« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?  (Read 21490 times)

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #75 on: July 09, 2015, 04:46:37 PM »
Quote from: MORTALCOIL on July 09, 2015, 03:40:16 AM
I don't get your post. If Haney comes right after Arnold and Coleman, you rank him ahead of Dorian then. So according to your logic, Phil would beat Dorian though he's not on the same level than Dillett or Levrone. Please explain.

I take into account their era. That's why I can place Arnold first but admit that he wouldn't even place today.
Logged

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #76 on: July 09, 2015, 04:53:58 PM »
Quote from: Royal Lion on July 09, 2015, 06:20:33 AM
No way Phil beats this.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iMftr3QnYXs

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdm3y1zgeJY

If you could stand the two together in real life during their prime you will see that Phil is thicker and more developed every where compared to Haney.
Logged

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28357
  • stuff for dumplings
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #77 on: July 09, 2015, 06:59:47 PM »
Quote from: pellius on July 09, 2015, 04:53:58 PM
If you could stand the two together in real life during their prime you will see that Phil is thicker and more developed every where compared to Haney.

He would be smaller without his all-you-can-eat insulin buffet which Lee did not have at his disposal.
Logged

Walter Sobchak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13677
  • HANKINS IS A FUCKING LIAR & QUITTER
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #78 on: July 09, 2015, 07:23:26 PM »
Quote from: pellius on July 09, 2015, 04:53:58 PM
If you could stand the two together in real life during their prime you will see that Phil is thicker and more developed every where compared to Haney.

So was Bertil Fox.

And Haney's width dwarfed Bertil.

Haney was 5'-11" and 255 lbs and as cut as a lightweight
Logged

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #79 on: July 09, 2015, 09:43:00 PM »
Quote from: pellius on July 09, 2015, 04:53:58 PM
If you could stand the two together in real life during their prime you will see that Phil is thicker and more developed every where compared to Haney.
I disagree. Haney's heighth and width would overwhelm Phil.  Phil has a thicker waist and obliques though.  ;D
Logged

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #80 on: July 09, 2015, 09:44:57 PM »
 :o
Logged

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #81 on: July 10, 2015, 01:06:16 AM »
Haney is everything perfect about bodybuilding in the above shots. Size, shape, symmetry, aesthetics - everything. Even the slimmer legs made his physique look more like a superhuman athlete. Greeks sculptors would've salivated chiseling this shit.

As stupid as it's all become, dude was godly back then. Only Arnold compares.
Logged

The_Iron_Disciple

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6493
  • Team New Dad
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #82 on: July 10, 2015, 01:40:06 AM »
Quote from: The Ugly on July 10, 2015, 01:06:16 AM
Haney is everything perfect about bodybuilding in the above shots. Size, shape, symmetry, aesthetics - everything. Even the slimmer legs made his physique look more like a superhuman athlete. Greeks sculptors would've salivated chiseling this shit.

As stupid as it's all become, dude was godly back then. Only Arnold compares.


Good post. People forget just how great Haney was. And dominant.
Logged

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #83 on: July 10, 2015, 02:04:07 AM »
Quote from: The_Iron_Disciple on July 10, 2015, 01:40:06 AM

Good post. People forget just how great Haney was. And dominant.

Didn't hurt that he was the classiest Olympian ever. Complete gentleman always.
Logged

The_Iron_Disciple

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6493
  • Team New Dad
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #84 on: July 10, 2015, 02:24:55 AM »
Quote from: The Ugly on July 10, 2015, 02:04:07 AM
Didn't hurt that he was the classiest Olympian ever. Complete gentleman always.


Truth !!
Logged

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #85 on: July 10, 2015, 09:40:24 PM »
Quote from: Hulkotron on July 09, 2015, 06:59:47 PM
He would be smaller without his all-you-can-eat insulin buffet which Lee did not have at his disposal.

You're point being... Everyone, would be smaller without slin and gh. Would Flex have beaten Haney in Haney's era without the use of slin, gh and synthol -- I don't think so. I trained in the same gym as Flex in the early 1990s and though he seemed physically perfect he didn't have that overwhelming size and presence that Haney did. And Haney was only 23 years old when he first won the O. Flex was around 26 in 1991-92 when I use to see him.

People forget how young Haney was. He is two generations removed from the Coleman era yet he was only four years older than Coleman. Age wise they were contemporaries but from a bodybuilding stand point from very different generations. Haney was the last of the legit bodybuilders (if there is such a thing) until the distorted mass monsters took over.
Logged

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #86 on: July 10, 2015, 10:58:37 PM »
Quote from: pellius on July 10, 2015, 09:40:24 PM
You're point being... Everyone, would be smaller without slin and gh. Would Flex have beaten Haney in Haney's era without the use of slin, gh and synthol -- I don't think so. I trained in the same gym as Flex in the early 1990s and though he seemed physically perfect he didn't have that overwhelming size and presence that Haney did. And Haney was only 23 years old when he first won the O. Flex was around 26 in 1991-92 when I use to see him.

People forget how young Haney was. He is two generations removed from the Coleman era yet he was only four years younger than Coleman. Age wise they were contemporaries but from a bodybuilding stand point from very different generations. Haney was the last of the legit bodybuilders (if there is such a thing) until the distorted mass monsters took over.

I'm glad Haney competed when he did. We're, therefore, left with iconic images of a statuesque physique, rather than some grotesque lab experiment.
Logged

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #87 on: July 10, 2015, 11:15:49 PM »
I am no fan of Heath and a huge fan of Haney. I like him better than Coleman though I put Coleman as second and Haney at third. But if he was competing today in his prime I think Phil would beat him easily. Phil is so much thicker and heavily muscled compared to Haney. Phil's arms, quads and arms makes Haney look skinny. And, though it's not as structurally wide, his back is also much thicker than Haney


Logged

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18793
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #88 on: July 11, 2015, 12:52:24 AM »
Quote from: pellius on July 10, 2015, 09:40:24 PM
You're point being... Everyone, would be smaller without slin and gh. Would Flex have beaten Haney in Haney's era without the use of slin, gh and synthol -- I don't think so. I trained in the same gym as Flex in the early 1990s and though he seemed physically perfect he didn't have that overwhelming size and presence that Haney did. And Haney was only 23 years old when he first won the O. Flex was around 26 in 1991-92 when I use to see him.

People forget how young Haney was. He is two generations removed from the Coleman era yet he was only four years younger than Coleman. Age wise they were contemporaries but from a bodybuilding stand point from very different generations. Haney was the last of the legit bodybuilders (if there is such a thing) until the distorted mass monsters took over.

Haney is not 4 years younger than Ronnie. He is 5 yrs older
Logged

Papper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10323
  • Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #89 on: July 11, 2015, 02:48:52 AM »
Haney looks great. Phil looks like shit.

Most agree! It's very simple. More mass on a weak frame is not better in any way.
Logged

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #90 on: July 11, 2015, 02:59:35 AM »
Quote from: Bevo on July 11, 2015, 12:52:24 AM
Haney is not 4 years younger than Ronnie. He is 5 yrs older

Right. Got it reversed. Still it's amazing that they are the same generation age wise but from vastly different eras bbing wise.
Logged

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #91 on: July 11, 2015, 05:23:07 AM »
Paul Shawn Kevin flex Nasser Cormier I'd even take baker over Heath ...

Phil is an average pro with great arms that's it. 

Logged
choice is an illusion

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #92 on: July 11, 2015, 06:33:17 AM »
Quote from: Wiggs on July 09, 2015, 10:16:18 AM
The first of his gifts...Dareem Should have won this show.

Darren won that show.... Bbing judging is so corrupt
Logged
choice is an illusion

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #93 on: July 11, 2015, 07:16:43 AM »
Haney for the win! No way Heath makes him look "skinny."
Logged

TheShape.

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6217
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #94 on: July 11, 2015, 08:39:25 AM »
Comparing Phil to a great like Haney.  ::)
Logged

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11821
  • Getbig!
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #95 on: July 11, 2015, 12:47:26 PM »
Quote from: Papper on July 11, 2015, 02:48:52 AM
Haney looks great. Phil looks like shit.

Most agree! It's very simple. More mass on a weak frame is not better in any way.


End of thread.




Woooshhhhhhh
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 80168
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #96 on: July 11, 2015, 06:58:36 PM »
 ;)
Logged

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #97 on: July 11, 2015, 09:49:09 PM »
Logged
choice is an illusion

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #98 on: July 12, 2015, 11:41:57 AM »
Quote from: mesmorph78 on July 11, 2015, 09:49:09 PM
Flex wheeler all day
Wheeler all day long, both narrow, but Flex with better structure and much better flow and lines... Both with round muscle bellies and about the same mass wise, but Flex looked much better... SEO arguments doesn't work since both used a lot...
Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15308
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Who is Phil better than from the 90s?
« Reply #99 on: July 12, 2015, 12:24:07 PM »
Phil and Ronnie are by far the 2 best BB who ever walked on that planet. None of those clowns mentioned in that thread comes close to #1 and #2 of all time ::)

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »