To say that black crime is not a white problem is shirking responsibility in a roundabout way....black crime and crime committed by all races is a serious problem for everyone in society......thats like saying slavery was a black problem 
...whites control or dominate all institutions in society I agree and acknowledge that blacks commit a large percentage of crimes and a large percentage of crimes against whites but its not becuase they are black and they want to prey on white victims....its economic...a less affluent population going after a more affluent population....are less affluent populations prone to more violence?....yes of course...
Whites seem to think that police and the criminal justice system are infallible......look at all the black guys released from prison in the past 20 years due to DNA testing and the innocense project who were set up by police and/or prosecutors.....(some whites were released as well)....so we have to stop constantly giving the police the benefit of the doubt and stop pretending that they don't lie when they're in hot shit just like everyone else does....
and if you look at the stats you will see that blacks get arrested for minor crimes like Trespassing for example much much more frequently than whites....there is a culture in the various police depts across America that locking up blacks is fine and no one questions it
Crime in the black community is a black problem. There is nothing I can do to keep fathers in the home or get parents to be more involved in their children's education. I can't change minds or be a role model for them because in their eyes I can never be. Blacks don't think I have anything to offer their community other than money.
You can't dismiss the crime against whites by blacks as simply a product of poverty. You have to prove that. You accused me of not owing up to and skirting my responsibilities but you are doing the very same thing by so easily dismissing these crimes as a product of poverty. The discrepancy is so large it demonstrates a clear pattern. When blacks target whites I doubt they ran their credit score before hand.
Blacks are attacking whites based on the assumption they have money because they are white. That would be profiling. However, the problem with your theory is that rates of black on white crime are pretty consistent across economic lines. What this means is that poor blacks are attack poor whites.
Whites don't think the police are infallible. In regards to black arrests, you're making a key mistake in your analysis. You're attempting to compare crime for crime without knowing the context. For example, a black guy is arrested for trespassing who has priors arrests. He also has pot in his pocket. Then you have a white guy arrested for trespassing who has no priors and is not in possession of pot. You can't compare the two because the circumstances are different but that's not what's happening. When you see these comparisons being made you are never presented with the criminal histories of the two people being compared.
Again, prove to me that black men are being murder by racist white cops for being black. Even if white cops killed a black male that does not imply racism. As you dismissed black on white crime I can also dismiss white cops shooting black suspects with nearly the same argument. In your scenario blacks aren't targeting whites but simply attacking the more affluent. I could argue that white cops aren't shooting blacks intentionally but shooting criminals who the data indicates are likely to be black based on the area being patrolled.
