You keep writing this yet you have zero evidence at all.
She dominates because shes the best by far.
When was her division strong by the way?
Her division has NEVER been strong, it's a new sport, it might be a hundred years before it becomes comparable to a mens fighting roster. I have pointed this out before in this thread, female fighting will likely always be weak, as women aren't drawn to fighting sports, it's not in their DNA the way it is a mans. And for this reason women aren't generally good at fighting coupled with a low participation rate and you end up with an unequal playing field. This isn't rocket science.
The sport of female MMA is more than likely to be an anomaly, a passing fad that is unlikely to last, especially once Rhonda retires and there is no longer anyone to draw in the feminist morons.
And she dominates a WEAK division, that's the whole point, YES she is dominant, but against weak competition, so it's not the accomplishment all the Rhonda nuthuggers want you to believe.
And the evidence is in a basic appraisal of her opponents skillset, from their poor striking skills, their stance, their technique (or lack of it), their poor coordination etc... If you can't see this with your own eyes than you obviously lack any personal fighting experience, any amateur can recognize the obvious deficiencies is in the womens skill-set, even Rhondas skills (outside of Judo) are pretty obvious and easily criticized.
I know you feminist nutguggers want to believe men and women are equal, but they are not, and female fighting will always be an oddity/freak-show and run second place to real fighters (the men). Women can never catch-up to men who have been fighting since the beginning of time. It is absurd to think that women can achieve a strong division in fighting in a few years when it has taken men eons of fighting to develop their equally matched and deep pools of fighting talent.
