Author Topic: Mike O`Hearn in 1986  (Read 9036 times)

Neymar Barca

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« on: February 26, 2015, 09:54:58 AM »
.............


Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2015, 09:59:38 AM »
Man what years of hard work and natural genetics can do. Amazing

MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2015, 10:01:56 AM »
Been working on his lying skills for more than thirty years. No wonder he feels natural about it.

Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2015, 10:02:24 AM »
Been working on his lying skills for more than thirty years. No wonder he feels natural about it.

Everything comes "natural" to mike

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2015, 10:06:50 AM »
Has it ever crossed your mind that there might be people with better genetics than yours on planet earth?

Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2015, 10:11:17 AM »
Has it ever crossed your mind that there might be people with better genetics than yours on planet earth?

Of course there are. Do I think that there are genetics that allow people to walk around at 250 plus pounds at 5% body fat year round? no. Let's use common sense. Why is it that nothing has changed over the past 50 years except the drugs and the availability of them but now all of no where we have people that are bigger and in better condition than guys at the olympia in the 70 and early 80 but they're natural? I mean really?

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2015, 10:13:38 AM »
Of course there are. Do I think that there are genetics that allow people to walk around at 250 plus pounds at 5% body fat year round no. Let's use common sense. Why is it that nothing has changed over the past 50 years except the drugs and the availability of them but now all of no where we have people that are bigger and in better condition thrn guys at the olyimpa in the 70 and early 80 but they're natural? I mean really

How come cars drive faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Why are computers faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Drugs?

Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2015, 10:16:09 AM »
How come cars drive faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Why are computers faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Drugs?

Increase in technology.  Weights havnt changed they still are weights, food isn't changed.. But there have been leaps in the drug game since the 70's

Are you telling me people's genetics have gotten better in 30 years?

Lifting styles and dieting has advanced.  Has it advanced so much that now a natty guy can be bigger and leaner then Arnold who had amazing genetics and took drugs?


Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2015, 10:18:04 AM »
All sweet potato and squirrel egg.   And exactly 10 almonds a day.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2015, 10:21:13 AM »
Increase in technology.  Weights havnt changed they still are weights, food isn't changed.. But there have been leaps in the drug game since the 70's

Are you telling me people's genetics have gotten better in 30 years?

Lifting styles and dieting has advanced.  Has it advanced so much that now a natty guy can be bigger and leaner then Arnold who had amazing genetics and took drugs?

Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.

Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2015, 10:22:51 AM »
Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.

So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

What is he 6' 3" 245ish in crazy condition

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2015, 10:27:25 AM »
So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

Idk and I don't give a f*ck, I know neither of em. I'm just not that insecure to claim that I'm the ultimate peak of human genetic evolution and everyone who looks better than me has to be a juicer, Period. I accept the fact that there might be guys out there who got better genetics than me regarding the single, quite unimportant factor of building muscle, maybe I got em on other facotrs. :)

Competitor 9

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2015, 10:29:08 AM »
Idk and I don't give a f*ck, I know neither of em. I'm just not that insecure to claim that I'm the ultimate peak of human genetic evolution and everyone who looks better than me has to be a juicer, Period. I accept the fact that there might be guys out there who got better genetics than me regarding the single, quite unimportant factor of building muscle, maybe I got em on other facotrs. :)

Haha I'm not saying he dosnt have great genetics. He does no question!

Waller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3762
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2015, 10:33:49 AM »
That's affeman outed then?

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15966
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #14 on: February 26, 2015, 11:09:07 AM »
Looks like he's been wearing toupees since his teens.

#teamwigs4life


ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #15 on: February 26, 2015, 01:23:59 PM »
so what then? If he uses, he's been on for all these years? Hmm, not sure about this. He is naturally strong, that translates into great gains if you train properly and he does.

Not sayin' he's lifetime natural but probably not the abuser guys here make him out to be. His body would be much more aged by now had he abused like a maniac over decades.

?

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2015, 01:34:28 PM »
So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

What is he 6' 3" 245ish in crazy condition

Arnolds chest and arms way bigger than Ohearns

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2015, 01:48:20 PM »
Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.

Please share some knowledge, it would be nice to add 10 pound pure muscle and got under 10% bodyfat...im just curious if I have missed something in my 22 years of natural lifting career...

Equipment...thats interesting!!!

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2015, 01:52:59 PM »
Arnolds chest and arms way bigger than Ohearns

U dont know if ohearn max his body or just cruising around on low doses! U cant compare these to men! Arnold probably maxed everything and was willing to do anything to win the contest!


ramana

  • Guest
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2015, 01:54:18 PM »
Man what years of hard work and natural genetics can do. Amazing
i guess so because you have been juicing your ballz off and stuffing yourself like a pig for years and still look like fucking shit

kepler2008

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2015, 02:18:07 PM »
Mother Nature don't allow to transform a body like that :

from this :




to this :





thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #21 on: February 26, 2015, 03:16:08 PM »
U dont know if ohearn max his body or just cruising around on low doses! U cant compare these to men! Arnold probably maxed everything and was willing to do anything to win the contest!



the fuck are you on about now??

jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4142
  • No homo of peace
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #22 on: February 26, 2015, 03:32:13 PM »
If you are that big and strong at 17, steroids or no steroids you have good genetics.

da_vinci

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5289
  • Cry me a river
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #23 on: February 26, 2015, 04:11:55 PM »
so what then? If he uses, he's been on for all these years? Hmm, not sure about this. He is naturally strong, that translates into great gains if you train properly and he does.

Not sayin' he's lifetime natural but probably not the abuser guys here make him out to be. His body would be much more aged by now had he abused like a maniac over decades.



I think he's a very smart abuser. He's stong as fuck in every exercise and he's nearing 50, there are very very few people who can achieve that. That dude may be gay or whatever, but he's certainly no dummie when it comes to his craft. Genetics of gods are there too, obviously.

da_vinci

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5289
  • Cry me a river
Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
« Reply #24 on: February 26, 2015, 04:15:03 PM »
Mother Nature don't allow to transform a body like that :

from this :





Holly hell, what a moonface he has in this vid, lmfao. The face transformation alone is crazy.