Author Topic: Jay Cutler was the most overrated bodybuilder of all time (Read 21851 times)

Wiggs · « **Reply #50 on:** April 27, 2014, 09:48:45 PM »

Jay is the real "Gift".

Danimal77 · « **Reply #51 on:** April 27, 2014, 09:55:59 PM »

Quote from: old-school-lifter on April 27, 2014, 09:00:02 PM

all true

Cutler, gifted because he sucked Manion and wienberger's cocks

and he was the all american, blonde, blue eyed white guy

if dennis wolf was american he'd have been a 5 time mr O by now

Even Wolf was nothing special (see, I'm not biased). I see him at the new millennium version of this man and btw, the 3rd pic of Ian destroys Jay Cutler on ALL levels, which just proves my overall point of this thread.

dyslexic · « **Reply #52 on:** April 27, 2014, 11:00:35 PM »

It was all about Jay's mug for the contracts and the judges...

Smooth as fuck... still... always

Seriously overrated and all the dudes that like him are totally on his nuts. Love or hate, no in between... as much as they'd like to be

Schnauzer · « **Reply #53 on:** April 27, 2014, 11:03:26 PM »

Sure, Jay was overrated

Mayor Of Bodybuilding · « **Reply #54 on:** April 27, 2014, 11:47:15 PM »

Jay is FOUR TIME Mr. Olympia And YOUR NOT!

The Grim Lifter · « **Reply #55 on:** April 28, 2014, 02:49:14 AM »

Quote from: Mayor Of Bodybuilding on April 27, 2014, 11:47:15 PM

Jay is FOUR TIME Mr. Olympia And YOUR NOT!

Too bad sucking muscle men's cocks doesn't improve your spelling.

ESFitness · « **Reply #56 on:** April 28, 2014, 04:09:32 AM »

Quote from: Tito24 on April 25, 2014, 10:52:43 AM

all politics, ruhl probably refused to suck dick judges.

so the guys who win must all suck dicks?

wolfrittner · « **Reply #57 on:** April 28, 2014, 04:11:59 AM »

Quote from: The Grim Lifter on April 28, 2014, 02:49:14 AM

Too bad sucking muscle men's cocks doesn't improve your spelling.

Dogma2010 · « **Reply #58 on:** April 28, 2014, 06:03:41 AM »

Quote from: Mayor Of Bodybuilding on April 27, 2014, 11:47:15 PM

Jay is FOUR TIME Mr. Olympia And YOUR NOT!

Not sure if you're serious here. This sounds like the logic of a 5 year old. Next you're going to say everyone is a hater right?

Alucard · « **Reply #59 on:** April 28, 2014, 07:23:01 AM »

Quote from: Schnauzer on April 27, 2014, 11:03:26 PM

Sure, Jay was overrated

Isn't this the BFTO 1999? His best shape by far, never ever replicated that, he looked full and dense with a decent sized waist for his standard... Started to follow the mass game and started abusing oil, only 2001 Olympia was somewhat close...

Lustral · « **Reply #60 on:** April 28, 2014, 11:23:41 AM »

Cutler used to say he had a 34" waist. Unfortunately that was the diameter.

Big Chiro Flex · « **Reply #61 on:** April 28, 2014, 11:24:59 AM »

Quote from: Lustral on April 28, 2014, 11:23:41 AM

Cutler used to say he had a 34" waist. Unfortunately that was the diameter.

A Righteous Sort · « **Reply #62 on:** April 28, 2014, 04:17:14 PM »

Jay was great, not sure what everyone is bitching about.

That Ian guy has no density. Looks like Ultimate Warrior's physique.

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #63 on:** April 28, 2014, 05:48:26 PM »

Great quote by a great man

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #64 on:** April 28, 2014, 09:00:46 PM »

Quote from: Alucard on April 28, 2014, 07:23:01 AM

Isn't this the BFTO 1999? His best shape by far, never ever replicated that, he looked full and dense with a decent sized waist for his standard... Started to follow the mass game and started abusing oil, only 2001 Olympia was somewhat close...

It's the day after the 2001 Mr. Olympia.

The Ugly · « **Reply #65 on:** April 28, 2014, 09:09:11 PM »

2001 Jay looked Olympian (except his back), the rest of his shit was a testament to how stupid this chemical pageant has become.

Dr.J · « **Reply #66 on:** April 28, 2014, 10:24:35 PM »

Jay Cutler all the way..... you shut your mouths convicts! !

Royalty · « **Reply #67 on:** April 29, 2014, 06:05:38 AM »

He wasn't overrated at the 2003 Pro Ironman

njflex · « **Reply #68 on:** April 29, 2014, 06:52:47 AM »

Quote from: Royalty on April 29, 2014, 06:05:38 AM

He wasn't overrated at the 2003 Pro Ironman

IRON MAN for a measley 10,000 purse was a landmark show,had best lighting and camera angles bar none.was very big title to win.

Royalty · « **Reply #69 on:** April 29, 2014, 07:13:31 AM »

Jay's big mistake was trying to catch Ronnie in the size department. Well, It did help him in the short run.

But in the long run, he lost the physique that he had back in 1999-2003

Icelord · « **Reply #70 on:** April 29, 2014, 09:10:55 AM »

Quote from: njflex on April 25, 2014, 07:08:44 PM

very much,here too..

Explain how he managed this condition here but never on stage.

A Righteous Sort · « **Reply #71 on:** April 29, 2014, 09:32:43 AM »

Quote from: Royalty on April 29, 2014, 07:13:31 AM

Jay's big mistake was trying to catch Ronnie in the size department. Well, It did help him in the short run.

But in the long run, he lost the physique that he had back in 1999-2003

I beg to differ.

Jay had a large and blocky structure and thus his only option was to play the "size game".

Are you saying he is supposed to compete with the likes of Dexter Jackon?

All Jay had was the ability to pack on a lot of mass, however he could not pack on as much mass as Ronnie -
this he was a perpetual second placer.

And when Ronnie slipped he was gifted a win.

Simple as that.

He definitely didn't make a mistake by playing the size game -
It was the only thing he really had going for him and he would never have earned a sandow otherwise.

njflex · « **Reply #72 on:** April 29, 2014, 09:39:24 AM »

Quote from: Icelord on April 29, 2014, 09:10:55 AM

Explain how he managed this condition here but never on stage.

HE looks good there and its not his best pose either,good lighting helps.

Royalty · « **Reply #73 on:** April 29, 2014, 09:40:57 AM »

Quote from: A Righteous Sort on April 29, 2014, 09:32:43 AM

I beg to differ.

Jay had a large and blocky structure and thus his only option was to play the "size game".

Are you saying he is supposed to compete with the likes of Dexter Jackon?

All Jay had was the ability to pack on a lot of mass, however he could not pack on as much mass as Ronnie -
this he was a perpetual second placer.

And when Ronnie slipped he was gifted a win.

Simple as that.

He definitely didn't make a mistake by playing the size game -
It was the only thing he really had going for him and he would never have earned a sandow otherwise.

I agree with you. But I feel that the blockiness that he had in 2001, looked way better than the blockiness that he had in 2010

In the long run, the blockiness became blockier.

Nails · « **Reply #74 on:** April 29, 2014, 10:09:59 AM »