I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt but I'm starting to believe this is all a troll job with 240's support of Cruz.
He has been increasingly critical of his politics here lately.
I believe I'm MORE credible in my support of Cruz when I'm willing to point out all his flaws - but still explain why he's the only chance for a GOP win in 2016 (as I did above with the women vote stat).
I don't trust the cat who can't admit obama is in bed with bill ayers, or can't admit Bush presidency was pushed by war machine. I don't trust the cat who can't admit Reagan was an amnesty lib big spender, or that Clinton was a disgrace, a wet spot on the decade.
I admit I don't like this hypocrisy by Cruz, but still openly endorse him for the presidency. And I'd like to see him run against Sanders, if that was possible, so that the extreme viewpoints lead the election - no more dem/hawk vs RINOs.
So if 100% kneepadding, and complete denial of a candidate's weakness is what you want, then sorry, that's not me. If you want me to tell you why Cruz can/will fix America, and I'm the first to admit his weaknesses... to me, that's way more credible, and more likely to convince others to look at Cruz and say "wow, he really does have some great positions".