100 Dead Blacks vs 5000 Dead Blacks - what gets more coverage?

[Roger Bacon]

Most blacks who are killed are killed by blacks.
Most whites who are killed are killed by whites.

cute

[Archer77]

It's even worse than we thought. According to Al they're actually going out of their way to disproportionately kill white people.  

Seems like it.  

[Al Doggity]

cute

... and accurate.

[Archer77]

... and accurate.

But more blacks kill whites and if proximity is the reason they must be seeking out whites. 

[Al Doggity]

But more blacks kill whites and if proximity is the reason they must be seeking out whites. 

"...murder is predominately a crime of proximity"

Meaning most of the time, meaning in most cases, meaning a majority of the time.

[Archer77]

"...murder is predominately a crime of proximity"

Meaning most of the time, meaning in most cases, meaning a majority of the time.

So your admitting that blacks are seeking out whites to murder or if whites  happen to be in their proximity  they choose whites far more often than whites choose blacks within the same proximity

[Al Doggity]

So your admitting that blacks are seeking out whites to murder or if whites  happen to be in their proximity  they choose whites far more often than whites choose blacks within the same proximity

Or maybe I'm saying that murder is a crime of proximity in the majority of cases and in other cases it is not.  

[Shockwave]

So.... al logic....

Blacks kill blacks

Whites kill whites

EXCEPT when living near each other, then blacks kill blacks AND whites,  while whites tend to only kill whites.

Reasonable conclusion = blacks are far more prone to kill anyone around them, byt ESPECIALLY whites given the opportunity.

Just going by Als logic.

Also, als logic of proximity seems to suggest thay seegregation is in order to prevent blacks from killing whites disproportionately.

Just going by his logic.

[Archer77]

Or maybe I'm saying that murder is a crime of proximity in the majority of cases and in other cases it is not.  

So in those other cases blacks are targeting whites? Going out of their "proximity" to find them?

[JOHN MATRIX]

What is staggering is that blacks commit assaults against whites twenty-fives more than whites on blacks.  In terms of aggravated assault, the number is two-hundred times more. The National Crime Victimization Survey reported approximately 13,000 black-on-white rapes and 39,000 black-on-white robberies – both violent crimes. The statistics show that the number of white on black rapes and violent robberies were so small that they had to be rounded to the nearest whole number, and that whole number was zero.  This is the reality we live in and not the fantasy land perpetuate by fools where racist white cops killing blacks is an epidemic.

End thread.

Anything else is just emotional- based pushing of agendas and false narratives.


Also id bet the vast majority of those 100 blacks shot by cops were directly involved in criminal actions by the black including attacking the cop in the first place...not the 'racist executions' they want to make u think

[Al Doggity]

End thread.

Anything else is just emotional- based pushing of agendas and false narratives.


Also id bet the vast majority of those 100 blacks shot by cops were directly involved in criminal actions by the black including attacking the cop in the first place...not the 'racist executions' they want to make u think

Those statistics are not accurate.

[Al Doggity]

So in those other cases blacks are targeting whites? Going out of their "proximity" to find them?

People commit murders for a variety of reasons.

[Archer77]

Those statistics are not accurate.

How about these stats.  49.4% for murder and nonnegligent homicide and 32.5% forcible rapes for blacks. Whites are at 48% and 65%.  However,  hispanics and middle easterners are included in the total for whites skewing the numbers upwards.  So, a population of black males which is less than half of the total number of blacks in the unit3d statesis committing a disproportionate number of rapes and murders. Who are they murdering and raping?  Cant all be black.


http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf

[Archer77]

People commit murders for a variety of reasons.

But they disproportionately kill whites

[tonymctones]

No, that would not be racist. Not by any definition.

Hahah and thus gentlemen you see the stupidity of the libtard in full effect

[Al Doggity]

Hahah and thus gentlemen you see the stupidity of the libtard in full effect

Great, Retardo is here! I was about to tune out hahaha! Posting stats that are wrong or make no sense is usually your  steez, so I'm glad you're not feeling left out.

[Soul Crusher]

http://threepercenternation.com/2014/08/video-what-this-young-black-man-did-while-the-looting-in-ferguson-is-unbelievable/

[tonymctones]

Great, Retardo is here! I was about to tune out hahaha! Posting stats that are wrong or make no sense is usually your  steez, so I'm glad you're not feeling left out.

Lol so let's get it straight fat Albert.

Stopping a person bc they are a part of a demographic that commits a disproportionately higher amount of crime is racist.

But stopping a person for no other reason other than their skin color is not racist.

Got it!!!

Liberalism must be bliss

[Soul Crusher]

Lol so let's get it straight fat Albert.

Stopping a person bc they are a part of a demographic that commits a disproportionately higher amount of crime is racist.

But stopping a person for no other reason other than their skin color is not racist.

Got it!!!

Liberalism must be bliss

 

[Al Doggity]

Lol so let's get it straight fat Albert.

Stopping a person bc they are a part of a demographic that commits a disproportionately higher amount of crime is racist.

But stopping a person for no other reason other than their skin color is not racist.

Got it!!!

Liberalism must be bliss

You're stupid as ever.
Where did I say that people should be stopped for no other reason than their skin color?

[Al Doggity]

Cram it. You know this guy's an idiot.

[Archer77]

You're stupid as ever.
Where did I say that people should be stopped for no other reason than their skin color?

You want more whites to be stopped when all the facts indicate they arent the demographic overwhelmingly committing gun crimes. 

[Al Doggity]

You want more whites to be stopped when all the facts indicate they arent the demographic overwhelmingly committing gun crimes. 

Please quote the post where I said I wanted more whites to be stopped.

[tonymctones]

You're stupid as ever.
Where did I say that people should be stopped for no other reason than their skin color?

I never said you thought ppl should be, what you did at though is that if it happend to white people it wouldn't be racist

[Archer77]

The phrasing itself is specious! The "stopping more white people" would only come about as a result of IGNORING race, not by singling out whites, as well as blacks and asians. Because you can't single out everybody. Already, as it stands, these stop and frisks aren't incredibly effective at catching criminals. If their purpose is largely, then broadening the scope would not change that.

Ignoring race automatically leads to the unnecessary stopping of law abiding whites and asians.  Your suggestion defacto calls for the stopping more whites and asians.