DNA Discoverer: Blacks Less Intelligent Than Whites

[thegamechanger]

haha intelligence, oh brother.

thats something weak and ugly people discuss in order to make them selves feel better because they cant perform in the gym and in the bedroom.

watch any video where the nerd gets beaten by the jocks who you rather be?

[muscleman-2013]

haha intelligence, oh brother.

thats something weak and ugly people discuss in order to make them selves feel better because they cant perform in the gym and in the bedroom.

watch any video where the nerd gets beaten by the jocks who you rather be?

Ha ha I can tell this pamphlet shaped your life.

[obsidian]

Everyone who is not of Ashkanazi Jewish descent if going to have to find a way to deal with the fact that they are born,  genetically, with less intelligence.  There are also drawbacks to this as well because our Ashkanazi heritage does include some unique genetic diseases such as Marfan and sometimes colon cancer.  However, there is also evidence that the telomeres in our DNA are longer which could mean a longer overall max lifespan as long as conditions are met to combat these certain genetic diseases specific to Ashkanazi.


In other words, ethnicity has a lot to do with genetics and to say otherwise is wrong.

Maybe the pseudo jews should have been smarter and countered inbreeding more? Pseudo jews preach DIEversity / Miscegenation for all Caucasians and at the same time don't follow their own advices? And now they have weakened their gene pool. Yes, there are some pseudo jews like Ron Perlman that do practice Miscegenation but the majority don't. What's Israel up to these days with their immigration program?

Asperger syndrome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome

Gaucher's disease
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaucher%27s_disease

More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jews

[obsidian]

Russian-speakers who want to make aliya could need DNA test

Read more: Russian-speakers who want to make aliya could need DNA test | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-speakers-who-want-to-immigrate-could-need-dna-test/#ixzz3MYC5aV4I
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

Netanyahu may require DNA tests to prove immigrants have a Jewish ‘bloodline’ - See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/netanyahu-may-require-dna-tests-to-prove-immigrants-have-a-jewish-bloodline#sthash.Afr91cdO.dpuf

[muscleman-2013]

Russian-speakers who want to make aliya could need DNA test

Read more: Russian-speakers who want to make aliya could need DNA test | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/russian-speakers-who-want-to-immigrate-could-need-dna-test/#ixzz3MYC5aV4I
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

Netanyahu may require DNA tests to prove immigrants have a Jewish ‘bloodline’ - See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/netanyahu-may-require-dna-tests-to-prove-immigrants-have-a-jewish-bloodline#sthash.Afr91cdO.dpuf

Well naturally, we have to keep the bloodline a pure as possible.

[obsidian]

Well naturally, we have to keep the bloodline a pure as possible.

Yes, so we can produce more Hitlers. I'm part "jew" myself. Yet I recognize the danger we pose.

New DNA Evidence Shows Hitler Was Jewish
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/new-dna-evidence-shows-hitler-was-jewish/

[obsidian]

We are all part jewish  

Askenazi jews are converts to Judaism. If we go back 1500 years the ancestors of Ashkenazis weren't "Jewish".

And we are all related if you go back a few thousand years in Europe. So we could all decide to convert to Judaism today, just like the Ashkenazi ancestors did.

[Viking11]

We are all part jewish 

Askenazi jews are converts to Judaism. So if we go back 1500 years the ancestors of Ashkenazis weren't "Jewish".

And we are all related if you go back a few thousand years in Europe. So we could all decide we will convert to Judaism today, just like the Ashkenazi ancestors did.

No we aren't. I have 0% Jewish DNA. By two separate tests.

[obsidian]

No we aren't. I have 0% Jewish DNA. By two separate tests.

You have 50% Banana DNA - are you going to tell me you have 0% Banana DNA?

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/evolution/what-is-the-evidence/morphology/dna-molecules/

The genes of organisms that look very different are surprisingly similar. For example, human DNA sequences are over 95% identical to chimpanzee sequences and around 50% identical to banana sequences.

You have to go back in time a long way to find a common ancestor between humans and bananas, but ultimately they have both emerged from the same family tree, the tree of life, and that is why they share common characteristics.

[MAXX]

You have 50% Banana DNA - are you going to tell me you have 0% Banana DNA?

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/evolution/what-is-the-evidence/morphology/dna-molecules/

The genes of organisms that look very different are surprisingly similar. For example, human DNA sequences are over 95% identical to chimpanzee sequences and around 50% identical to banana sequences.

You have to go back in time a long way to find a common ancestor between humans and bananas, but ultimately they have both emerged from the same family tree, the tree of life, and that is why they share common characteristics.

if you're going that far back you may aswell say we're all n|ggers since we all originate from Africa  

typical jew conning and deception tactics

[The True Adonis]

You couldn't even mention this until recently, when Michael Johnson made a documentary specifically addressing that it was in fact genetics that made blacks superior in sprinting.not only that but being black and descendant of slave ancestors was like winning the lottery in sprinting.Documentary is called survival of the fastest if non uk viewers cant watch this YouTube link.

He is dead wrong as well.  There never was or could have been a "breeding program" for many, many reasons, too numerous to list really.  For one, economically, it would not make sense for starters.   
 Most slave owners did not own Tons of slaves.  The majority just 1-5 (hardly a big gene pool to select from, which they didn`t bother to do anyway).  On the bigger plantations you had hundreds (still not a big enough gene pool to select from and they didn`t select anyways), and then the Plantation Owners did not force breed at all.  Instead, slaves were permitted to carry on as a normal family would and Plantation Owners always tried to keep families together.  Slaves were permitted to marry whoever they wanted and owners recognized these marriages.  There is a lot more to this aspect that would take forever to delve into.

Not only that, but the Phenotype does NOT determine a Genotype.  Just because James was good with a pitch fork and plow does not automatically mean his son James Jr. would be equally adept.  Also, there simply would be no way to identify positive alleles in such a short amount of time.  There would be nothing to look for nor any scientific way of doing so.

Hope this helps and like I said, do a search.  I have went into great detail on this elsewhere.  The smaller and more skilled would be better.  Less calories to feed them and they could actually do something.

The main thing any plantation owner looked for was work ethic and skill sets and work history (things you couldn`t breed for anyways).  As amusing as that sounds, its true. If Junius was known to be a good cook and his wife Mary a domestic capable of keeping the plantation`s owners children in line, then they were incredibly important and more valuable to keep together which always happened.  Same thing with field workers.  You can`t get much work out of someone separated from their family and unhappy.  Much better to keep families together.  Plus, most owners cared what happened to their slaves and their own children grew up side by side with them.

[Conker]

so because one 'scientist' says something that fits a chosen agenda it becomes the general consensus?

well here's something that's hard to explain if this theory is correct.

"African immigrants have the highest educational attainment rates of all American ethnic groups, with higher levels of completion than the commonly stereotyped Asian American model minority.[37][38] Like most Asian Americans, black Africans migrated to America in the last few decades after the Jim crow/African American Civil Rights Movement era ended. Prior to the mid-1970s."

[obsidian]

if you're going that far back you may aswell say we're all n|ggers since we all originate from Africa  

typical jew conning and deception tactics

[_aj_]

so because one 'scientist' says something that fits a chosen agenda it becomes the general consensus?

well here's something that's hard to explain if this theory is correct.

"African immigrants have the highest educational attainment rates of all American ethnic groups, with higher levels of completion than the commonly stereotyped Asian American model minority.[37][38] Like most Asian Americans, black Africans migrated to America in the last few decades after the Jim crow/African American Civil Rights Movement era ended. Prior to the mid-1970s."

You're gonna have to provide a citation for that little gem as it runs contrary to literally the rest of the scientific evidence and my (and your) eyes.

[obsidian]

He is dead wrong as well.  There never was or could have been a "breeding program" for many, many reasons, too numerous to list really.  For one, economically, it would not make sense for starters.   
 Most slave owners did not own Tons of slaves.  The majority just 1-5 (hardly a big gene pool to select from, which they didn`t bother to do anyway).  On the bigger plantations you had hundreds (still not a big enough gene pool to select from and they didn`t select anyways), and then the Plantation Owners did not force breed at all.  Instead, slaves were permitted to carry on as a normal family would and Plantation Owners always tried to keep families together.  Slaves were permitted to marry whoever they wanted and owners recognized these marriages.  There is a lot more to this aspect that would take forever to delve into.

Not only that, but the Phenotype does NOT determine a Genotype.  Just because James was good with a pitch fork and plow does not automatically mean his son James Jr. would be equally adept.  Also, there simply would be no way to identify positive alleles in such a short amount of time.  There would be nothing to look for nor any scientific way of doing so.

Hope this helps and like I said, do a search.  I have went into great detail on this elsewhere.  The smaller and more skilled would be better.  Less calories to feed them and they could actually do something.

The main thing any plantation owner looked for was work ethic and skill sets and work history (things you couldn`t breed for anyways).  As amusing as that sounds, its true. If Junius was known to be a good cook and his wife Mary a domestic capable of keeping the plantation`s owners children in line, then they were incredibly important and more valuable to keep together which always happened.  Same thing with field workers.  You can`t get much work out of someone separated from their family and unhappy.  Much better to keep families together.  Plus, most owners cared what happened to their slaves and their own children grew up side by side with them.

Blacks were indirectly bred via survival of the fittest. Only the strongest survived the boat trip and subsequent abuse / labor. What did you think he meant they literally had breeding programs? Are you dumb / stupid / moronic?

[The True Adonis]

Blacks were indirectly bred via survival of the fittest. Only the strongest survived the boat trip and subsequent abuse / labor. What did you think he meant they literally had breeding programs? Are you dumb / stupid / moronic?

Moron.  The ability to survive a boat trip has nothing to do with strength or a hardy constitutions.  It just means they were able to survive a boat trip.  You are dumb as a brick.

[The True Adonis]

Blacks were indirectly bred via survival of the fittest. Only the strongest survived the boat trip and subsequent abuse / labor. What did you think he meant they literally had breeding programs? Are you dumb / stupid / moronic?

ROFLMAO, "indirectly bred".   By that juvenile rationale, everything and everyone is "indirectly bred" for survival.  Otherwise you would have (should have) died in the womb or shortly after childbirth (what a shame you missed out).

[thegamechanger]

Naturalist Intelligence, Musical Intelligence, Logical-Mathematical Intelligence, Existential Intelligence, Interpersonal Intelligence, Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence, Linguistic Intelligence, Intra-personal Intelligence, Spatial Intelligence.

[Conker]

You're gonna have to provide a citation for that little gem as it runs contrary to literally the rest of the scientific evidence and my (and your) eyes.

just google african immigrants education, i'm sure you will find plenty of sources to back it up.

"contrary to the rest of the scientific evidence"... two words...BULL.... i think you know the other one

[Natural Man]

as a whole black people care less and seem more happy tho.

[thegamechanger]

as a whole black people care less and seem more happy tho.

suggesting that they are less intelligent.

[tom joad]

suggesting that they are less intelligent.

is the goal of life to be more happy or more intelligent? (I mean, ideally it's both, but if you had to choose.)

[Irongrip400]

You have 50% Banana DNA - are you going to tell me you have 0% Banana DNA?

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/evolution/what-is-the-evidence/morphology/dna-molecules/

The genes of organisms that look very different are surprisingly similar. For example, human DNA sequences are over 95% identical to chimpanzee sequences and around 50% identical to banana sequences.

You have to go back in time a long way to find a common ancestor between humans and bananas, but ultimately they have both emerged from the same family tree, the tree of life, and that is why they share common characteristics.

I'm more of a large banana, the rest of you chumps are part plantain.

[Natural Man]

suggesting that they are less intelligent.

They indeed are, but will probably survive longer while the depressed white man slowly but surely disapear. Mankind is in its final days. There will be a new dark age with blacks muslims and chinese fighting over the ruins the exhausted white man who doesnt breed anymore leaves behind him.

[TheGrinch]

No whites or asians in this race - why? Is it genetics or culture?

bingo....100%


but try and get anyone to admit it.... good luck with that

we have to all sit around, hold hands and sing that we are the same.....

NONSENSE... nature is NEVER the same

every type of animal has different God given traits yet different humans cant have different traits?


WTF??