Author Topic: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:  (Read 4777 times)

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2014, 09:28:08 PM »
Well, well, well, ... I'm so not surprised at the ignorance we see in this thread, ...but hey, ...it's to be expected.

The facts of the matter are these

This was NOT a "terrorist" attack as framed by various sources, ...and ISIL has not come to Canada. Terrorism in Canada has a history of being homegrown from FLQ terrorists in the 1970s to Justin Bourque in June 2014.

Last week's shooting was a criminal act committed by an unstable, homeless crack head.

A crackhead who had previously been kicked out of a Mosque in British Columbia for attitudes in conflict with the mosque with regards to mosque policies. The mosque had a policy of being open to non-Muslims, and allowing them to come in and learn about Islam. He objected to this openess, and felt the mosque should exclude everyone except Muslims. In addition to this, and other objectionable behaviour which culminated in his stealing from the mosque, the mosque kicked him out.

He once assaulted a McDonald's restaurant employee, then took money from the till, then patiently sat out front of the restaurant he'd just robbed, waiting for the Police to arrive whereupon he immediately confessed to his actions and further informed them he was a crack addict. He was a mentally unstable crack head who fell through the cracks of the Canadian social safety net. (no pun intended) 

He was homegrown Quebecois who was angry, frustrated, upset, and mentally unstable.

The narrative of an ISIL inspired terrorist attack was quickly stitched together, and Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent (victim of a hit 'n run a few days earlier) was quickly linked to the event after the fact, to bolster the Prime Minister's upcoming narrative. In the case of Patrice Vincent, we haven't heard the driver's side of the story. Did he accidently hit him, panick, and take off? ...rolling his car in the ditch because he was so freaked out after just hitting two human beings? We'll never know because the police shot and killed him.

Harper wasn't my first choice for Prime Minister, ...but I won't credit him with being behind a satanic sacrifice at our war memorial. I will say the target and the symbology and the whole "official narrative" wraps up a little too neatly for my liking.

Thankfully, Canadians are not stupid. We've had the horrific benefit of a front row seat to the macabre theatre of madness on display in other countries that have been affected by terrorism. We don't easily lose our marbles or our values as a result of state-sponsored terrorism. We're Canadians, we don't pee our pants or tend towards wild speculation. We pride ourselves on cultural awareness, and because of this, we've built and share a pretty darned amazing country.

Despite whatever coverage you may hear in the USA, know this... we Canadians are as defiant as ever. We are as proud of ourselves, our culture of inclusiveness, our level headedness, and our abilities to deal with the threat of terrorism from whatever source without losing our values, principals, humanity, or intelligence. We are the true North, Strong & Free !!!




 
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2014, 09:34:14 PM »
Ottawa shooting: Canadian Muslims denounce attacks
Muslim groups respond to the Ottawa shooting

CBC News Posted: Oct 23, 2014 1:41 PM ET Last Updated: Oct 23, 2014 11:57 PM ET

Canadian Muslim groups have condemned the two deadly attacks this week, saying the incidents have no connection to Islam or its beliefs.

Michael Zehaf-Bibeau shot and killed a guard at the National War Memorial in Ottawa on Wednesday before launching an attack in the Centre Block of the Parliament Buildings.

This came two days after Martin Couture-Rouleau, struck and killed a Canadian Forces member with a vehicle. Police had said Couture-Rouleau had been recently "radicalized."

Ihsaan Gardee, the executive director of the National Council of Canadian Muslims, denounced the attacks in a news conference on Thursday. He said an attack on one Canadian represented an attack on all Canadians.

"We stand united with Canadians in categorically condemning these cowardly and heinous acts. Our message to anyone who believes in violent extremist ideologies is that you have nothing to do with Islam," Gardee said.

'Our message to anyone who believes in violent extremist ideologies is that you have nothing to do with Islam.'
—Ihsaan Gardee, National Council of Canadian Muslims
"You have nothing to do with the noble principles of our faith, which categorically condemns the taking of innocent life."

One Ottawa imam said he worried the incident, one unlike any other that’s happened in Ottawa before, would change the city and its residents’ attitudes.

​"I hope we are not going to change too much as far as our safety is concerned and as far as our freedom is concerned, but our safety was affected, "said imam Sikander Hashmi from the Kanata Muslim Association on CBC Radio’s Ottawa Morning,

​"It definitely feels very different. It’s actually making me feel very sad."

Ottawa police Chief Charles Bordeleau sent out a letter that encouraged building the relationships between ethnic groups over breaking them. He also said police are aware of potential concerns for Muslim groups.

​"This is about one individual who committed a despicable act," Bordeleau said, "I want to reassure [groups] should there be any backlash that they notify us.… We are there to continue to support them."

Muslims angry after shooting

Also on Wednesday night, a group of Ottawa imams met to discuss the community response to the shooting. Hashmi said the mood was sombre, and the meeting was dominated by mixed emotions.

Ihsaan Gardee speaks on Ottawa shooting
Ihsaan Gardee, the executive director of the National Council of Canadian Muslims, denounced the Ottawa shooting in a news conference on Thursday, Oct. 23, 2014 with other Muslim community members. (CBC)

"There was a lot of unanimous sadness around the table as well as disbelief and perhaps even some anger. I am definitely feeling angry,” he said. “There is some concern regarding how people are going to react to something like this."

"Sometimes people react emotionally, and sometimes I think the fear is that a Muslim person could be at the receiving end of that anger."

Hashmi called the shooting a "brazen attempt" to attack Canadians and Canada and an attempt to "instil fear and divisions within us."

But he said everybody, no matter what religion, wants to do whatever they can to keep Canada safe.

Habib Nasrallah, a civilian member of the RCMP in Ottawa, also reached out to CBC News to share his thoughts on radicalized individuals. He wanted to make it clear Islam does not condone terrorist activity.

"There are Muslims out there who are not insane, who understand Islam the way it should be understood," he said. "Those who are doing this, they want to turn us into barbarians, like animals trapped in a cage."

Also on Wednesday, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at Canada condemned the attack on Parliament Hill and the one in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que.

"These acts of terror have no basis in any religion," the statement read. "Our thoughts and prayers are with the deceased, and we offer our heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of the soldier who gave his life."

A Toronto-area Muslim student group from York University also released a statement saying it has started a campaign against radicalized youth, called "Stop the Crisis."

See 5 different videos at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-shooting-canadian-muslims-denounce-attacks-1.2810489
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2014, 09:37:21 PM »
From Mother Jones...

Canada's Coverage of the Ottawa Shootings Put American Cable News to Shame
—James West on Wed. October 22, 2014 5:28 PM PDT


The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation today gave a master class in calm, credible breaking-news reporting.


Police set up a perimeter near Parliament Hill, in Ottawa, Canada.
Errol Mcgilhon/QMI Agency/ZUMA


Anchored by the unflappable Peter Mansbridge, news of the shootings in Ottawa unfolded live on the CBC much like they do here in the United States: lots of sketchy details, conflicting reports, unreliable witnesses, and a thick fog of confusion. All of that was familiar. What was less familiar was how Mansbridge and his team managed that confusion, conveying a concise and fact-based version of fast-moving events to viewers across Canada and the world.

This live bit of level-headed reporting by Mansbridge, from around 11:10 a.m. Wednesday, should be given to journalism students around the country. It basically contains everything you need to know about why CBC did its audience proud:

MANSBRIDGE: And so, the situation is, as we say, tense and unclear. And it's on days like this—we keep reminding you of this and it's important—it's on days like this, where a story takes a number of different pathways, a number of changes occur, and often rumors start in a situation like this. We try to keep them out of our coverage, but when they come, sometimes from official sources, like members of Parliament, you tend to give them some credence. But you carefully weigh it with what we're also witnessing. It's clear that the situation is not over. It is clear the police are in an intense standby situation and continue to be on the lookout, and until somebody blows the all-clear on this we will continue to stay on top of it and watch as the events unfold.



The broadcast was deliberative and deferential to the facts even when they were sparse. Exacting and painstaking, but never slow or boring, Mansbridge weighed the credibility of every detail, constantly framing and reframing what we knew and, most crucially, how we knew it. He literally spoke the news as it happened, using his experience not to opine nor fill the gaps in his knowledge, but to provide the necessary support for his team's reporting.

Getting things wrong during fast-moving live coverage is, of course, common. Coverage of the Washington Navy Yard shooting last year got the details wrong early and often: It misstated the perpetrator's name, age, and how many guns he had. Following the Boston Marathon bombing in April 2013, there was false coverage about the identity of the bombers, and anonymous sources leading journalists to nonexistent bombs and arrests. On the Media's handy "breaking news consumer's handbook" is a great roundup of the reporting errors that get repeated every time there is a mass shooting.

No newscast, especially live news, is immune to mistakes, and during the initial haze of leads and counterleads, it's easy to point fingers. But for the six-some hours of CBC broadcasting I watched off-and-on (mostly on) today, I never once felt lost in the wall-to-wall speculation that has characterized so many recent breaking-news broadcasts in the United States.

It seems like others on Twitter agree that CBC did pretty damn well today:

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2014/10/cbc-ottawa-shootings-cable-news
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #28 on: October 31, 2014, 09:55:10 PM »
Kevin Vickers, Canada's Badass National Hero, Is a Portrait of Humility
Sergeant at arms who took down an alleged terrorist built a career on smarts and cultural awareness.


—By Jenna McLaughlin | Thu Oct. 23, 2014 3:40 PM EDT



Kevin Vickers, Canada's sergeant at arms since 2006, is being heralded worldwide as a national hero after he reportedly shot and killed an armed assailant in the nation's Parliament building Wednesday morning. It was a highly emotional moment when Vickers returned to Parliament today—watch the video above—and was greeted with an extended standing ovation. Witnesses are convinced that Vickers, 58, prevented a large-scale massacre in Ottawa. And though he has not yet spoken publicly about his actions (he's notoriously modest), his record of public service is proof enough of his exceptional character.

Delivering milk in indigenous communities as a kid helped Vickers peacefully resolve a fishing standoff that could have turned violent.

Eight years ago, Vickers celebrated his election as the House of Commons' top cop by traveling in style from Ottawa to New Brunswick on a brand new Harley. "As a gift, his two daughters bought him a vanity licence plate with the letters SGTATRMS," wrote Bea Vongdouangchanh of The Hill Times. But his career began nearly three decades earlier as a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (the "Mounties"), who are responsible for policing provincial and criminal cases while monitoring Canadian internal security. 

The Mounties were convened in 1873, in part to monitor and deal with Americans who were trading with Native Americans in Canada—cheap whiskey for buffalo hides. Today, the force focuses on issues like organized crime and national security, and has jurisdiction in eight provinces, three territories, 184 aboriginal communities, and three international airports. Vickers signed up almost 40 years ago, and spent 29 years on the force—a true-blue local boy from small town Miramichi who moved up in the ranks over time.

In 2000, he was put in charge of the Burnt Church Crisis, a heated battle in which Canadian fishermen destroyed hundreds of indigenous people's lobster traps. The Native lobstermen retaliated by trashing fish-processing plants. The Mounties were called in to deal with the tense standoff and resolved it peacefully thanks to Vickers' "thorough assessment" and "measured response," according to an account from a book on Canadian policing. In an interview with his hometown paper, Vickers credited his experience delivering milk in Burnt Church and Neguac during summer vacations as vital to his understanding the region's people—which helped him deal with both sides of the crisis respectfully.

Vickers was also involved in several high-profile investigations involving murders, drug crimes, and a tainted Red Cross blood supply. By the end of his term with the Mounties, he held the title of chief superintendent.

As sergeant at arms, Vickers defended the right of Sikhs to wear their ceremonial daggers in Parliament.

In 2005, he joined the House of Commons as director of security operations, and a year later was elected sergeant at arms. From the start, Vickers led the charge on the development of Canada's "bias-free policing strategy"—now a part of RCMP officer training—by reaching out to the Canadian Muslim community to discuss cultural sensitivity. He served a security guard for the Queen of Canada herself, and was awarded the Queen's Jubilee Medal to "honor contributions and achievements made by Canadians," according to an official fact sheet. He also received the Canada 125 Medal and the RCMP Long Service Medal. The United States has offered Vickers a commendation for his "Outstanding Contribution to Drug Enforcement."

Vickers has remained humble despite his many plaudits—he insists he's just doing his job. A 2011 feature on Vickers in The Globe and Mail describes how he defended the right of people to wear the kirpan—a ceremonial dagger carried by baptized Sikhs—in the National Assembly. In response, the World Sikh Organization hosted a dinner in his honor. He spoke with The Globe and Mail about why he stood up for the Sikhs:

"As we go forward, we should ask ourselves what Canada should be when it grows up…We have a long way to go before reaching adulthood. The seizure of the kirpans at the Quebec legislature last winter demonstrates the challenges that lay before us as we continue on this journey of sewing together the fabric of our nation with the thread of multiculturalism. Perhaps it would be beneficial for our country, as a nation, to define its core values. What are the core values of Canada, what makes up the soul and heart of our nation?…I told them [Canadian officials] that if they made me their sergeant-at-arms, there would be no walls built around Canada's Parliamentary buildings...and the fact that you may wear your kirpans within the House of Commons proves there are no walls around Parliament and I have kept my promise."





http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/10/after-parliament-tragedy-canada-celebrates-longtime-national-badass-kevin-vickers



IMO, Here we are 141 years later, and it appears our Mounties are STILL dealing with unwanted American imports, ...and true patriot love lives in the hearts & minds of all Canadians as we continue to stand on guard.
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #29 on: October 31, 2014, 10:00:10 PM »
Canadians React To Ottawa Shooting




York University student experiences Ottawa-shooting related violent attack in murdered corporal's hometown


Canadians React To Ottawa Shooting




http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/10/29/omar-albach-islam-video-canada_n_6066622.html
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2014, 10:11:11 PM »
Canada's Official Opposition Leader says Ottawa Shooter was a criminal, not a terrorist

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair says terrorism is not the right word to describe last week’s attack on Parliament Hill.

Members of Parliament gathered for their weekly caucus meetings Wednesday morning exactly one week from the time a man with a rifle stormed Parliament’s Centre Block after killing Corporal Nathan Cirillo who was standing guard at the National War Memorial.

“Frankly the information that is now available to the public comforts me in my choice not to use the word terrorism in describing the act that took place here,” Mr. Mulcair told reporters following Wednesday’s meeting.

“It doesn’t take away from the horror of what took place. It doesn’t make it any less criminal but I think there’s a distinction to be used and when you look at the background of the individual and what was actually going on that the use of that word was not the appropriate one. That’s our point of view. That’s my point of view.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/mulcair-says-ottawa-shooter-a-criminal-not-a-terrorist/article21367392/



Canadian politicians were back in the House of Commons doing Canada's business.
Here's what they had to say within 24 hours of the attack.


Centre - Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau (and hopefully our next Prime Minister)





Left Wing - NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair




w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #31 on: November 02, 2014, 02:21:43 PM »


October surprise?  Who benefits politically in USA?


...or in Canada?  ;)

I certainly wasn't thinking about it as a false flag, CT event.  (Even though there's a lot of indicators we fed ISIS just like we built al-quida in its early days).

An october surprise doesn't have to be an inside job.  it can be ANY event late in october which pushes things for one party or another.

IMO, an ISIS attack "over here", on our friendly canadian neighbors, is a huge deal.  Suddenly, Boehnner's decision to "hold off on ISIS until after campaign (oct), after election (nov), after holiday (dec) and after inaugurations (jan) seem like a really bad idea.  I don't think anyone here will disagree.

Obama, will he benefit?  He certainly hasn't been awesome in dealing with them, but dropping a shitload of bombs on their heads was better than "nothing" that Congress proposed.  Perhaps the biggest criticism on obama will be "you didn't drop enough bombs" or even "suddenly people support boots on the ground" - Which may have been obama's wet dream all along, but he didn't want to upset his own base with that idea.

Either way, it's still unfolding, and it could be any idiots starting the battles up there. But *IF* it ends up that ISIS can get their hands on guns, in canada, and pull off 3 deadly attacks simultaneously, that WILL scare some Americans.  And suddenly all the congressmen that were silent on ISIS for weeks now will be up in arms that we're not doing enough.  "Just waiting until Feb or March" just might not fly anymore.  :(


Fmr. Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the man who many Canadians (myself included) view as "The Father of our Country" was a man who knew how to effectively deal with & quell homegrown terrorism. We've had radical homegrown terrorism on our soil in the 70's and Trudeau squashed it, as well as effectively addressed the issues that led rise to it.

His protegé Jean Crétien, who later became Prime Minister from 1993 to 2003 opposed Canada's participation in the US led invasion of Iraq due to the intelligence we had regarding Saddam Hussein and Iraq that indicated those calling for war against Iraq were not being truthful with the International community. During that time Stephen Harper was the opposition leader, and was one of the fiercest Canadian proponents for War in Iraq. He gave a very impassioned plea in the House of Commons (albeit a plagiarized speech from Australian Prime Minister John Howard). Crétien said NO, and Canadians said NO. Our military was not to be used to wage aggressive wars overseas on countries to steal resources, effect regime change or further someone else's interests or an oil industry agenda.

Canada recently announced it would be participating in the mission against ISIL. This announcement of Canadian involvement in this mission against ISIL did not come about through our democratic Canadian Parliamentary process, ...but rather by edict from one man; The Prime Minister. Canadians and other Parliamentarians discovered this via The Wall Street Journal. Perhaps this was one of the reasons so many Canadians were opposed to Harper in the first place, and were quite fearful of what he might do should he get a majority Government. Since May 2011 Canadians have been seeing exactly what Prime Minister Harper has been doing with his majority of seats in Parliament.

Today, Pierre Elliot Trudeau's son Justin Trudeau, now leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, proudly carries on that tradition by opposing Harper's desire to take Canadian soldiers into a combat role against ISIL in Iraq... and Canadians stand with him, ...as does our Official Opposition leader Thomas Mulcair, as well as Fmr Prime Minister Jean Crétien

(Justin's speech made over a month ago, and delivered on the floor in the House of Commons)

Justin Trudeau berates Harper over ISIS mission
 
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Shots fired in Canadian Parliament building:
« Reply #32 on: November 02, 2014, 02:28:50 PM »
Jean Chrétien defends Trudeau’s opposition to Iraq combat mission
STEVEN CHASE AND DANIEL LEBLANC
OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail


Published Thursday, Oct. 16 2014, 6:13 PM EDT
Last updated Friday, Oct. 17 2014, 5:10 AM EDT


Former prime minister Jean Chrétien is defending Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s controversial decision to oppose Canada’s air combat mission in Iraq, saying the fighter planes the Harper government is deploying are a “very marginal” response to the crisis caused by Islamic State militants.

“I believe the best ‎contribution Canada can make is by engaging in massive, not token, humanitarian assistance. It is why in answer to the questions asked of me, I support the position of Justin Trudeau,” Mr. Chrétien writes in a column to be published in Friday's Globe and Mail.

The show of support represents a rare public statement from Mr. Chrétien who has largely avoided the spotlight since leaving office in 2003.

The office of Mr. Trudeau was informed of the content of the letter ahead of its publication, and quickly welcomed the endorsement.

“We are pleased to have Prime Minister Chrétien's support on such an important issue, with which he is so familiar,” Liberal spokeswoman Kate Purchase said in a statement.

Mr. Trudeau has been mocked by his rivals, and criticized in the media, for his handling of the Iraq matter and his failure to stake a clear position on the divisive debate. In particular, a number of commentators have contrasted the Liberal position, which called for a military intervention of a “non-combat nature,” with the NDP’s clear position against the deploying warplanes to join a U.S.-led air strike campaign against Islamic State forces in Iraq.

Mr. Chrétien is now stepping in with his own counter proposal, presumably one the Liberals will embrace.

The former prime minister says Canada should instead contribute $100-million to the World Food Program to feed refugees displaced by the extremist jihadists.

And, Mr. Chrétien adds, Ottawa should commit to providing a home for 50,000 refugees fleeing Islamic State militants, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) .

The former prime minister, who while in power refused to join the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, says Canadians regularly congratulate him for this decision. That decision proved popular as the U.S. became bogged down in Iraq, ultimately losing nearly 4,500 soldiers to the conflict, which also left another 32,200 Americans wounded.

“There is one sentence that I hear over and over again: ‘Mr. Chrétien, thank you for keeping us out of war in Iraq’,” Mr. Chrétien writes.

“It is gratifying to hear because that decision more than ten years ago was not easy. The country was divided. Many columnists, pundits and editorialists were in favour of participating in the war,” he says, noting Stephen Harper was among the pro-war ranks.

“No one was louder ... than Stephen Harper, then leader of the Opposition. He even went on American television and wrote in the Wall Street Journal denouncing the policy of the Canadian government,” Mr. Chrétien said.

“The legacy of Western colonialism in the Middle East had not been forgotten and was only exacerbated by the Western military intervention in Iraq in 2003 with the consequences we face today. Unfortunately Mr. Harper did not understand that history in 2003 and does not understand it today.

“‎No one underestimates ISIS or its particular brand of barbarism,” Mr. Chrétien writes.

“But the issue is what is the best way to combat it and what is the best contribution Canada can make. ‎If the military intervention is seen in the region as just another knee jerk Western show of force, we all know what the long-term consequences will be,” he said.

“A wrong decision, like invading Iraq in 2003, can have disastrous results that reverberate for years, as we have seen. The rise of ISIS today is in large part a result of that war.”

Canada is sending six fighter jets, two surveillance planes and a refuelling aircraft to participating in bombing attacks on Islamic State forces that have wreaked havoc across Iraq and imposed their own vicious interpretation of Islam.

Mr. Chrétien said this won’t significantly affect the conflict in Iraq.

“I have enormous‎ admiration for the men and women in the Canadian armed forces. But the reality today is that the Canadian military contribution that the Harper government has authorized will be very marginal.”

Mr. Chrétien flatly dismissed Mr. Harper’s contention that opting out of combat in Iraq means sitting on the sidelines.

“He is absolutely wrong,” the former prime minister said of the Conservative Leader.

“‎ISIS has created a massive humanitarian crisis in the region,” he said. “Hundreds of thousands of people, men, women, and children have been displaced. Neighbouring countries are dealing with floods of refugees. The World Food Programme is almost out of funds and winter is approaching.”

Mr. Chrétien said Canada has a history of enormous generosity towards refugees.

‎”For well over 50 years it has been the Canadian way to open our hearts, our doors, and our wallets to victims of great upheavals, whether Hungarians in the 1950s, Ugandans in the 1970s, Vietnamese boat people in the 1980s, or refugees from former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. And I am always thrilled by their great contribution to Canada once they come to our shores,” he said.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/jean-cretien-defends-trudeaus-opposition-of-iraq-combat-mission/article21134448



Is this the chickens coming home to roost because of Canada's military intervention in the Middle East?

Some have speculated this attack was not in retaliation for it, but an effort to bolster support for it.

One of our most popular Prime Ministers a man who successfully combat homegrown terrorism, finally set the issue of Quebec Sovereignty to rest, demolished the deficits, averted potentially disastrous banking alliances, won unprecedented resounding back to back majority Governments, and kept Canadians out of a quagmire in the Middle East came out in support of Justin Trudeau's stance against a combat military role.

His view were published across Canada on a Friday, ...and the following Wednesday... We Canadians lost a much beloved native son in front of our own National War Memorial in our nation's capital.

At this juncture, we don't know if those in the latter camp of thought are correct. If they are however, the entity behind this attempted Canadian Pearl Harbor have grossly underestimated the Canadian spirit!

We Canadians are not stupid, and we are not reactionary. Our eyes are wide open, and we stand as strong, as defiant, and as committed to our values & principals as ever before. We Are Canadians!!!
w