This is what you call the hard video evidence? You need to have your head examined, you poor idiot, and I can tell you why: with that resolution you or no one else can say nothing about things which they see in that video. It is plain stupidity even claim so, because you can't even see if it is original Zapruder, or clip from some crappy movie. From original Zapruder film you can't find what they claim to be there, so please tell why? And while you are on it, just explain why they have been able to prove that all the shots were shot from behind, by real evidence. I mean they have been even able to copy those shots not just by computer modeling, but with real shots with similar rifle and bullets. As I pointed out, Bugliosi has made a case study about this, so as a lawyer, what was his motive? He has spend 20 years to write a book about the case, and in that book he plain and simple shot down every one of these conspiracy theories. How? Because in 20 years he hasn't been able to find even one single evidence which would point that there was another shooter. There is only these stupid fucking claims that in those videos with complete crappy resolution happens something which isn't there. But anyway, just for fun, let see how your evidence holds when we look it closer.
So, the driver shot the JFK? Why? Why Zapruder film doesn't show it? Is the Zapruder film fake? It has to be the most investigated piece of filmed material in this world, so how they have make the fake one with tools of that era? They visited in the future and used photoshop? How, meaning what kind of means they used? Because so many have study that film and claim it is authentic? And how he shot? Right handed guy pulls a gun and throw a shot with his left hand, hitting the JFK but not at the senator who sits in between of them? No one doesn't even react to this shot, they just sit still, while act like that would provoke a reaction from anyone. Even the senator, who is facing the muzzle flash of the gun, doesn't react in any way? In real life he would be deaf and blind, but who cares about reality? Why all this tends to smell like bullshit? Do you even need any brains to solve that mystery 
Let's repeat the facts, which has been proved by real and concrete evidence:
1. There is a truckload of evidence which clearly points out that Oswald was lonely shooter
2. There isn't even a shred of evidence that there were any other party involved at the shooting
3. There isn't any counterevidence what so ever, only rumors, claims and speculation.
There you have it in the nutshell, so hopefully you learn something. But why stop here? Let me ask this simple question: To make conspiracies like JFK assassination etc. to happen, you need a bunch of people to make it happen. Do we agree about this? Conspiracy is always a plot which has been cooked up by several people, otherwise it would be some single nutjob doing his thing. There is one common thing about these theories, because there is never any leaks, nothing what so ever. There is saying: Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. So why in the name of hell there hasn't be any kind of leaks about these conspiracies, while every fucking secret which USA government has ever have is in the wikileaks etc. Well, now you think that there is an answer in that saying, you can't leak if you are dead. Simple as that. But what it really means? It means that by every conspiracy, you have to kill every one involved, but the few key players. That mean hundreds of dead's for every fucking conspiracy, so where they find all these people for these suicide missions? They need to be brilliantly smart people because they doesn't leave any evidence behind, but still willing to die for some fucking false flag operation? Have you really think this over?
The material witnesses have all met their untimely death, 40 of them I believe in total.
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/deaths.htmlThe footage is not fake them merely removed certain frames and sped up the actual real time of what happened.
Kennedys brain was also removed prior to the autopsy and another brain was used.
His brain would have revealed the shot from the front was the lethal shot from close proximity.
Kennedy was theatening with a full disclosure of everything that was going on including CIA drug dealing for the elite, the cabal of secret societies, the UFO agenda and Disbanment of the shadow government (table of 12 or majority 12)
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/1960-1969.phpSelected Transcript of John F. Kennedy's Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961:
“The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.
And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security... And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
All of this is available freely from FOI now.
Make your own informed decision.
