My kid last night hitting 480lbs

[SF1900]

[Coach is Back!]

when the lift ratios are all out and the numbers seem ridiculous I'm going to go ahead and assume most of these squats are 6 inch ''power bobs''

im sure videos will be along eventually


 

even when I was squatting 605 raw I wouldn't have been able to do 315 for 31 ass to ground reps, and I was deadlifting a shit ton more than 600 at that strength & benching 455 with a busted shoulder

I'll go first and post a video of how much I was box squatting to be a 605 raw parallel squatter

the tren back in high school must have been good stuff

How tall are you and how much do you weigh?

[Mawse]

5'11" and 220ish, why?

[Coach is Back!]

5'11" and 220ish, why?

Just wondering. You looked bigger in the video.

[flinstones1]

 had a buddy who was 185 in high school who now runs the 40 in 4.3. IF he were 6'0-6'1 instead of 5'10 he'd be in the nfl. Saw him box squat 450 on a pretty low box....but the kid couldn't even bench 315  pounds. So was he strong per say

 Some guys just have very high amounts of starting strength and are very explosive and can translate to certain lifts.  Good old fashioned bench press is the true test of strength IMO. If a 18 year old  kid can bench 300 he's  fairly strong for his age.  400   he's probably in the top 5% in strength  of college athletes. There are usually only a couple   guys on any D! team benching 400, most of the time you  can count them on one hand.  Yes even at the D! level

[Coach is Back!]

had a buddy who was 185 in high school who now runs the 40 in 4.3. IF he were 6'0-6'1 instead of 5'10 he'd be in the nfl. Saw him box squat 450 on a pretty low box....but the kid couldn't even bench 315  pounds. So was he strong per say

 Some guys just have very high amounts of starting strength and are very explosive and can translate to certain lifts.  Good old fashioned bench press is the true test of strength IMO. If a 18 year old  kid can bench 300 he's  fairly strong for his age.  400   he's probably in the top 5% in strength  of college athletes. There are usually only a couple   guys on any D! team benching 400, most of the time you  can count them on one hand.  Yes even at the D! level

If you're buddy is running a 4.3 and in college he'd instantly get an invite to the combine and even if he wasn't someone would pick him up. That would make him one of the fastest at any pro day or nfl combine. Is this hand or laser timed?

[flinstones1]

If you're buddy is running a 4.3 and in college he'd instantly get an invite to the combine and even if he wasn't someone would pick him up. That would make him one of the fastest at any pro day or nfl combine. Is this hand or laser timed?

4.38 laser timed, he's completely natural too.  IDK why more guys aren't interested in him, lack of size is the only thing that comes to mind. He's about 5'10 180 ish

[Coach is Back!]

4.38 laser timed, he's completely natural too.  IDK why more guys aren't interested in him, lack of size is the only thing that comes to mind. He's about 5'10 180 ish

That Kind of speed, unless he has no hands, would be a legit WR or CB at the D1 level. They couldn't careless if what or how many times he can bench 225.

[Papper]

That's great. Make sure you don't get him to hurt himself though, that wouldn't be so good.

[MAXX]

for anyone who missed it here's a caption from the video

[thebrink]

feel the same way about sumo pullers, that's not a deadlift

Agreed. There's no way it can be a harder lift (as devilesmile once claimed)

[Ronnie Rep]

Nice Coach, teaching the kid well.

[Coach is Back!]

for anyone who missed it here's a caption from the video

Don't hate. BTW, does Chris McCombs know you stole from his site?

[38-26-40]

What a stud

[Straw Man]

I'll have it moved to the training board.....

Nooooooo...it'll get buried. Wait, we have a training board? lol

yeah that would defeat the purpose which was for Joe to prop up his fragile ego by living vicariously through his kid, even it  if means exposing he and his kid to ridicule

[Van_Bilderass]

Agreed. There's no way it can be a harder lift (as devilesmile once claimed)

It can be harder, depending on structure and if you have done the lift a lot.
But it's way less lower back, a lot like a squat for many as they are so upright the whole time.
The biggest pulls are all conventional like Mawse said but in the lower weight classes the sumo is more popular, especially in the IPF.

[Coach is Back!]

yeah that would defeat the purpose which was for Joe to prop up his fragile ego by living vicariously through his kid, even it  if means exposing he and his kid to ridicule

You sound like a whiny liberal bitch. Oh wait. Never mind.

[Neptune100]

That Kind of speed, unless he has no hands, would be a legit WR or CB at the D1 level. They couldn't careless if what or how many times he can bench 225.

Track Speed, or 40 yard dash speed, doesn't necessarily translate to NFL speed.  Too many examples to point out.

[Coach is Back!]

Track Speed, or 40 yard dash speed, doesn't necessarily translate to NFL speed.  Too many examples to point out.

Personally i think 40 times are waste except for RB's, DB's and WR's. All the rest I'm more concerned with a first step and 10, 20 splits. One of the most useless things I've seen in HS football is the coach sending players to the track coach as if starting from blocks is going to help. Football is damn near 90% COD.

[Henda]

Coach of one was just looking to build size and strength of the legs what squat variation would you choose?
Are box squats where the box is used to limit depth with no emphasis on the posterior chain any good for someone whose lower back cannot take much more of full range Olympic squats?

[Coach is Back!]

Coach of one was just looking to build size and strength of the legs what squat variation would you choose?
Are box squats where the box is used to limit depth with no emphasis on the posterior chain any good for someone whose lower back cannot take much more of full range Olympic squats?

1. I wouldn't use box squats for size. That would be standard back squat/front squats

2. Box squats have no emphasis on posterior chain?? It's purpose IS for posterior chain development. Unless you're trying to say other wise.

[Henda]

1. I wouldn't use box squats for size. That would be standard back squat/front squats

2. Box squats have no emphasis on posterior chain?? It's purpose IS for posterior chain development. Unless you're trying to say other wise.

1. I wouldn't use box squats for size. That would be standard back squat/front squats

2. Box squats have no emphasis on posterior chain?? It's purpose IS for posterior chain development. Unless you're trying to say other wise.

I Wasn't trying to suggest otherwise, I meant by just having the box there and squatting down to it without trying to sit back and activate the posterior chain, and try and keep the emphasis on the quads.

[Straw Man]

1. I wouldn't use box squats for size. That would be standard back squat/front squats

2. Box squats have no emphasis on posterior chain?? It's purpose IS for posterior chain development. Unless you're trying to say other wise.

development of what...your ego?

is your kid training for a powerlifting competition?

what is the point of doing a 1 rep max on anything?

btw - why do you even bring up "liberal"

what does your ego boost have to do with politics?

[Coach is Back!]

I Wasn't tjavascript:void(0);rying to suggest otherwise, I meant by just having the box there and squatting down to it without trying to sit back and activate the posterior chain, and try and keep the emphasis on the quads.

Oh I see. I just use touch and go to help people gauge depth when we teach a traditional squat.  

[Coach is Back!]

development of what...your ego?

is your kid training for a powerlifting competition?

what is the point of doing a 1 rep max on anything?

btw - why do you even bring up "liberal"

what does your ego boost have to do with politics?

WTF are you even talking about...dolt. Where do you anything about politics in the above post?