You seem to think the 1994 Mr Olympia was a travisty on par with the 1980 Mr Olympia but after going through some of my magazines covering the contest nothing could be further than that , the general consenus is Yates won , he wasn't as good as 93 but good enough to win , and he should have NOT won the symmetry round with a perfect score .
quote Flex Jan 1995 " Let it be recorded tthat in the immediate aftermath of the contest , none of his closest rivals even hinted that Yates did not deserve to win . "
quote Shawn Ray Flex Jan 1995 " Tonight I feel I got what I deserved "
quote Flex Jan 1995 " As Yates , Levrone and Ray stood onstage , the reiging champ ( cognizant of 1992 ) told Levrone " Looks like it's you and me again " Mr Olympia got it wrong , and the booing deciblel dwarfed that accorded the Dillet announcement as Kevin Levrone was called out in third "
quote Ironman Jan 1995 " Since he ( Ray ) was trailing Levrone by four points going into round 3 ( posing round ) Shawn was going to have to equal his showing of seven years ago ( Nationals win ) to have a chance of passing Levrone "
quote Ironman Jan 1995 " The battle was between Shawn and Kevin for second "
quote Ironman Jan 1995 former IFBB judge Roger Schwab " Yates is simply in another league. When he turns his back and flexes , he's the only man onstage. "
quote " Shawn Ray in a rout. He was better than ever. Any criticism is a stretch for a reporter to fill space. That such magnificence is litterally crushed by Yates is a sobering thought ."
I have the muscle mag article that covers the contest and it goes to great lengths to convey not only the sense of total shock when Dorian won, but also with Lenda Murry (super-depleted and small) winning over a career best shape Laura Cravealle.
It also makes arguments for BOTH Shawn and Kevin beating Dorian that day, and given that Kevin vs Yates back shot, its not hard to see why.

horrible abs that year..

horrible back too - but then, given the kevin shot, we alread knew that.

yup, Yates should have won alright

His midsection at 263 looked worse than Ronnie's at 296!!!!!

Arnold would be jeleous!!!


Yates was ripped to the bone that year


fantastic taper!!!!!

And then you have Shawn, who was not as tall, not as wide, but looked 34234 times better in every way:

When you take away Yates' razor sharp lower back, upper back, left biceps, abs, and then factor in all of yates normal flaws (arms, quads), add in a film of water, you have NO ARGUMENT left on how he could possibly win (other than lat width and body height - Mr. O's can't be short according to the judges), but that in itself is not enough, would you not agree?)
How can you love Dorian's cock that much not to see that he looked like CRAP that year?? (and shawn looked FANTASTIC)
Question for ND:
Given that you like Zane, Revees, Labrada, etc etc, how in the WORLD could you POSSIBLY favor Dorian that year over Shawn?
You are totally incosistent in your standards.
If you choose Dorian over ray in 1994, shouldn't you be campaining for Greg Kovacs to be the next Mr. O? Afterall, he is a mass monster with a gut?
ps- some of your quotes may be refering to Yates in general, not specifically to the 1994 Olympia - eg. Yates back was soft and watery in 1994, but most other times, it is dry.