Author Topic: Still the ideal after 65 years?...  (Read 20939 times)

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #100 on: January 17, 2014, 05:04:13 PM »
What accomplishments?  ??? he won 2 contests

Labrada smokes him in terms of accomplishments , success , physique Lee gets the respect because he earned it , Shawn acted like he was one of the best he never proved it.

Won 2, but was constantly overlooked. He should have won far more than he did and if it wasn't for Dorian and the judges on the size game, he WOULD HAVE. He was the most consistent bodybuilder of all time imo.

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16475
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #101 on: January 17, 2014, 05:05:13 PM »
The FDA is saying he was on?  ??? come on you have to do better than that.

I read about the parachute from da Vinci in 1485 , doesn't mean people were base jumping.

No, you where guessing that that ad I linked to was a fake product. That link I posted in response proves that it was real Methyl Testosterone being offered for sale because it is a link to a synopsis for the judgement the FDA got against Hudson Products for selling hormones without proper labeling and warnings.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #102 on: January 17, 2014, 05:05:25 PM »
Yup, he just doesn't get the respect he truly deserves. Dude had an incredible and damn near flawless physique, combining mass with symmetry.



 ;D

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31503
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #103 on: January 17, 2014, 05:05:34 PM »
What accomplishments?  ??? he won 2 contests

Labrada smokes him in terms of accomplishments , success , physique Lee gets the respect because he earned it , Shawn acted like he was one of the best he never proved it.
technically 3 he got drug tested and failed lol..labrada had great career,great build too,,yes...labrada was a judges/promoters /type,,i'm sure he knew who to talk too...smart guy,,

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #104 on: January 17, 2014, 05:06:51 PM »
No, you where guessing that that ad I linked to was a fake product. That link I posted in response proves that it was real Methyl Testosterone being offered for sale because it is a link to a synopsis for the judgement the FDA got against Hudson Products for selling hormones without proper labeling and warnings.

I never said fake. I said it made a claim doesn't mean it would. Doesn't mean he used it. proves absolutely nothing.


el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #105 on: January 17, 2014, 05:08:43 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #106 on: January 17, 2014, 05:09:07 PM »
Won 2, but was constantly overlooked. He should have won far more than he did and if it wasn't for Dorian and the judges on the size game, he WOULD HAVE. He was the most consistent bodybuilder of all time imo.

He wasn't overlooked , he just wasn't good enough. And it wasn't only against Dorian. Labrada was more consistent , never placed below 5th in any pro contest always in shape.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #107 on: January 17, 2014, 05:10:04 PM »
You're an obssesed poster.

And you just fucking figured this out? Or does it make you feel better repeating others?  ::)

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16475
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #108 on: January 17, 2014, 05:10:49 PM »
I never said fake. I said it made a claim doesn't mean it would. Doesn't mean he used it. proves absolutely nothing.



Proves that there were viable steroids available to people before Dianabol.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #109 on: January 17, 2014, 05:12:06 PM »
technically 3 he got drug tested and failed lol..labrada had great career,great build too,,yes...labrada was a judges/promoters /type,,i'm sure he knew who to talk too...smart guy,,

Lee better physique , better competitive record , better human , and he's not sucking Blechman's dick for pennies.

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #110 on: January 17, 2014, 05:13:02 PM »
;D

Oh come on dude. Talk about cherry picking and choosing the worst possible shot of Shawn. That's just not right. I'm not Hulkster. I'm not blind with admiration and denial. I admit that Dorian was a freak and everyone else in that era tried to compete with his size. I respect Shawn, because he stayed true to his integrity and as a result (along with being quite vocal) was punished for it and guess what? He KNEW IT.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #111 on: January 17, 2014, 05:14:46 PM »
Proves that there were viable steroids available to people before Dianabol.

No it doesn't it proves there was an ad. viable steroids lol if you're gullible enough to believe that I wonder why Dr John Zeigler didn't just use them at York?  ::)

read this please

Friday, August 21, 2009
The History of Steroids in Bodybuilding
Periodically on the various internet bodybuilding forums someone makes a completely baseless statement about steroid use, when it started, and who was using them back in the 'old days'. When I see ignorance being masqueraded as fact I almost always feel compelled to join the discussion and refute some of the often outrageous statements being hurled about. I'm going to recap what's known about the history of anabolic steroid use in sports so I can refer people to this entry rather than go through it time and time again.

All reliable sources - publications by Terry Todd, John Fair, Randy Roach, Bill Starr, etc, as well as interviews and letters from John Ziegler, John Grimek, Bill March, etc - indicate that experimentation with testosterone for athletic purposes began in the U.S. sometime in either late 1954 or 1955. These 'trials' were short-lived, however, as the results were disappointing and testosterone use was deemed ineffective and carried the risk of harmful side-effects. A statistical analysis of Olympic-style Weightlifting performances published in the International Journal of the History of Sport concluded that Soviet athletes likely first used testosterone sometime between 1952 and 1956.

Dr. John Ziegler, physician for the U.S. Olympic Weightlifting team (i.e. the York team), described in interviews of learning about the Soviet use of testosterone injections at the 1954 World Weightlifting Championships in Vienna, Austria in October of that year. Some time after returning home, Ziegler convinced York affiliated lifters John Grimek, Jim Park and Yaz Kuzahara to be test subjects and receive testosterone injections. By Grimek's account, the results were disappointing. In a private letter, dated at the time, Grimek spoke of seeing nothing in the way of gains and quiting the injections because he felt he was actually regressing. Jim Park received only one injection which he claimed did nothing for him physically, but made him incredibly horny. It is unclear as to Kuzahara's experience but, in any case, it was not positive enough to warrant continued use and further experimentation was ceased. In light of the terrible side effects that Ziegler had heard of and witnessed Soviet users suffering, and lack of significant results in his own test subjects, no further experimentation with testosterone was tried by the York (U.S.) Weightlifting team for the duration of the 1950s.

This was not the end of Ziegler's involvement with steroids, however. Ziegler began work with CIBA Pharmaceuticals in 1955 to develop a testosterone derivative that would carry the anabolic properties of testosterone without the undesirable side effects. Preliminary results began coming in by 1956, and Dianabol was released to the U.S. prescription drug market in 1958 for use in wasting conditions. CIBA's competitor, Searle, beat them to the market, however, and introduced Nilevar, the first synthetic anabolic/androgenic steroid, to the prescription drug market in 1956 (used as a polio treatment).

In late 1959 (some claim as early as 1958, some as late as 1960) Ziegler decided to try the new Dianabol on some of the non-medal contending York lifters and enlisted Grimek to convince a few lifters to begin taking it under his (Ziegler's) supervision. Lower level or non-competitive lifters were chosen for the initial trials so as not to risk marring the performance of medal contenders at the upcoming 1960 Olympics (Dianabol was, at that time, a relatively untested drug and York chief Bob Hoffman was said to have feared trying it on his top lifters). Bill March, Tony Garcy, John Grimek, Ziegler himself and later Lou Riecke were the first Guinea Pigs, and the results were much more promising this time around.

From there, Dianabol use quickly spread to the entire York Weightlifting team. Now, up-and-coming York lifters and Strength and Health magazine writers such as Bill Starr and Tommy Suggs started letting the secret out to the bodybuilding community, and by the early-to-mid 1960s almost all high-level competitive bodybuilders were taking steroids in the weeks leading up to contests. This pre-contest cycling scheme by bodybuilders was based on the Weightlifters' practice of escalating steroid use in the weeks leading up to lifting meets - the logic being that just as the lifters wanted to be at their best (strongest) come meet day, bodybuilders wanted to peak at their biggest on the day of the contest. It didn't take long for steroid use to spill into the 'off-season' as well, as this allowed bodybuilders to build more ultimate muscle mass.

The man who would go on to become the first Mr. Olympia, Larry Scott, gained 8 pounds of muscle in two months between the 1960 Mr. Los Angeles (in which he placed third), and the 1960 Mr. California (which he won, defeating the two men who had placed above him in the Mr. Los Angeles two months earlier). A year earlier he had won the Mr. Idaho weighing just 152 pounds. Larry credits Rheo Blair, and his protein powder, as being instrumental in his sudden improvement. However, considering Larry's dramatic gains from that point onward, and Blair's reported possession of Nilevar a few years earlier before he even moved to California, it is quite likely that this time in 1960 also marks Larry's first usage of steroids (something to which he admits but, to my knowledge, hasn't specified the date).

But the early 1960s did't mark the true origins of bodybuilder's regular use of steroids, however. In an early edition of his book Getting Stronger, Bill Pearl told of meeting Arthur Jones (founder of the Nautilus line of training equipment and father of the "HIT" style of training) in 1958 and learning of Nilevar from him. After a little further investigation, Pearl began a twelve-week cycle of the steroid and gained 25 pounds. At around that same time, Irvin Johnson (aka Rheo H. Blair - 'father' of the first protein powders) is said to have had Searle's Nilevar in his possession, though he isn't believed to have been widely distributing it to bodybuilders at that time.

So what can we gather from all of this? First of all, no bodybuilder or lifter was using synthetic steroids before 1956 - they didn't exist. Most likely, only the very highest level West Coast bodybuilders knew of them by 1958. From there it seems that knowledge of Nilevar and Dianabol to build muscle and strength was kept relatively in the closet until the early 1960s. After all, Hoffman did not want outside athletes to know his lifters' secrets and he was using their sudden gains via Dianabol to promote his supplement line and isometric training courses and racks. Bill Starr wrote that until he was a national calibre lifter with York in the early 1960s he had never heard of steroids. Reg Park (Mr. Universe 1951, 1958, 1965) said that the first he heard of them were in connection with rumours about East German and Soviet athletes during the 1960 Olympics, though he later heard of "steroids" being used on British POWs from Singapore in WWII as they were being nursed back to health in Australian hospitals. Chet Yorton (Mr. America 1966, Mr. Universe 1966, 1975) has said that he first heard of steroids (Nilevar) in 1964, and decided not to risk using them - Yorton went on to become one of the sports most outspoken campaigners against steroid use and founder of the first drug-tested, natural bodybuilding federation. The condition of national and world level bodybuilders appears to have taken a visible leap between 1960 to 1964.

As for testosterone itself, Paul de Kruif's 1945 book "The Male Hormone" is often cited as "proof" that bodybuilders knew of and were using testosterone in the 1940s. But even though testosterone had been identified by researchers and isolated in laboratory settings as early as the 1930s, it didn't receive FDA approval as a prescription drug until 1950 and, therefore, was produced only sporadically and in small batches for research purposes only, before that time. De Kruif himself made no connection between testosterone and possible athletic applications - his arguments were purely from the perspective of using testosterone to improve the vitality and health of aging men and those with specific conditions.

It has been said that John Grimek, upon reading publications such as de Kruif's, was inquiring about testosterone in the 1940s. But he would have had nothing other than a possible hunch that it could be used for athletic purposes, and no source or opportunity to experiment with it. It wasn't until 1954/1955 with Ziegler, that Grimek wrote of getting his first testosterone injections. It stands to reason that if even Grimek had no access to testosterone, and no knowledge of other top level bodybuilders or lifters using it before this - and as editor of Strength and Health magazine and second in command at York he certainly was in a position to know - then it is very unlikely that anyone in the west was using it for athletic/physique purposes before late 1954/1955. Given that these early experiments were unsuccessful and brief (likely because they knew little about dosing for increased strength and muscle mass), it is most likely that the first western bodybuilders began steroid use not with testosterone itself, but with Nilevar, sometime after 1956 to 1958. From there, Dianabol enters the picture at the elite level and by 1964 even the muscle magazines, such as Iron Man, were writing about what they called the "tissue building drugs".

For a western bodybuilder or lifter to be using testosterone before late 1954/1955 he would had to have known more about the biochemistry of testosterone and it's potential effects than any western sports physician - and have had access to what was then a relatively little known prescription drug. He would also had to have known more about how to effectively dose it than John Ziegler, who would go on to co-develop Dianabol just a few years later. As for before late 1954/1955, nobody in the west can say for sure exactly when the Soviets began using testosterone, but the likely date is sometime before October 1954 and possibly as early as 1952.

As mentioned, testosterone was first approved for prescription as a cancer, wasting and burn treatment in the U.S. in 1950. Before that it was classified as an experimental drug and not available even to physicians. For a bodybuilder to be using testosterone before 1950 he would not only had to have known more about the biochemistry, dosing and potential usage of it than anybody else in the world (including the research scientists working with it), but also have had access to what was then an experimental drug, isolated sporadically in limited amounts for controlled research purposes, and not produced in quantity.

For these reasons it can be stated with some certainty that Steve Reeves, Clancy Ross, John Grimek, Jack Delinger, Reg Park, John Farbotnik, George Eiferman, etc - who all won major physique titles before the Soviets began using testosterone and before synthetic steroids were introduced in 1956 - were not using testosterone or steroids at the time of their Mr. America, Mr. USA and Mr. Universe wins. Furthermore, it is unlikely that any major title winner was a steroid user before 1957-58 (Pearl won the Mr. USA and Mr. Universe titles in 1956 before his knowledge of Nilevar). Some athletes' careers from the era, such as Reg Park's, do span the introduction of steroids into bodybuilding. In Park's case, he competed at 214 pounds when he won the Mr. Universe title in 1951, he weighed 215 when he won it the second time in 1958, and 216 when he placed 3rd in 1971 (at age 43 - he returned again in 1973 to place 2nd). If Park did jump on the steroid bandwagon when he learned of them in 1960, then they produced one pound of muscle in 11 years for him.

el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #112 on: January 17, 2014, 05:15:32 PM »
And you just fucking figured this out? Or does it make you feel better repeating others?  ::)

It's pretty clear for everyone but you.

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #113 on: January 17, 2014, 05:17:50 PM »
He wasn't overlooked , he just wasn't good enough. And it wasn't only against Dorian. Labrada was more consistent , never placed below 5th in any pro contest always in shape.

Right, but Labarada competed in a different era. He competed with Robby Robinson, Albert Beckles, Mike Christian, Berry Demey, Bob Paris, Rich Gaspari and yes, Haney, but there was no race to the size game in that era. Labrada bowed out when the size game became a factor. I respect Shawn for having the balls to compete against 250+ pound guys. He knew he couldn't measure up to their size, but he didn't bow out like Labrada, or even like Haney did. He stuck it out and was vocal about the unfairness of the new judging criteria, YET, he was still there battling it out, year in and year out. If he had competed in the 80's, it would have been a whole different story and you know it.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #114 on: January 17, 2014, 05:19:15 PM »
Oh come on dude. Talk about cherry picking and choosing the worst possible shot of Shawn. That's just not right. I'm not Hulkster. I'm not blind with admiration and denial. I admit that Dorian was a freak and everyone else in that era tried to compete with his size. I respect Shawn, because he stayed true to his integrity and as a result (along with being quite vocal) was punished for it and guess what? He KNEW IT.

I could find worse lol  ;D

He was NOT punished for it that was his excuse for his failures. A man doesn't make excuses. Shawn wanted the sport to bend to him and when it didn't he railed against anyone and everyone who didn't see it his way. His theory about how the judges only rewarded size was bullshit because he beat Nasser El Sonbaty multiple times if that were the case he would have never.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #115 on: January 17, 2014, 05:21:56 PM »
Right, but Labarada competed in a different era. He competed with Robby Robinson, Albert Beckles, Mike Christian, Berry Demey, Bob Paris, Rich Gaspari and yes, Haney, but there was no race to the size game in that era. Labrada bowed out when the size game became a factor. I respect Shawn for having the balls to compete against 250+ pound guys. He knew he couldn't measure up to their size, but he didn't bow out like Labrada, or even like Haney did. He stuck it out and was vocal about the unfairness of the new judging criteria, YET, he was still there battling it out, year in and year out. If he had competed in the 80's, it would have been a whole different story and you know it.

Ummmm no he didn't Lee and Shawn competed in the same era with Haney , Shawn's first Olympia was 1988  ??? Lee retired in 95

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12947
  • What you!
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #116 on: January 17, 2014, 05:25:25 PM »
I met Tony Lanza in the summer of 1965 in Montreal. He was the photographer who took  many of the best photos of Steve Reeves. He showed me some of his original negatives and some were quite large. I think his collection plus the negatives were bought by a collector in the USA, maybe Milton Moore.

Tony imposed the Reeves photo on one showing the scene behind him in this by the Gods photo. I would love to have a go at editing it now. Did what I could but the original was small, noisy and lacked detail.

Skylge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2835
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #117 on: January 17, 2014, 05:27:12 PM »

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #118 on: January 17, 2014, 05:27:53 PM »
No it doesn't it proves there was an ad. viable steroids lol if you're gullible enough to believe that I wonder why Dr John Zeigler didn't just use them at York?  ::)

read this please

Friday, August 21, 2009
The History of Steroids in Bodybuilding
Periodically on the various internet bodybuilding forums someone makes a completely baseless statement about steroid use, when it started, and who was using them back in the 'old days'. When I see ignorance being masqueraded as fact I almost always feel compelled to join the discussion and refute some of the often outrageous statements being hurled about. I'm going to recap what's known about the history of anabolic steroid use in sports so I can refer people to this entry rather than go through it time and time again.

All reliable sources - publications by Terry Todd, John Fair, Randy Roach, Bill Starr, etc, as well as interviews and letters from John Ziegler, John Grimek, Bill March, etc - indicate that experimentation with testosterone for athletic purposes began in the U.S. sometime in either late 1954 or 1955. These 'trials' were short-lived, however, as the results were disappointing and testosterone use was deemed ineffective and carried the risk of harmful side-effects. A statistical analysis of Olympic-style Weightlifting performances published in the International Journal of the History of Sport concluded that Soviet athletes likely first used testosterone sometime between 1952 and 1956.

Dr. John Ziegler, physician for the U.S. Olympic Weightlifting team (i.e. the York team), described in interviews of learning about the Soviet use of testosterone injections at the 1954 World Weightlifting Championships in Vienna, Austria in October of that year. Some time after returning home, Ziegler convinced York affiliated lifters John Grimek, Jim Park and Yaz Kuzahara to be test subjects and receive testosterone injections. By Grimek's account, the results were disappointing. In a private letter, dated at the time, Grimek spoke of seeing nothing in the way of gains and quiting the injections because he felt he was actually regressing. Jim Park received only one injection which he claimed did nothing for him physically, but made him incredibly horny. It is unclear as to Kuzahara's experience but, in any case, it was not positive enough to warrant continued use and further experimentation was ceased. In light of the terrible side effects that Ziegler had heard of and witnessed Soviet users suffering, and lack of significant results in his own test subjects, no further experimentation with testosterone was tried by the York (U.S.) Weightlifting team for the duration of the 1950s.

This was not the end of Ziegler's involvement with steroids, however. Ziegler began work with CIBA Pharmaceuticals in 1955 to develop a testosterone derivative that would carry the anabolic properties of testosterone without the undesirable side effects. Preliminary results began coming in by 1956, and Dianabol was released to the U.S. prescription drug market in 1958 for use in wasting conditions. CIBA's competitor, Searle, beat them to the market, however, and introduced Nilevar, the first synthetic anabolic/androgenic steroid, to the prescription drug market in 1956 (used as a polio treatment).

In late 1959 (some claim as early as 1958, some as late as 1960) Ziegler decided to try the new Dianabol on some of the non-medal contending York lifters and enlisted Grimek to convince a few lifters to begin taking it under his (Ziegler's) supervision. Lower level or non-competitive lifters were chosen for the initial trials so as not to risk marring the performance of medal contenders at the upcoming 1960 Olympics (Dianabol was, at that time, a relatively untested drug and York chief Bob Hoffman was said to have feared trying it on his top lifters). Bill March, Tony Garcy, John Grimek, Ziegler himself and later Lou Riecke were the first Guinea Pigs, and the results were much more promising this time around.

From there, Dianabol use quickly spread to the entire York Weightlifting team. Now, up-and-coming York lifters and Strength and Health magazine writers such as Bill Starr and Tommy Suggs started letting the secret out to the bodybuilding community, and by the early-to-mid 1960s almost all high-level competitive bodybuilders were taking steroids in the weeks leading up to contests. This pre-contest cycling scheme by bodybuilders was based on the Weightlifters' practice of escalating steroid use in the weeks leading up to lifting meets - the logic being that just as the lifters wanted to be at their best (strongest) come meet day, bodybuilders wanted to peak at their biggest on the day of the contest. It didn't take long for steroid use to spill into the 'off-season' as well, as this allowed bodybuilders to build more ultimate muscle mass.

The man who would go on to become the first Mr. Olympia, Larry Scott, gained 8 pounds of muscle in two months between the 1960 Mr. Los Angeles (in which he placed third), and the 1960 Mr. California (which he won, defeating the two men who had placed above him in the Mr. Los Angeles two months earlier). A year earlier he had won the Mr. Idaho weighing just 152 pounds. Larry credits Rheo Blair, and his protein powder, as being instrumental in his sudden improvement. However, considering Larry's dramatic gains from that point onward, and Blair's reported possession of Nilevar a few years earlier before he even moved to California, it is quite likely that this time in 1960 also marks Larry's first usage of steroids (something to which he admits but, to my knowledge, hasn't specified the date).

But the early 1960s did't mark the true origins of bodybuilder's regular use of steroids, however. In an early edition of his book Getting Stronger, Bill Pearl told of meeting Arthur Jones (founder of the Nautilus line of training equipment and father of the "HIT" style of training) in 1958 and learning of Nilevar from him. After a little further investigation, Pearl began a twelve-week cycle of the steroid and gained 25 pounds. At around that same time, Irvin Johnson (aka Rheo H. Blair - 'father' of the first protein powders) is said to have had Searle's Nilevar in his possession, though he isn't believed to have been widely distributing it to bodybuilders at that time.

So what can we gather from all of this? First of all, no bodybuilder or lifter was using synthetic steroids before 1956 - they didn't exist. Most likely, only the very highest level West Coast bodybuilders knew of them by 1958. From there it seems that knowledge of Nilevar and Dianabol to build muscle and strength was kept relatively in the closet until the early 1960s. After all, Hoffman did not want outside athletes to know his lifters' secrets and he was using their sudden gains via Dianabol to promote his supplement line and isometric training courses and racks. Bill Starr wrote that until he was a national calibre lifter with York in the early 1960s he had never heard of steroids. Reg Park (Mr. Universe 1951, 1958, 1965) said that the first he heard of them were in connection with rumours about East German and Soviet athletes during the 1960 Olympics, though he later heard of "steroids" being used on British POWs from Singapore in WWII as they were being nursed back to health in Australian hospitals. Chet Yorton (Mr. America 1966, Mr. Universe 1966, 1975) has said that he first heard of steroids (Nilevar) in 1964, and decided not to risk using them - Yorton went on to become one of the sports most outspoken campaigners against steroid use and founder of the first drug-tested, natural bodybuilding federation. The condition of national and world level bodybuilders appears to have taken a visible leap between 1960 to 1964.

As for testosterone itself, Paul de Kruif's 1945 book "The Male Hormone" is often cited as "proof" that bodybuilders knew of and were using testosterone in the 1940s. But even though testosterone had been identified by researchers and isolated in laboratory settings as early as the 1930s, it didn't receive FDA approval as a prescription drug until 1950 and, therefore, was produced only sporadically and in small batches for research purposes only, before that time. De Kruif himself made no connection between testosterone and possible athletic applications - his arguments were purely from the perspective of using testosterone to improve the vitality and health of aging men and those with specific conditions.

It has been said that John Grimek, upon reading publications such as de Kruif's, was inquiring about testosterone in the 1940s. But he would have had nothing other than a possible hunch that it could be used for athletic purposes, and no source or opportunity to experiment with it. It wasn't until 1954/1955 with Ziegler, that Grimek wrote of getting his first testosterone injections. It stands to reason that if even Grimek had no access to testosterone, and no knowledge of other top level bodybuilders or lifters using it before this - and as editor of Strength and Health magazine and second in command at York he certainly was in a position to know - then it is very unlikely that anyone in the west was using it for athletic/physique purposes before late 1954/1955. Given that these early experiments were unsuccessful and brief (likely because they knew little about dosing for increased strength and muscle mass), it is most likely that the first western bodybuilders began steroid use not with testosterone itself, but with Nilevar, sometime after 1956 to 1958. From there, Dianabol enters the picture at the elite level and by 1964 even the muscle magazines, such as Iron Man, were writing about what they called the "tissue building drugs".

For a western bodybuilder or lifter to be using testosterone before late 1954/1955 he would had to have known more about the biochemistry of testosterone and it's potential effects than any western sports physician - and have had access to what was then a relatively little known prescription drug. He would also had to have known more about how to effectively dose it than John Ziegler, who would go on to co-develop Dianabol just a few years later. As for before late 1954/1955, nobody in the west can say for sure exactly when the Soviets began using testosterone, but the likely date is sometime before October 1954 and possibly as early as 1952.

As mentioned, testosterone was first approved for prescription as a cancer, wasting and burn treatment in the U.S. in 1950. Before that it was classified as an experimental drug and not available even to physicians. For a bodybuilder to be using testosterone before 1950 he would not only had to have known more about the biochemistry, dosing and potential usage of it than anybody else in the world (including the research scientists working with it), but also have had access to what was then an experimental drug, isolated sporadically in limited amounts for controlled research purposes, and not produced in quantity.

For these reasons it can be stated with some certainty that Steve Reeves, Clancy Ross, John Grimek, Jack Delinger, Reg Park, John Farbotnik, George Eiferman, etc - who all won major physique titles before the Soviets began using testosterone and before synthetic steroids were introduced in 1956 - were not using testosterone or steroids at the time of their Mr. America, Mr. USA and Mr. Universe wins. Furthermore, it is unlikely that any major title winner was a steroid user before 1957-58 (Pearl won the Mr. USA and Mr. Universe titles in 1956 before his knowledge of Nilevar). Some athletes' careers from the era, such as Reg Park's, do span the introduction of steroids into bodybuilding. In Park's case, he competed at 214 pounds when he won the Mr. Universe title in 1951, he weighed 215 when he won it the second time in 1958, and 216 when he placed 3rd in 1971 (at age 43 - he returned again in 1973 to place 2nd). If Park did jump on the steroid bandwagon when he learned of them in 1960, then they produced one pound of muscle in 11 years for him.

what a fairy tale... Test has been around since the 30's

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #119 on: January 17, 2014, 05:30:14 PM »
what a fairy tale... Test has been around since the 30's


TheShape

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 596
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #120 on: January 17, 2014, 05:30:28 PM »
The astounding ignorance of these posts is appalling, trying their best (and failing) to discredit Steve's physique to steroid use. Have you seen the photos of him at 16? He was a genetic freak, plain and simple. You guys are just trying to justify your own use because you probably have a shit body without drugs. I'm surprised no one is talking about Leroy Colbert, his arms were ginormous all the way back in 1952.

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16475
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #121 on: January 17, 2014, 05:31:48 PM »
No it doesn't it proves there was an ad. viable steroids lol if you're gullible enough to believe that I wonder why Dr John Zeigler didn't just use them at York?  ::)


And your article proves what? All it proves is that Ziegler produced a popular steroid.

Meanwhile, we have a large ad in a popular magazine of the times advertising steroids over the counter, in an era where male virility, etc.... were hot topics as evidenced by de Kruif's book. Drugs that were proved real by FDA action.

We are to put aside the logical thought that bodybuilders may of experimented with these drugs on the basis of.... what exactly? 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #122 on: January 17, 2014, 05:32:13 PM »
The astounding ignorance of these posts is appalling, trying their best (and failing) to discredit Steve's physique to steroid use. Have you seen the photos of him at 16? He was a genetic freak, plain and simple. You guys are just trying to justify your own use because you probably have a shit body without drugs. I'm surprised no one is talking about Leroy Colbert, his arms were ginormous all the way back in 1952.

6'1" 215lbs HE'S JUICED TO THE MAX  ::)

People need him to be on , it makes them feel better about their own failures.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79324
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #123 on: January 17, 2014, 05:34:36 PM »
And your article proves what? All it proves is that Ziegler produced a popular steroid.

Meanwhile, we have a large ad in a popular magazine of the times advertising steroids over the counter, in an era where male virility, etc.... were hot topics as evidenced by de Kruif's book. Drugs that were proved real by FDA action.

We are to put aside the logical thought that bodybuilders may of experimented with these drugs on the basis of.... what exactly?  

Your ad proves there was an ad. Come back when you have something more like a convergence if evidence. Until Zeigler there is NO talk anywhere from anyone about athletes using drugs to build their physiques , it starts with him if you have something contradicting that feel free to share it.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #124 on: January 17, 2014, 05:36:22 PM »
6'1" 215lbs HE'S JUICED TO THE MAX  ::)


I personally know  6'1 , 215lbs guys  juiced to the max.