Your reasoning makes zero sense, and so does answering your stupid question. I'm not Jeebus, so I can't make a blind man see.
Neither can "Jeebus".
In other words, void of a coherent (or decent) point, you continue to sound like a bumbling fool.
Bingo, nothing!
Try that again. Your claims are that Heath's structure is bad? Yet, when asked specifically for what is his structure bad (i.e. winning titles, adding mass, etc), the only thing you can do bleat out absurdities and call people names.
One would think you could give a better answer than basically, "I JUST THINK HEATH IS YUCKY!!" But, consider the source.