http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/08/18/county-investigation-michael-brown-was-shot-from-the-front-had-marijuana-in-his-systemHe was doper too
Just like Ashtrayvon - a druggie, violent, looks like a thug, acts like a thug, and then the community gets upset when bad shit happens.
the microscopes are out for Darren Wilson!!!!!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/missouri-governor-declares-state-emergency-curfew-203706380.htmlJohnson stressed why resolving the unrest in Ferguson was important to him and other black families."When this is over, I'm going to go in my son's room, my black son, who wears his pants sagging, wears his hat cocked to the side, has tattoos on his arms, but that's my baby," he said."And we all ought to be thanking the Browns for Michael, because Michael is going to make it better for our sons, so they can be better black men. So they can be better for our daughters, so they can be better black women."What an idiot...
The community gets upset no matter..it's an excuse is all....
I don't know. Is it bad?
this fellows personal data is all over the internet
And what will this accomplish? What are you hoping for?
No horse in this race but I'd be surprised if he's not brought up on charges.
Who are you kidding. You obviously do have a horse in this race. Your comments clearly indicate you believe the shooting was not legal despite the strong evidence to the contrary. d
actually the point is that the evidence to the contrary is weak
http://countercurrentnews.com/2014/08/ferguson-store-owner-says-he-doesnt-believe-thats-mike-brown-on-surveillance-video/Ferguson Store Owner Says He Doesn’t Believe That’s Mike Brown On Surveillance Video August 18, 2014 1:28 am· The surveillance tapes supposedly shows Michael Brown “robbing” a Ferguson convenience store market. But in spite of the fact that the “robbery” was carried out without the brandishing of a weapon, and in spite of the fact that this was really more a case of petty theft shoplifting, this Friday, for the first time, the owners of the store have said that they never said they believed Michael Brown was the individual who stole the item from their store. In fact, while the owners are speaking out through an attorney about the surveillance video, the mainstream, corporate media are largely ignoring everything they said, pretending that this video definitively identifies Michael Brown as the strong arm shoplifter. SUBMIT AN ARTICLEPrivacy PolicyDissenting Opinion MagazineYou are here: Home » Cover-Up Ferguson Store Owner Says He Doesn’t Believe That’s Mike Brown On Surveillance Video August 18, 2014 1:28 am· by The surveillance tapes supposedly shows Michael Brown “robbing” a Ferguson convenience store market. But in spite of the fact that the “robbery” was carried out without the brandishing of a weapon, and in spite of the fact that this was really more a case of petty theft shoplifting, this Friday, for the first time, the owners of the store have said that they never said they believed Michael Brown was the individual who stole the item from their store. In fact, while the owners are speaking out through an attorney about the surveillance video, the mainstream, corporate media are largely ignoring everything they said, pretending that this video definitively identifies Michael Brown as the strong arm shoplifter. The owners claim that this is a claim the police have come up with on their own. For his part, Dorian Johnson, a witness to the shooting of Michael Brown, has reportedly confessed to being with Brown in the convenient store. But for now, that has not been corroborated by the store owner, employees or eye witnesses. As well, we are not hearing this from Johnson himself, so a number of questions remain.Through their attorney, the owner of the store also even dispute the claim that they or an employee called 911. They say that a customer inside the store made the call. This is pretty strange if this was indeed a “robbery”. As well, in addition to clarifying that they never said they believed, nor identified the suspect with Michael Brown, they claimed that the St. Louis County issued the warrants for the hard drive of surveillance video Friday, based on the police claiming that Brown fit the description of the person in the video… the person who the owners and employees of the store were not even going to call the police on. Again, the owner clarifies that neither the management, nor any employee ever identified Brown as the suspect in that video. They simply never said they believed that, this was a claim made by the police alone.
kinda the theme in this thread...Ni66.er robs store,police stop Ni66.erPolice Shoot ni66.erNo harm no foul...except the fact that the clothes were different, and the Owner said it wasnt him,but hey... no harm no foul
