Net Neutrality - Anyone disagree with this?

[oldtimer1]

Not if the Republicans have anything to do with it.

Will you stop with the lies about the Republicans. Comcast the biggest player in the game and is firmly connected to the Democrats. Don't show me the chump change they donated to the Republicans as proof they are neutral.

No Republicans are not against neutrality. As I said before everyone is for it but it's their version. Net neutrality is really a yes or a no answer. Not a yes but with these restrictions.

[The True Adonis]

Will you stop with the lies about the Republicans. Comcast the biggest player in the game and is firmly connected to the Democrats. Don't show me the chump change they donated to the Republicans as proof they are neutral.

No Republicans are not against neutrality. As I said before everyone is for it but it's their version. Net neutrality is really a yes or a no answer. Not a yes but with these restrictions.

What fucking planet are you living on?  The Republicans voted in 2011 to END Net Neutrality. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/business/media/09broadband.html

House Votes Against ‘Net Neutrality’

[Voice of Doom]

"The Internet makes it hard to govern" - Joe Biden

[dr.chimps]

What fucking planet are you living on?  The Republicans voted in 2011 to END Net Neutrality. 

Guy has to be a gimmick. No real person could truly achieve old-agedness being so ignorant. Would have got hit by a bus at 8, or something. 

[_aj_]

What fucking planet are you living on?  The Republicans voted in 2011 to END Net Neutrality. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/business/media/09broadband.html

House Votes Against ‘Net Neutrality’

You have yet to prove:

1.) there is a problem
2.) there is a problem that the government can salve via regulation 
3.) that the proposed solution solves the "problem" 
4.) that the proposed solution won't just cement the thing that you think is a "problem"
5.) that the proposed solution isn't just a vehicle for actual government censorship

So, unless you have some answers, you might want to do more research (hint: democratunderground.com is NOT a non-partisan research site)

[dr.chimps]

You have yet to prove:

1.) there is a problem
2.) there is a problem that the government can salve via regulation 
3.) that the proposed solution solves the "problem" 
4.) that the proposed solution won't just cement the thing that you think is a "problem"
5.) that the proposed solution isn't just a vehicle for actual government censorship

So, unless you have some answers, you might want to do more research (hint: democratunderground.com is NOT a non-partisan research site)

Idiot. It's like going into a casino and betting on the house.   

[_aj_]

Idiot. It's like going into a casino and betting on the house.  

Are you going to add to the debate or continue your silly simian commentary? At least TA provides content and some opinionated analysis.

[dr.chimps]

Are you going to add to the debate or continue your silly simian commentary? At least TA provides content and some opinionated analysis.

1/10   Try harder

[oldtimer1]

What fucking planet are you living on?  The Republicans voted in 2011 to END Net Neutrality.  

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/business/media/09broadband.html

House Votes Against ‘Net Neutrality’

You're ignorant. The NY Times has always been a backer of the Democratic party leading the sheep. If you would read the article you put up you would see the Republicans are against the FCC head who was a lobbyist for the industry regulating net neutrality. Like I said in my original statement. Everyone claims to be for net neutrality but it has to be their version which is a contradiction of net neutrality.

Letting the FCC head regulate net neutrality puts the Democratic run government in the position of overseeing what content a consumer could see and which companies would benefit from Internet access. It would give them the ability to regulate political content. There is nothing more than the Democrats would love.

That's what planet I'm from you Obama loving sheep.

The Republican led house didn't vote against net neutrality as the title of that propaganda NY Times article suggests. They voted against the head of the FCC who is a lobbyist again for the industry using his version for the betterment of those connected to the Democratic party.  

[timfogarty]

need to listen to an expert here:

    http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality

[timfogarty]

another set of experts weigh in on Net Neutrality

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/9873757f97/porn-star-net-neutrality

[Archer77]

1/10   Try harder

I give it a 10 for accuracy

[POB]

The government getting involved what could possibly go wrong...

[The Ugly]

Uh, Netflix.
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/186576-verizon-caught-throttling-netflix-traffic-even-after-its-pays-for-more-bandwidth

I also lived in the test area where they tried to implement tiered internet-luckily Chuck Schumer and some other Democrats halted it IMMEDIATELY.  They were in place to do it, so yes, it can and will happen if left up to moron Republicans.

Dude, you have more in common with Rs than you think.

What does Obama think about Muslims? About blacks, and Affirmative Action? 2nd Amendment? Israel? Welfare handouts?

And you, where do you stand?

[The True Adonis]

Dude, you have more in common with Rs than you think.

What does Obama think about Muslims? About blacks, and Affirmative Action? 2nd Amendment? Israel? Welfare handouts?

And you, where do you stand?

My judgements are all based on fact and evidence.  I care not for politics or any political ideology.

[The Ugly]

My judgements are all based on fact and evidence.  I care not for politics or any political ideology.

You had Obama saddles on your greyhounds - cut the shit, guy.

[The True Adonis]

You had Obama saddles on your greyhounds - cut the shit, guy.

So?  I was originally for and working for Mike Gravel before he quit the Libertarian nomination.  Candidate Obama was totally different than Actual Obama.  I knew that this would be the case and some is not of his own fault (bad congress), I didn`t support him because he was a Democrat, I supported him because I agreed with several of his positions and the alternative was a disaster because of Palin.  

[The Ugly]

So?  I was originally for and working for Mike Gravel before he quit the Libertarian nomination.  Candidate Obama was totally different than Actual Obama.  I knew that this would be the case and some is not of his own fault (bad congress), I didn`t support him because he was a Democrat, I supported him because I agreed with several of his positions and the alternative was a disaster because of Palin.  

With you on Palin, but you didn't vote for Biden, so be fair.

So, if you're a candidate guy, how do you register? D, Libertarian, or I?

[The True Adonis]

With you on Palin, but you didn't vote for Biden, so be fair.

So, if you're a candidate guy, how do you register? D, Libertarian, or I?

I liked Biden actually and still do.

[The Ugly]

I liked Biden actually and still do.

Transplants aside, you didn't answer the question. I know you hate Republicans, yet you share so many of their values. Btw, you know Obama is a proclaimed believer, right? So, why don't you dismiss (and/or despise) him like all the other non-activist atheists?

[The True Adonis]

Transplants aside, you didn't answer the question. I know you hate Republicans, yet you share so many of their values. Btw, you know Obama is a proclaimed believer, right? So, why don't you dismiss (and/or despise) him like all the other non-activist atheists?

Obama`s mother, father and grand parents were atheists.  He was known as an atheist in college and onwards.  Nobody believes he is religious at all except the morons.  He clearly lies as most have.  Even Dawkins is suspect.

[The True Adonis]

Transplants aside, you didn't answer the question. I know you hate Republicans, yet you share so many of their values. Btw, you know Obama is a proclaimed believer, right? So, why don't you dismiss (and/or despise) him like all the other non-activist atheists?

https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+atheist&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb

[The True Adonis]

Transplants aside, you didn't answer the question. I know you hate Republicans, yet you share so many of their values. Btw, you know Obama is a proclaimed believer, right? So, why don't you dismiss (and/or despise) him like all the other non-activist atheists?

Realizing Muslims are worthless and batshit crazy moreso than any other religion is not Republican or Democrat or anything.  Its called living in reality.

[The Ugly]

Realizing Muslims are worthless and batshit crazy moreso than any other religion is not Republican or Democrat or anything.  Its called living in reality.

It shouldn't be D or R, but it is, and Obama's “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” or “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer” clearly indicates he resides elsewhere.

You're just being dishonest by suggesting both ideologies view Muslims equally. Shit, that's exactly why Maher and Harris, who ARE realistic on the issue, got so much backlash. Affleck represents the majority of Democrats, and you know it.

[The True Adonis]

It shouldn't be D or R, but it is, and Obama's “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” or “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer” clearly indicates he resides elsewhere.

You're just being dishonest by suggesting both ideologies view Muslims equally. Shit, that's exactly why Maher and Harris, who ARE realistic on the issue, got so much backlash. Affleck represents the majority of Democrats, and you know it.

I have always said that a lot of liberals are morons on this issue.  I said there should not be anything political about it.  Facts are facts.