Here's how a normal person thinks Tim and it's as simple as this. If someone breaks into my home and threatens my family or just flat out breaks into my home it's a natural instinct to protect them with a gun, with a cannon, with a fucking rocket launcher, with a bat , a knife a slingshot or whatever I can get my hands on to, again, protect my loved ones I'm going to do it despite any law. I wouldn't give a fuck if it were stand your ground or otherwise. Like MOST, if someone breaks in they should know they're not walking out.
as was stated before, protecting your home from an intruder is not what Stand Your Ground laws are about. Protecting your home from an intruder was justifiable long before Stand Your Ground laws became popular. (BTW, no Stand Your Ground laws in California, but we do have Castle Doctrine.)
But a normal person should think that if the chances of needing to protect my children from an intruder is X, and the chances of my children getting hurt or killed from the thing I use to protect my children from an intruder is Y, and Y is much greater than X, I probably should find another way to protect my children from the unlikely chance of an intruder. 1 866 24 7 4 9 99