What do I consider funny? You. Not your incredibly lame attempted humor. Your pseudo-intellectual commentary, which is often mindless, drone, simplistic left-wing gibberish.
LOL. Of course you don't think anything I say is funny, BB. I criticize you way too much for you to let your guard down long enough for real laughter. You're actually kind of a wuss, BB. Look how defensively you avoid saying what you think is funny because you fear being attacked for your taste in humor.
Seems to me that when folks criticize you unfairly, you don't care. But when they call you out for your more obvious forays into intellectual dishonesty, hypocrisy, or flat-out illogical and inconsistent reasoning, that's when you get a little pissy and start name-calling.
And me, pseudo-intellectual? Seriously? LOL I'm no sort of academic at all. That you would think that indicates your own lack of academic achievement, I think. (Either that or you've grown so used to talking with meatheads that you think there's something odd about someone who has a bigger vocabulary or better grasp of grammar than you.)
FWIW, I'm just a persnickety old logical bodybuilder who's served 4 years in the US army before going back to school, had a lot of foreign language training (in the army and in college) who now works as a "blackbox-style" QA tester for a 3rd party testing house where I mainly do performance testing and write up bugs (problems) I encounter with pre-released mobile wireless devices.
The reason I mention all of that is that I think that the way I write is reasonably appropriate for a guy with my background. In other words, I don't write for a living and think it's obvious. If you consider my writing to be even pseudo-intellectual, it means you're kinda dumb.
Now go get you shine-box, LOL.