Author Topic: Who could win on genetics alone?????  (Read 9858 times)

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2006, 08:09:51 AM »
Vic Richards
$

Snotroot

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 271
  • Burn bitches !!
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2006, 08:17:14 AM »
I gotta say Greg Valentino.  He had something going before all that synthol juice ruined his body.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2006, 08:20:41 AM »
Ya vic was already bigger than everyone without touching a wieght as a teenager!
just push some weight!

Snotroot

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 271
  • Burn bitches !!
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2006, 08:22:30 AM »
Vic Richards
Is he the dude from the Green mile?

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2006, 08:31:23 AM »
no that Micheal Duncan Clark
just push some weight!

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2006, 08:33:02 AM »
No that's Tom Hanks.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2006, 09:03:02 AM »
No that's Tom Hanks.



Monster Triceps

bigbalddaddy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2006, 11:40:06 AM »
This seems to be a good topic with the latest issue over certain pros getting out of the main stream to take care of themself.  I personally have only seen shawn in the off off season and know that he still looks incredible without being on anything and think his genetics are bar none.  I know Kevin's latest movie physique is looking up there too.  As far as Jay and Paul, the GH belly has gone to far and by the time the FULL pump goes back to normal and the belly don't, I dispute whether or not they would have a pleasing look on "genetics" alone!  I personally say Shawn all the way!

Erol brown

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #33 on: February 16, 2006, 02:03:46 PM »
RONNIE ALL DAY LONG

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2006, 02:33:11 PM »
Quote
I gotta say Greg Valentino.  He had something going

They question was who could win, not who could look like an idiot.

MRMD2003

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 299
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2006, 05:19:03 PM »
I WOULD HAVE TO SAY LEVRONE. I USED TO TRAIN WITH HIM AT HIS OLD GYM. THE GUY HAS GRREAT GENETICS. THE GUY WOULD TRAIN FOR 12 WEEKS OUT OF THE YEAR AND SMOKE GUYS WHO HAVE TRAINED ALL YEAR ROUND TAKING GEAR. HIS LAST SHOW (03' OLYMPIA), HE ONLY TRAINED FOR 6 WEEKS ANSTILL PLACED IN THE TOP 6.

bigbalddaddy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: Who could win on genetics alone?????
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2006, 05:24:49 PM »
I WOULD HAVE TO SAY LEVRONE. I USED TO TRAIN WITH HIM AT HIS OLD GYM. THE GUY HAS GRREAT GENETICS. THE GUY WOULD TRAIN FOR 12 WEEKS OUT OF THE YEAR AND SMOKE GUYS WHO HAVE TRAINED ALL YEAR ROUND TAKING GEAR. HIS LAST SHOW (03' OLYMPIA), HE ONLY TRAINED FOR 6 WEEKS ANSTILL PLACED IN THE TOP 6.

And was still saucing.  Not take anything away from Kevin, but we are talking about natural genetics.  His body obviously responded extremely well from goodies.  I only chose shawn over him because I like his lines & physique better.