Author Topic: New Dirty Harry film in the works..! (Read 13758 times)

The Ugly · « **Reply #50 on:** August 31, 2015, 08:52:04 AM »

Fuck, at least get Denzel.

Yamcha · « **Reply #51 on:** August 31, 2015, 08:56:54 AM »

Will Smith is just terrible.
Absolutely terrible.

Royalty · « **Reply #52 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:02:20 AM »

The Rock would've been a better choice.

The Ugly · « **Reply #53 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:12:15 AM »

Quote from: Kahn.N.Singh on August 31, 2015, 08:57:58 AM

Good call. Denzel is M-O-T because, at least, he is half-HWhite.

I saw that damn film at the theater, first thing I remember him in. Not too bad, really. St. Elsewhere soon after.

hench · « **Reply #54 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:13:42 AM »

Aww hell no

Quote from: Royalty on August 31, 2015, 09:02:20 AM

The Rock would've been a better choice.

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #55 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:24:07 AM »

Quote from: kreator on August 31, 2015, 08:48:16 AM

i thought Dirty Harry hated black people

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #56 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:27:10 AM »

1:50 = Teach me how to build a model airplane, i'll show you how to pick a lock??

The Ugly · « **Reply #57 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:47:39 AM »

Quote from: Army of One on August 31, 2015, 09:42:11 AM

Hugh Jackman or a slimmed down russell crowe was the right choice.Tom Hardy too

Leave it the fuck alone would be more right.

hench · « **Reply #58 on:** August 31, 2015, 09:55:46 AM »

Exactly, hardys a midget, jackman just doesn't fit. Clint just pisses all over todays crop

Quote from: The Ugly on August 31, 2015, 09:47:39 AM

Leave it the fuck alone would be more right.

Alucard · « **Reply #59 on:** August 31, 2015, 10:01:30 AM »

Quote from: The Ugly on August 31, 2015, 09:47:39 AM

Leave it the fuck alone would be more right.

This, obviously... It's not a matter of "racism", just that certain things should be left alone, Harry Callahan is Clint Eastwood, period... Idris Elba for a James Bond? No problem, good actor with the right look...

andreisdaman · « **Reply #60 on:** August 31, 2015, 12:21:01 PM »

Quote from: Kwon_2 on August 31, 2015, 08:39:56 AM

He is still addressing fictional characters.

so you are saying that Jesus is FICTIONAL?

andreisdaman · « **Reply #61 on:** August 31, 2015, 12:22:52 PM »

Quote from: Shizzo on August 31, 2015, 08:41:34 AM

I did it intentionally. You were supposed to have seen what I did there.

I did...very clever....didn't want to give you credit...but you deserve it

milone79 · « **Reply #62 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:15:38 PM »

what really saddens me about this is Hollywood is fresh out of ideas....why don't the Jews who run Hollywood put all their minds and money together and come up with some fresh ideas for movies instead of ruining classics by re-making them?

Army of One · « **Reply #63 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:23:40 PM »

Quote from: The Ugly on August 31, 2015, 09:47:39 AM

Leave it the fuck alone would be more right.

I agree, but if it absolutely HAS to be remade then my point stands.

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #64 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:24:28 PM »

Quote from: milone79 on August 31, 2015, 01:15:38 PM

what really saddens me about this is Hollywood is fresh out of ideas....why don't the Jews who run Hollywood put all their minds and money together and come up with some fresh ideas for movies instead of ruining classics by re-making them?

Because people are sheep that's why.
They know people will go watch these "Reboots" they make that make use of an old franchise.

Saves alot of time and energy when they don't have to think and come up with totally new ideas, since they know they still can make a boatload of money off these reboots.

Total Recall (Colin farrell? lol), Poltergeist, Karate Kid, Clash of the Titans, Planet of the Apes, Rollerball, Psycho, Amityville Horror etc etc etc

hench · « **Reply #65 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:26:57 PM »

because everything has been done and re done andt that's just how it is so if they want to develop a tough, no shit cop moviethey should just make one and don't call it dirty harry! The thing is they craftily want to get a new audience but they use the brand name to get old fans interested even though they know the fans won't be pleased.
The other thing is what iconic characters are being created these days that are owned by a particular actor? NONE, all are replaceable but that's what they don't get about these classic films they have a star that is/was that character and embodies it! It's just not happening today especially with all these superhero movies about where they just change up the cast if they don't think the last one worked.

Quote from: milone79 on August 31, 2015, 01:15:38 PM

what really saddens me about this is Hollywood is fresh out of ideas....why don't the Jews who run Hollywood put all their minds and money together and come up with some fresh ideas for movies instead of ruining classics by re-making them?

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #66 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:29:30 PM »

They can get a bunch of extra customers/moviegoers only by using the name of a well-known franchise as well.

That's why they don't use the name "Random Cop" which they very well could have.

The pull an old franchise has over old fans from yore is just too strong.

The_Punisher · « **Reply #67 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:47:48 PM »

what's new?....it's just Hollywood trying to ruin another Classic......

BlackMetallic · « **Reply #68 on:** August 31, 2015, 01:49:42 PM »

Quote from: The Ugly on August 31, 2015, 09:47:39 AM

Leave it the fuck alone would be more right.

Agreed +2

Hugh Jackmans resemblance to clint when the first x-men movie hit in 2000 was quite remarkable. Obviously hugh wasnt even made up to look like clint but the comparrisons started .

If they were to recast he'd be the one imo.

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #69 on:** August 31, 2015, 02:03:39 PM »

Heard they will call it Dirty Hebrew

Fortress · « **Reply #70 on:** August 31, 2015, 03:10:52 PM »

Gigantic Dirty Harry fan. Own all the movies.

This is a pure shit decision, if true.

Not to mention, in 2015, the PC intensity is at such an all-time high, that so much of what makes Dirty Harry Harry won't fly with the young offended-at-everything crowd. Harry is nothing if not politically INCORRECT.

thebrink · « **Reply #71 on:** August 31, 2015, 03:13:44 PM »

Quote from: Papper on August 31, 2015, 06:39:05 AM

Has nothing to do with race it's about changing a established concept, like casting Britney Speas to play Gandalf. Understand?

Kwon was making it about race, as he does with everything lol.

Point is , Will Smith is the furthest thing from a bad ass there is and you could almost call this casting decision comedic.

The Scott · « **Reply #72 on:** August 31, 2015, 03:16:47 PM »

If true, pass. And I will pass as I have never ever viewed the PC version of 'The Wild, Wild West". Stupid Hollyweird libtards. So eager to grab their ankles when trying to grab our wallets.

To Hell with them.

hench · « **Reply #73 on:** August 31, 2015, 03:17:54 PM »

good points there and everyones becoming pussified with this pc shit

Quote from: Fortress on August 31, 2015, 03:10:52 PM

Gigantic Dirty Harry fan. Own all the movies.

This is a pure shit decision, if true.

Not to mention, in 2015, the PC intensity is at such an all-time high, that so much of what makes Dirty Harry Harry won't fly with the young offended-at-everything crowd. Harry is nothing if not politically INCORRECT.

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #74 on:** August 31, 2015, 03:18:31 PM »

Quote from: Fortress on August 31, 2015, 03:10:52 PM

Gigantic Dirty Harry fan. Own all the movies.

This is a pure shit decision, if true.

Not to mention, in 2015, the PC intensity is at such an all-time high, that so much of what makes Dirty Harry Harry won't fly with the young offended-at-everything crowd. Harry is nothing if not politically INCORRECT.

What Harry did back then won't be as appreciated in today's liberal PC society

James Bond gone through a change to "adapt" to the current state of affairs, and so will probably Harry.

It won't be Dirty Harry (as we know him) anymore.