In absolute terms, the capitalization of Bitcoin will be capped in the future.
All added value will be made on Smart Contracts, NFTs and Defi.
Ethereum will gradually die and be overtaken by the only ultra-efficient and secure all-in-one blockchain.
In the medium term, Solana will exceed the market capitalization of Ethereum and then, thanks to the massive adoption by institutions of this added value, absent from Bitcoin which will remain the store of value par excellence, will exceed its market capitalization.
Solana is not as secure. You're making claims as if they are facts.
Let's look at the various consensus methods.
Bitcoin - Proof of Work
Ethereum - Proof of Stake
Solana - Proof of History
They each have advantages and disadvantages. There's room for more than one or three thriving blockchains. It is unrealistic to expect Solana L1 to do everything on one chain - without choking. The hardware requirements would be insane. There's already talk of Solana Layer 2s. Realize that the security of a chain first starts with the L1. The L2s derive their security from the L1. The argument is that Solana can do everything on L1 and that Ethereum's L1 + L2 design is flawed. That narrative is destroyed when Solana also jumps on the L2 bandwagon. Solana has a spam problem, failed transactions, shutdowns, high inflation, and expensive validator hardware. It seems to be fast but those numbers are exaggerated. It is a valid project though and has gained traction - I won't deny that.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchains-like-solana-brag-about-tps-but-it-s-misleadinghttps://coinfomania.com/solana-founder-says-theres-nothing-stopping-devs-from-building-l2s/All the major blockchains have pros and cons.
Pros and Cons of Proof of History (PoH)Solana’s Proof of History (PoH) technique has several advantages for the network. The main benefit is that it significantly improves the scalability of the blockchain as previous transactions can be efficiently verified while minimizing data storage requirements. It is also extremely energy efficient, reducing the carbon footprint of PoH-enabled blockchains.
The main disadvantage is that it relies on a trusted third party, the PoH generator, to generate the hashes that are included in the blockchain. This PoH generator plays an important role in the security and reliability of the network, and the network in general can be negatively affected if the PoH generator is unreliable.
Possible problems with Proof of History (PoH)Although proof-of-history can enable incredibly fast and efficient blockchain systems, it has its limitations.
By far the most important of these is centralisation. At the heart of the PoH system are PoH generators, which are used to generate a PoH sequence. Since there is only one PoH generator at a time, these represent a single point of failure and are viewed by some as an unacceptable level of centralisation.
Additionally, generating proof-of-history hashes is computationally intensive, making a node more complex and expensive to operate. According to the official Solana documentation, validation nodes must meet strict hardware requirements, with the following recommended spec being: 12 cores (24 threads) + CPU, 128GB RAM, and 500GB-1TB+ storage.
