That was then. This is now. Plus, the cultural differences between Japan and Iraq. And the ruling system. There is a reason why Al Queda and others of its ilk couldn't survive in an iron fist Saddam controlled Iraq. And Our infrastructure is falling apart...the nation is sinking from more things than debt.
There are two types of military analysts — those who believe that the essence of war is unchanging, and others who insist that its very nature is constantly and forever altered by rapidly transforming technologies, mentalities, and physical realities. The former are mostly historians. They see the nature of man as fixed, and so identify real change only in the pump — the delivery system — not the water or essence, of war. The latter are social scientists, technologists, and sometimes military men themselves, who believe new hydraulics pour forth an entirely novel liquid.
I am a believer of the former and have history to back me up. There is nothing new here but the delivery system. We must not forget the wisdom of the ages in the noise and clutter of the present. In general, Plato, Sun-Tzu, and Shakespeare, who know the unchanging nature of man, are more valuable guides in our present war than the New York Times or MSNBC. Our President and military leadership should be guided more by Thucydides than by Marx, Freud, or Foucault, and so believes that the more things change in war, the more the fundamentals remain the same.
So it doesn't really matter, nor should we care, if ISIS, Al Queda, Taliban or the Red Hand Commandos and their thugs are real Islamic fundamentalists, old-time Mahdists, or Christian nuts in drag. Nor does it ultimately matter much whether they plan to poison water, hijack airplanes, spread germs, or throw spitballs at us — only whether we have the military power and the WILL to kill them first, destroy their enclaves, strip away their money and refuges, and demonstrate to their followers that death and misery are the final and only wages of a terrorist's life.