I wonder if the judge acted like a pissy little child and refused to tell her what she did wrong and why she was being thrown in jail.
The Judge acted exactly how you would expect a Judge to act when someone refuses to follow a lawful court order.
I heard that she asked him why she was being thrown in jail and the judge said "you know what you did...I don't have to tell you"
What a bunch of bullshit you're spewing. The Judge explicitly told her what to do, and explicitly told her that if she continued to refuse to comply, she'd be jailed for contempt of court. She refused, and so she's in jail for contempt. This is what happens when you refuse to follow an explicit and unambiguous order of the Court.
You'd have thought he would have at least had the balls to explain his reasoning and judgement
He explained his reasoning very clearly in the decision where he
quite explicitly ordered her to follow the law. She refused and she continued to refused. That's
textbook contempt (
18 USC 401) and the Judge was within his legal authority.