop set on LP or Hack.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #55 on: December 25, 2013, 01:57:00 PM »

Leg press first and hack squat after that is a perfect match.

If your knees can stand it, you can do hacks alone. If so, warm up thoroughly.

Training total around 100 reps for quads.

Don't be afraid to do drop sets once and a while.

No set of 5 rep squats can give your quads a beating like a high rep drop set on LP or Hack.
and what about hamstrings


do them first? if they are behind quad development?


and what exercise

thanks

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #56 on: December 25, 2013, 01:58:50 PM »
This talk of pros squatting light is so liberating.... Maybe I'm not a pussy
dont worry, ust bc its not very heavy, doesnt mean it isnt very intense,its in fact relatively very heavy.

that said, if one has the drugs and can do 4plates each side in the fashion that mawse described, they wil have olympia stage or npc heavyweight ready legs size.

us mere mortals can be happy if we get something like i have :D

n

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #57 on: December 25, 2013, 02:02:11 PM »
most importantly

thigh dominant physique looks bad


they need to be decent and seperated


but not distract from the upper body

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #58 on: December 25, 2013, 02:07:26 PM »
most importantly

thigh dominant physique looks bad


they need to be decent and seperated


but not distract from the upper body
yeah when the hamstrings pop out backward from side perspective is ok and good.

but when the tight dwarfe thwe quads from teh front perspective this suck,i try to avoid developing that look at all cost
n

kohl

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #59 on: December 25, 2013, 02:24:21 PM »
and what about hamstrings


do them first? if they are behind quad development?


and what exercise

thanks


If they lag behind do them first.

If they are ahead, do them last.

If you have knee issues, do first leg curls, then leg press, then the rest of your quad training and then do the RDL part of your ham workout.

Hams = RDL and all kinds of curls (lying, standing, seated). Keep it simple. Never understood that silly exercise hype (glute ham raises and all that stuff that in 25 years I have never seen done by an advanced bodybuilder).

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #60 on: December 25, 2013, 02:25:54 PM »
ôk so something like

4-5 set leg curl

4 set leg press

4 set hack squat

4 set stiff leg

kohl

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #61 on: December 25, 2013, 02:39:31 PM »
ôk so something like

4-5 set leg curl

4 set leg press

4 set hack squat

4 set stiff leg


Basically yes, looks good to me.

Don't be afraid to do dropsets on the leg curls also, works really well.

RDL don't go too heavy, it's typically an exercise where you can develop an excellent muscle-mind connection. Dennis Wolf doesn't need more then two plates each side on this, and Kai only one! Look at those guys hams!! Stay with 12 reps for hams.


ProudVirgin69

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7496
  • hardcore redneck electric champion
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #62 on: December 25, 2013, 02:47:08 PM »
ôk so something like

4-5 set leg curl

4 set leg press

4 set hack squat

4 set stiff leg

Do your stifflegged deadlifts with dumbbells...otherwise, looks pretty good.

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #63 on: December 25, 2013, 03:40:37 PM »
" careful huge trap"


Wait, this is a WHYI thread now?

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10175
  • i win.
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #64 on: December 26, 2013, 12:35:09 AM »
Dear dumb ass fuck, are you really mentally handicapped or something? When you do something like squats, what is your weakest link in that range of motion? Quads, which are able to press thousand pounds in leg press, or hips and back? You have more strength in your legs than you have your back and gluteus, because you don't train them properly. There is old thumb rule about the matter, which says that you must be able to do same reps of good morning with half of your squat weights, than you do squats with full weight. Like 20 reps with 140kg squat = 20 reps of 70kg good mornings. That way you can maintain balance between these muscles, and hips and back isn't the weakest link in your squat. Therefor the point is that if you do it right, squats are best exercise for quads, and if you do it like a moron, it is waste of time.

that's not accurate.

if that were true, champion, world record squatters would use a high-bar,narrow stance for squats to "turn off" the hips/glutes/hams..

but, they don't... they use a wide stance and initate the movement (with a low bar) to DE-EMPHASIZE the quads and focus on the hips and glutes.

hips/glutes/hamps are FAR SUPRIOR strength-wise than quads.

quads are the weak link.

deceiver

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2666
  • onetimehard appreciation team
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #65 on: December 26, 2013, 02:42:35 AM »
that's not accurate.

if that were true, champion, world record squatters would use a high-bar,narrow stance for squats to "turn off" the hips/glutes/hams..

but, they don't... they use a wide stance and initate the movement (with a low bar) to DE-EMPHASIZE the quads and focus on the hips and glutes.

hips/glutes/hamps are FAR SUPRIOR strength-wise than quads.

quads are the weak link.

Well, you're wrong and right. Wide stance works for some, mostly for equipped lifters.



This is world record squat in IPF. 400kg, stance is wide but not ultra wide. This is best raw squat in the history (of IPF)

The reason why olympic lifters do not have best squat in the world is that they don't (can't) use as much PEDs as everyone else. They just use dianabol and test because they are tested extensively.

In gold soviet era when everyone abused PEDs:

http://www.dynamic-eleiko.com/sportivny/library/news/nv005.html

Quote
B.C. What strength exercises do you favor?
Taranenko: The back squat is the most important strength exercise. I usually squat every day, sometimes more than once-a-day. My best back squat is 380 kg (837 lbs). But this is with a two-second pause at the bottom.

http://www.dynamic-eleiko.com/sportivny/library/farticles004.html

Quote
The author witnessed the Soviet superheavyweight Aslanbek Yenaldiev pinned with a 240 kg clean at the 1979 Spartakiade. He tried bouncing 6 - 8 times but was physically unable to recover form the squat. He was the "champion squatter" among the soviet lifters with a 455 kg back squat (23).

Many soviets could squat well over 400kg with narrow-medium stance and high bar.



300kg atg squat @ 82.5kg... No powerlifters can beat that.

The reasons why powerlifters use low bar are:

 - low bar uses just a little bit less quads and more hams and lower back. hams are fast-twitch dominant, quads are 50-50, glutes are slow twitch dominant.
 - best powerlifters are naturally strong in deadlift, low bar has greater carry-over from deads than high bar

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26378
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #66 on: December 26, 2013, 02:49:20 AM »
most importantly

thigh dominant physique looks bad


they need to be decent and seperated


but not distract from the upper body

agreed

and bigass wheels with narrowass shoulders is the absolute worst combo

and btw, deceiver knows what he's talking about


Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #67 on: December 26, 2013, 06:13:05 AM »
that's not accurate.

if that were true, champion, world record squatters would use a high-bar,narrow stance for squats to "turn off" the hips/glutes/hams..

but, they don't... they use a wide stance and initate the movement (with a low bar) to DE-EMPHASIZE the quads and focus on the hips and glutes.

hips/glutes/hamps are FAR SUPRIOR strength-wise than quads.

quads are the weak link.

So, you are some how unable to understand, that champions and world record squatters doesn't have same problems as getbig asshats and fucking imbeciles has? Champions has include correct muscle balance in their training routines as the first thing after their childhood, and dumbfucks like anabholico doesn't even know the meaning of the word. Have you ever seen the guy starting the rise from squat, and his torso doesn't seem to be rising in same synch with his ass? Like this asshole here:

Not enough strength in midsection to do it right, so his lower back is weakest link.

nasht5

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2119
  • 903 squat 457bench 735 dead - "RAW" (belt & wraps)
Re: galeniko etc theory on squats, can someone explain biomechanics behind it?
« Reply #68 on: December 26, 2013, 06:20:16 AM »
for i feel it is true what they say but wonder why


when you squat with 100kg you can somehow make it feel like pure quadriceps


when you squat with 140kg or something to the same depth it actually feels like still quads but also hips and back


therefor what is the point of heavy squats for quads


and why is this

you wouldn't understand.
sept 10th APF