Meh. Brit Hume is usually on Megan Kelly's show by himself. She also has liberal commentators who appear by themselves. That's not evidence of being unfair or unbalanced. He appears on the Fox News Sunday as part of a panel that always includes someone left of center.
Are you now not only arguing that Cruz is not being treated unfairly by many on fox, but also that FOX is truly Fair and Balanced? come on Beach, even you posted earlier that they bash Trump, Megan Kelly will have on 2 guest at the same time and they both are bashing Trump while at the same time she is sitting there agreeing and adding her hits as well, with no one there to talk for trump, and Bret Bair is even worse having 3 on his panel and all will be bashing Trump with no one on there to take trumps side. IS that your definition of "Fair and Balanced? So If You want to debate about FOX's treatment of Cruz then OK we can have that debate, but if you truly want to say that FOX is Fair and Balanced, then you are beyond reasoning.
He appears on the Fox News Sunday as part of a panel that always includes someone left of center.
Is that person who is "left of center" that you speak of on Fox News Sunday there defending Trump and Cruz from Brit Hume (and others) bashing them? the answer is no, so what does that have to do with this argument? and that in no way shows them as Fair and Balanced, as Fair and Balanced is letting both sides have an equal say (which they do not when it comes to Trump and Cruz) and this argument is about Brit along with others at Fox being for the Washington Establishment candidates and unfairly bashing Cruz, its not about democrat vs republican.
Rubio ran for Senator as being 100% against Amnesty and he called out his opponents for not being against Amnesty, yet once elected he did a 100% flip and teamed up with many democrats and republican establishments to ram amnesty through, yet Fox never shows that in any negative way, they do not point this out, not like they point out Cruz's previous words, why is that? If you are going to do it to Cruz then shouldn't you do it to Rubio too and have him explain his sudden flip? (I mean that is a complete flip from one of the main people pushing Amnesty) is that not the "Fair and Balanced" way? but if they did do it, and did it as often as they have done it to Cruz then by all means show me, as the only thing I can recall is Brit Hume defending Rubio when it comes to this subject.
In fact for someone who is so fast to put down my proof and evidence (videos and links ) that supports my point, you sure dont put up any to justify your side of the argument. where is your proof?
All you do is downplay my links and videos, basically saying myself, Levin, and Rush have made something out of nothing. yet where is your proof?
Please show proof where Brit Hume writes negatively of Rubio during the Debates on twitter like he did of Cruz?
Please post where Brit discusses how when Rubio ran for Senator he was strongly against Amnesty (and shows a video to support that) and then once elected he did an exact and sudden flip and is now for Amnesty so strongly that he even teams up with democrats, showing the contradiction of words like Brit has done non stop to Cruz.
Please post video links to all the many times that after the debate where Rubio admitted he is for Amnesty where then anyone on FOX News played that video of Rubio saying he is strongly against Amnesty while running for Senator showing the contradictions in his words and beliefs like they have done to Cruz non stop by playing the video of Cruz.
Post a link to where Roger Ailes (who runs FOX) speaks negatively of Rubio, as he did of Cruz.
Post a link to where Greg Gutfield refers to Rubio as "only being for himself" or "only about him" as he did referring to Cruz when Cruz gave a speech announcing that he was running for President.
Post a link to where Charles Krauthammer refers to Rubio as being a hypocrite like he did Cruz ?
Post a link to where Brit Hume refers to Rubio as being a hypocrite like he did Cruz ?