It's not the same. MSNBC is unmatchable. Full of hacks. Al Sharpton has his own show. Seriously? O'Donnell? There is a reason why Fox crushes them in ratings across the board.
The fact Fox has liberals on all of their opinion shows helps make them fair and balanced.
Hard news and opinion shows are not the same.
You're seriously using ratings to validate "balance"? Shall we likewise use record sales to determine Bieber's overall musical relevance?
Sharpton/O'Donnell = stooges, agreed. Beck/Palin/Rove = what, fair and balanced? All regulars on Fox. They're fucking hacks, guy. Ingraham, Coulter ... c'mon, dude. Hannity as well, maybe to a lesser extent, but barely.
This is just blind allegiance; you won't see it because they're yours. They
were mine, too, but I got over the cheerleader nonsense. Much easier to see them now for what they are.
Anyway, thanks for the back and forth. Think I've lost interest here.