It's rare when flowery language like "When God wiped out nations of pagan folks it's because they came into the fullness of their sin and God passed judgment upon them. Pregnant, pagan women that would've given birth to future Godless pagans that would've been eternally separated from God were wiped out." doesn't whitewash the stench of what it is saying.. but this is one of those rare times..
In my experience this is how God haters tend to view scripture:
Let's say 50 verses say God is loving and good.
Let's say 50 other verses are called into question.
Let's say 40 of the verses are explained and then align with the 50 verses indicating the goodness of God.
10 of the verses didn't have complete context included and could be perceived as good or bad.
The God hater then deems the verses are absolutely bad regardless of the predominance of the good and lack of clear context.
I have rarely heard or read a God hater stating, "you know, you did reconcile the majority of my objections and although you didn't a few of them I think it's safe to assume the unreconciled verses shouldn't be deemed negative in light of the others."
Oh, you still haven't answered any of my questions.