For the most part I agree with you. However, we are still held accountable for our decisions otherwise every time a cop gets into a fight he can just shoot the person and we can chalk it up to tunnel vision and fight or flight. Now I've never been tased by a suspect, don't know if Slagel was or not. But I have been in some down and dirty fights were bad guy was trying to take my duty weapon. I can pretty well put myself in Slagels shoes based on my experience. If fighting a suspect puts him in such a state that he will calmly draw his weapon and fire off 8 shots down range.. the guy has more than just manslaughter charges to worry about.
I'l also say again, that IF his report reflects pretty much what happened..taking the adrenaline and tunnel vision into account, I can see him not getting the maximum possible sentence. By all appearances he seemed like a cop trying to handle a traffic stop that turned into a foot pursuit and then a physical altercation. He made a really bad decision in the end which ended a life and no doubt screwed up his. But decades in prison for it wouldn't be justice.
But if it becomes apparent he tried to cover it up or lie about what happened... all bets are off
I think he is fucked
I think he executed the guy
but I think he wasn't thinking rationally at the time
should be a mitigating factor
maybe manslaughter instead of murder
or what ever the equivalent is in the usa
give people guns civilian or cop
and people get killed
if he only had non lethal options the outcome is the guy lives
and he gets to go on with his life
guns are too effective humans don't have the ability to use them wisely
we never have and never will
I get that it is enshrined within your constitution
but people are going to keep dying
its as simple as that