Author Topic: Still the ideal after 65 years?...  (Read 21138 times)

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #50 on: January 17, 2014, 04:10:31 PM »
Extremely overrated ,



The dude had a nice physique. ...but most perfect proportions and build ever ?


I can't stop laughing.

BikiniSlut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4988
  • I'm dating and love Uncle Junior! Xoxoxo
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #51 on: January 17, 2014, 04:11:24 PM »
There are people on this board with better bodies than that.

Arms are pathetic.  Long torso, cankles. Big kness..blurry watery thighs.

And  hs abs SUCK

No...it's all a matter of opinion.

It really is.

Bigger and drier/leaner doesn't mean better necessarily.

Look at the variety of shapes and sizes that you guys like when posting pics of women. Same with men. It's everybodys individual preference.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #52 on: January 17, 2014, 04:11:38 PM »
There are people on this board with better bodies than that.

Arms are pathetic.  Long torso, cankles. Big kness..blurry watery thighs.

And  hs abs SUCK

I agree , but are they natural? do they train like him? they have the benefit of years of experiments and trail & error , improvements.

His abs suck?  ???

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #53 on: January 17, 2014, 04:12:49 PM »
Extremely overrated ,




I think he looks really good there...
O

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #54 on: January 17, 2014, 04:13:49 PM »
The dude had a nice physique. ...but most perfect proportions and build ever ?


I can't stop laughing.

Not even close , I can post 100's  pics of guys looking  better than him.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #55 on: January 17, 2014, 04:14:44 PM »
I agree , but are they natural? do they train like him? they have the benefit of years of experiments and trail & error , improvements.

His abs suck?  ???

They are good in that pic

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #56 on: January 17, 2014, 04:15:21 PM »

I think he looks really good there...

He looks good but nothing special.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #57 on: January 17, 2014, 04:15:26 PM »
Not even close , I can post 100's  pics of guys looking  better than him.

Looking better how? in better condition? sure all about context. this is 1947

Can you find another natty who was 6'1" who weighed 215lbs with a 29" waist and had arms , neck and calves all the same size?

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17431
  • Getbig!
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #58 on: January 17, 2014, 04:16:15 PM »
Best bodybuilder of all time. He was finished competing by the time the first anabolic steroid was invented in the late 50's. I really don't care what Oliva has to say about Steve Reeves using. He was a little boy in Cuba when Reeves was competing. Don't show me pictures of steroid users and their temporary drug physique as example of how he doesn't compare. He also maintained his built for decades unlike today's stars who look like fat soft crap in the same year they competed.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #59 on: January 17, 2014, 04:18:10 PM »
Easy to say in 2014 that he's not that impressive but when all things are considered he's  exceptional

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66359
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #60 on: January 17, 2014, 04:19:57 PM »
He looks good but nothing special.


I forgot all about Reg Park....Reg takes Steve in this pic bigtime.

EDIT:
Looking closer,it`s pretty close,but Park has better abs here.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #61 on: January 17, 2014, 04:20:21 PM »
Looking better how? in better condition? sure all about context. this is 1947

Can you find another natty who was 6'1" who weighed 215lbs with a 29" waist and had arms , neck and calves all the same size?

the "Greek Ideal"

A bit dated. The Greeks thought the Earth was flat too

And again..those measurements are according to who...Steve Reeves ?

Point is BBers have been bullshitting in muscle magazines since day one.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #62 on: January 17, 2014, 04:20:36 PM »
Looking better how? in better condition? sure all about context. this is 1947

Can you find another natty who was 6'1" who weighed 215lbs with a 29" waist and had arms , neck and calves all the same size?

I don't give a fuck how tall he was ,I'm judging his symmetry ,proportions ,flow ......  not his height ,weight ,etc .
Arms .neck and calves same size doesn't mean shit , I hope this helps.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17431
  • Getbig!
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #63 on: January 17, 2014, 04:21:14 PM »
During World war II when he was in the military they called him the Shape. What do you think the top Pros would look like if they were in the military during World War II? How would the steroid users of this board look?  

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #64 on: January 17, 2014, 04:21:27 PM »
I forgot all about Reg Park....Reg takes Steve in this pic bigtime.

Destroys him actually

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #65 on: January 17, 2014, 04:22:43 PM »
During World war II when he was in the military they called him the Shape. What do you think the top Pros would look like if they were in the military during World War II? How would the steroid users of this board look?  

Who gives a fuck..seriously with the fanboy comments. 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #66 on: January 17, 2014, 04:25:02 PM »
I don't give a fuck how tall he was ,I'm judging his symmetry ,proportions ,flow ......  not his height ,weight ,etc .
Arms .neck and calves same size doesn't mean shit , I hope this helps.

Okay where are all these guys NATURAL who beat him according to you?  ::)

I'll be waiting.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #67 on: January 17, 2014, 04:27:06 PM »
Okay where are all these guys NATURAL who beat him according to you?  ::)

I'll be waiting.
Here is one



BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16750
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #68 on: January 17, 2014, 04:29:19 PM »
Methyl Testosterone tablets were available over the counter right after WWII -

http://books.google.com/books?id=fiYDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA258&dq=hudson+methyltestosterone&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xcnZUsi4CuzMsQTyiIGIDg&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hudson%20methyltestosterone&f=false .

You can see that they weren't a secret product either, Popular Science was a big magazine back then.

el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #69 on: January 17, 2014, 04:30:47 PM »
Extremely overrated ,



Aside from a couple of weirdos with homosexual tendencies nobody really gives a fv** about him so I wouldn't call him overrated.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66359
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #70 on: January 17, 2014, 04:30:54 PM »
Destroys him actually
Park has a thicker more dense look to his physique.

(no homo)

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17431
  • Getbig!
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #71 on: January 17, 2014, 04:31:02 PM »
Who gives a fuck..seriously with the fanboy comments. 

Seriously, who gives a fuck about your temporary muscles? You take steroids to feel like a man but deep down inside you know you would look like crap off drugs. Eventually the truth will hit you hard when you have to go off because of finance, arrest or health. Enjoy the ignorant fools who praise you but I think they whisper steroids behind your back so they don't hurt your feelings.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80094
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #72 on: January 17, 2014, 04:33:54 PM »
Methyl Testosterone tablets were available over the counter right after WWII -

http://books.google.com/books?id=fiYDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA258&dq=hudson+methyltestosterone&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xcnZUsi4CuzMsQTyiIGIDg&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hudson%20methyltestosterone&f=false .

You can see that they weren't a secret product either, Popular Science was a big magazine back then.

Wow that certainly proves he was on  ::)

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #73 on: January 17, 2014, 04:35:52 PM »
Exactly it's all context

Show me another all NATURAL guy who was 6'1" 215lbs with perfect proportions and a 29" waist , there has never been another guy who came close

Guy ate 3 times a day , worked out his entire body at once , no supplements to speak of , next to no real equipment , he developed exercises. Who has done more with less?

The guys structure & proportions are unrivaled.

While not being ALL natural, this man came pretty damn close

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #74 on: January 17, 2014, 04:36:09 PM »
Wow that certainly proves he was on  ::)

No one knows if he was on or not , do you agree ND?