Proof you dont have to squat 
Honestly? To me this picture is the clear proof of the opposite.
You've got huge arms and you're a massive guy in general, born with the genes to become a huge bodybuilder, I'd say you could have gotten to IFBB pro size if you had taken large amounts of AAS .. most likely at least. This is not something that anyone could do or even the majority ... and yet your legs are clearly far behind your upper body. Of course not every muscle grows the same and responds to training and drugs the same but someone with an upper body like yours and on AAS should easily be able to get his legs big.
I'm not saying your legs are shit and I also think that you've posted before that huge legs are not on your wishlist anyway and that's absolutely acceptable but your statement against squats in combination with the picture you've posted holds little value. You make it sound like squats are NOT the best excersise for lower body development as well as one of the if not the best excersise overall for strength, size and functionality...
My legs have been built almost exclusively with squats, during 10 out of the 12 years that I've been working out my ONLY lower body excersises were squats, deadlifts and calf raises with 80% of my energy going into the squats. I am a guy who was born with below average genes for building muscle, my body seems to fight every ounce of new lean mass I put on and I've always had trouble packing on the meat but my quads are my strongest and biggest part.
