Why do you claim no evidence to the contrary inidcates something is possible? Did you read the argument from ignorance excerpt I posted?
Archer. Whether
you've ever read it, is a better question.
Let me explain this to you, very carefully. I want you to understand, because I think you're an okay guy.
You've been arguing with the idea that I'd made an assertion to suggest absolute consequences (please think about that very carefully, because you're not registering it), which is in fact the
exact opposite of what I'd been doing. Right? (It is
that bad, yes)
Can you understand that, now?
You did that without identifying any particular post. You did that despite seeing the words "possible" and "possibility" perhaps dozens of times. You did that, even after saying this:
...such a possibility as being possible?
Whew. What a thread.
In other words, Archer, your argument is for someone that asserts something which would lead to absolute consequences, the exact opposite of what "possible" and possibility" express. Okay?
Now..do us both a favor, and drop the repeating post action, and respond directly.