First of all the only reason I brought up Lance Armstrong was to prove a point. The point: No matter how much you take, if you don't train and eat like a bodybuilder you will not look like one. I think the Lance Armstrong analogy worked perfectly to demonstrate this point. Thank you. And if you think Armstrong was on TRT doses and "A little HGH for recovery" lol you are very misinformed, the man was a notorious drug pig, taking tons of shit, and willing to do anything to win.
Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension skills before completely flipping out lol...You look stupid raging on about endurance athletes blah blah, when you COMPLETELY missed the point.
Try and keep up!
How would you explain the following, let's say simple simon, everyone has seen his pictures, he uses 250-500 mg weekly and is bigger than esfitness who uses 6 grams.
How do you explain that?
explain how Lance Armstrong was a 160lb twig on tons of drugs..Simple simon knows what he's doing and ES doesnt? I'm not even going there...I will say genetics is huge in this game.
Try and put it together bud.
Lmao at Lance Armstrong was on a TON of drugs....you are so fucking clueless about drug usage protocols for endurance sports.
You never took steroids, if you did you would know that 500mg of any anabolic per week for a long distance cyclist means a non race finisher lol. Lance took very small test doses in drops post race to optimise hormonal level drained by racing and aid recovery, epo a blood booster non anabolic and small gh doses for recovery.
He was tested so had to work with half lives, in endurance sports a 2/3% edge over your competitors means a crack at the podium, you still need talent and hard work which lance had a ton off.
Please come off this board if you never took AAS you imbecile.
Judging by this post I am about as well versed in their protocols as you...I never once stated any of the drugs endurance athletes run, or dosages.
But for the record:
Lance Armstrong was accused of, and admitted to taking: Testosterone, HGH, Epo, Corticosteroids, and "steroids" a blanket statement, what doses and what compounds exactly? No one except Lance and his doping coach knows.
That is a ton of drugs, but I digress because that isn't the point.
Imagine taking 50mg winstrol and climbing on a bike at solid speed sluggin it out.....within minutes your legs would pump up and burn so bad you will need to stop...TEMPER never took steroids, yet his trying to be condescending in here. I remember my first ever cycle 500mg sust and 40mg d-bol, walking for 20 minutes my calves would get pumped and burn.
Racing saps out hormones, energy muscle breakdown...etc optimising hormones is all they need to do to have an edge over a natural. A racer staying "fresh" which has talent and fearless work ethic is a strong contender to win....hence why Lance dominated.
I used Lance Armstrong as a spur of the moment example in reference to the comparison between Simplesimon and ESFitness.
Whatever else you're rambling on about is complete nonsense. Immediately jumping to the conclusion that "TEMPER never took steroids" lol...Well this is just hilarious because I very candidly and honestly listed my steroids use in an above post. Leave it to a Brit to completely miss the point, then overreact like a total moron, and start calling people out. Classic Hebrew, neanderthal-esque brain functions.
Someone could hypothetically look amazing on Lance Armstrong's drug protocol. Test, hgh, and "steroids" as stated by the Armstrong whistle blower.
You're kidding yourself if you think Armstrong was on "Just above natural levels" of test, hgh, etc...LOL "Just barely enough to recover" rofl...The dude was notorious for being crazier than everyone else with the drugs. He was competing against fellow drugged up cyclists and owning them, he was on a lot of shit..
Skorp you just got owned, have a good day.