NE: Multiple Ted Cruz affairs with pics, names, evidence. This is bad.

[Agnostic007]

1. Did you see some of the pics deleted by her when it broke?  2. Did you see the 9 month backwards timeline, from convention?  3. Did you know of the closet thing?   4. and how many sweet/flirty tweets from her do you know about?  5.Also, did you know about the matching fake tattoos?

You knew about all that, right?   6. Because the daddy thing is a very small part of what looks to be a shady connection there.  And to me, if a man lets himself get put in that many weak moments, it's poor judgment all the way.  

My guess is that you knew about the daddy thing and not much else.  DId you know all those other details?

1. did you? what were the pics of? Link to pics, because if they were on the net, they are still on the net.

2.  Did  you see the 9 month backwards timeline? If so, what does that prove and why?

3. Did YOU see the "closet thing"? What is the closet thing and what is the source of the closet thing? What is the evidence supporting the closet assertion?

4. Can you post any "sweet" "flirty" tweets you feel support your conclusion they had an affair?

5. Picks of the matching fake tattoos, context in which it happened, and why it means they were having sex

6. The Daddy thing shows you will swallow anything as "proof" as long as it fits your conclusion. Same thing happened when the officer placed the taser near the body.


I see a pattern here where you shotgun a bunch of innuendos and questionable allegations with little support, in question form, pretending they mean something. You just hope something will stick..

 

[Dos Equis]

Is today the day we see the video of Cruz having sex with hookers and video of the Cruz love child?  News at 11. 

there is video of him on tues/thurs having regular hookups.  there was a closet incident at 2012 convention and there may be offspring with identical facial features.

Video hasn't been released publicly, but Rubio did release it to several media outlets.  Breitbart chose to sit on it.  NE did not.  Don't you watch OReilly?  He already covered this.

[Agnostic007]

Is today the day we see the video of Cruz having sex with hookers and video of the Cruz love child?  News at 11. 

Does he know that if video is released to media news outlets, it IS considered released publicly ?

[Dos Equis]

Does he know that if video is released to media news outlets, it IS considered released publicly ?

Probably not.  But he is a compulsive liar, so the facts don't really matter. 

[loco]

Dang, it's pretty bad when atheists and theists, Jews and Muslims, the mailman and the dog unite to call 240 out on his bs.    

[Dos Equis]

Dang, it's pretty bad when atheists and theists, Jews and Muslims, the mailman and the dog unite to call 240 out on his bs.    

lol   

[GigantorX]

The funny thing... I'm not sure I hear ANY getbigger saying "NO WAY would ted cruz call escorts or sign up for side dish on ashley madison".

Instead, the talk is all "but you can't PROVE it TODAY, 240!"

The smoke is there, the stink is there... he's not a safe pick anymore.  We have the convention coming, the GOP can choose someone without trump liberalism or Cruz stink.  He's just not a safe bet.

Or... will anyone stand up and say "I completely, 100% believe Cruz never had an AM account, never called this escort service!"   

Where is the smoke and the stink? There isn't any evidence out there. None, zero.

[TuHolmes]

The funny thing... I'm not sure I hear ANY getbigger saying "NO WAY would ted cruz call escorts or sign up for side dish on ashley madison".

Instead, the talk is all "but you can't PROVE it TODAY, 240!"

The smoke is there, the stink is there... he's not a safe pick anymore.  We have the convention coming, the GOP can choose someone without trump liberalism or Cruz stink.  He's just not a safe bet.

Or... will anyone stand up and say "I completely, 100% believe Cruz never had an AM account, never called this escort service!"   

You are making the allegation or at least listening to allegations and presenting them. The burden of proof is on you.

Us not saying there is "NO WAY" is exactly like you saying "HE DEFINITELY DID".

When the reality is that there is a middle ground of "maybe he did, but we need proof before we condemn a man."

[Straw Man]

You are making the allegation or at least listening to allegations and presenting them. The burden of proof is on you.

Us not saying there is "NO WAY" is exactly like you saying "HE DEFINITELY DID".

When the reality is that there is a middle ground of "maybe he did, but we need proof before we condemn a man."

you're saying that 240's super sensitive nose is not  enough proof for you?

[TuHolmes]

you're saying that 240's super sensitive nose is not  enough proof for you?

Woofer and Wimper he is not.

[Straw Man]

I was the first one to call Carson a liar and point out his inconsistencies.
I was the first one to call Cain a liar with all those accusers.

After being mocked for not having the full court conviction on day 1 (by short sighted people), I was proven correct both times.  

I was the first one who pointed out the Cruz sex scandal shit, and I am mocked for it.  THat's okay.  For a decade, I've been first with stories like this on getbig, taken 2 months of hate from partisan hacks who always support mccain or romney... THEN they get all silent when their hero finally pitifully admits a little wrongdoing and slinks away.


This will be the same.  Laugh now.  Cruz stinks too bad.  There are too many angles of shady for him to be clean.  He had an ashley madison account.  THat's really bad.  He's gonna be revealed in this DC Madam case, that's devastating.  And if he's busted on those 2... does anyone really believe that living apart from family for years, he didn't do some of the other things?

It'll come out if he's nominated, and when it does, getbig will be the same.  Coach will disappear for a week.  Dos Equis will start a tantrum that I only showed 5 of 7 sex claims to be proven (LOL!)  and the dem will win again in 2016 because you cuckholds can't just walk away from a flawed candidate when you smell one.  

you really are gullible

There is no proof that Ted Cruz had a AM account.

Anyone could have applied for an AM account using ANYONE's email address

I can't stand Cruz and I don't think he's even that bright but I think he would be smart to not use an address from a ".gov" account with his name on it.

Again, I'm more than willing to throw him under the bus if any actual proof shows up

[240 is Back]

and the media is not really reporting this cause what? ......they are all in the tank for Hil and know Cruz is a much harder challenge then Trump yet they're just sitting on all of this except you?

The media?   Which media?  Lots of sites are covering it and talking about it.  Rachel Maddow talks about it twice a week and loves the story.  Megyn Kelly used it to come at cruz last week.

there isn't a big story (yet) because the lawyer isn't dropping names yet.  He seems like a drama queen... he'll wait until right before convention or a major state to do it, I'd bet. 

[240 is Back]

Probably not.  But he is a compulsive liar, so the facts don't really matter. 

you ate my feces on the carson/cain stories, didn't you?    You will here too. 

[240 is Back]

There is no proof that Ted Cruz had a AM account.
Anyone could have applied for an AM account using ANYONE's email address

Right.   Yet only he is framed for it.  So weird. 

It's nothing conclusive, but it's one of many pieces which stack up to tell us he ain't the safest bet to run against Hilary in 2016. 

I can just imagine any of us trying to explain to wifey why we got blown up on the Ashley Madison thing... "Oh honey, I was obviously framed, you can't PROVE I did that..."  Yeah, you're not going to jail, but she knows you are full of shit on it.   

This is like that.  I'm not saying impeach his ass because of it.  I'm saying it's another sign he isn't the safe pick.

[240 is Back]

You are making the allegation or at least listening to allegations and presenting them. The burden of proof is on you.

The big thing is the 2016 convention.   They're gonna pick the veep.  Likely on the 2nd round or later, once Trump takes the shit.   

They have to look at Cruz, and decide if the risk is worth it.  For me, for the sake of getbig discussion, I think he is no longer a safe bet.  Weak denial and blaming Trump for something we all saw team Rubio doing... he's been shady on the accusations, which stinks to me.

If the Ashley Madison stinks a little, and the denial is vague/weird, and he's done all these cute things like matching tattoos with hot 22 year old girls who work for him...

Eh, to ME, personally, he just looks like a high risk candidate.  AND if there is a credible lawyer with ironclad records claiming someone in the race now was knee deep in hooker booty in 97 and he's about to release the records to prove it... AND a paper that won a Pulitzer spanking Edwards for an affair made big claims...

He's just not a safe pick.  IMO, repubs should just pick Ryan, or Thune, or Portman, or Rubio, or whoever... strong conservative that isn't on Ashley Madison, that isn't vaguely denying affairs while wearing matching tats with young girls...   Just not the safe pick anymore.  I'm not saying he's this or that... I'm saying the stink is starting to add up, and repubs would be nuts to ignore it when making their selection at the convention.

[polychronopolous]

Dang, it's pretty bad when atheists and theists, Jews and Muslims, the mailman and the dog unite to call 240 out on his bs.    

I think this is the first time in the history of the Political Board that 99% of the people on here have agreed with something.

[240 is Back]

1. did you? what were the pics of? Link to pics, because if they were on the net, they are still on the net.
2.  Did  you see the 9 month backwards timeline? If so, what does that prove and why?
3. Did YOU see the "closet thing"? What is the closet thing and what is the source of the closet thing? What is the evidence supporting the closet assertion?
4. Can you post any "sweet" "flirty" tweets you feel support your conclusion they had an affair?
5. Picks of the matching fake tattoos, context in which it happened, and why it means they were having sex
6. The Daddy thing shows you will swallow anything as "proof" as long as it fits your conclusion. Same thing happened when the officer placed the taser near the body.
I see a pattern here where you shotgun a bunch of innuendos and questionable allegations with little support, in question form, pretending they mean something. You just hope something will stick..

With all due respect... You should not have to ask these questions.

If you aren't aware of these things - and the subsequent deletions on social media - then you should spend 15 minutes reading the stack of things, before coming on getbig and asking about it.  Just google it - the sites with pics do a far better job describing it than I could.  

Look at the pics, they tell a lot.  Matching tats and all those tweets, it's flirty at best, inappropriate at worst.  Someone accidentally uses Cruz' email to sign up at Ashley Madison, it's shady at best.  Someone accidentally uses Ted's phone to order hookers, coming soon?

The nation gets it too - Cruz numbers have sank since this affair accusation and his very tepid denial.  People smell it.

[240 is Back]

I think this is the first time in the history of the Political Board that 99% of the people on here have agreed with something.

And when this lawyer come out, and says "In 97, Ted Cruz called this escort service several times"...

The ENTIRE argument will shift to "well, maybe someone else used his phone" and "maybe he was calling them to ask for directions..."


I smelled shady on cain's denial.  I smelled shady on Carson's denial.  And I smell shady on Cruz's denial.   That's just me.  It's funny when 99% of the place feels one way, but the way I pwned the shit out of people on cain/carson, they WANT me to be very wrong here.  I guess we'll see!

[240 is Back]

FOX NEWS RADIO:  1 hour ago.

http://radio.foxnews.com/2016/04/15/sibley-i-dont-want-to-spend-the-election-cycle-in-jail/

Lawyer searching for a way to release the names without going to jail.

Maintains it'll have a monster effect on the 2016 Prez election.

[Straw Man]

The big thing is the 2016 convention.   They're gonna pick the veep.  Likely on the 2nd round or later, once Trump takes the shit.   

They have to look at Cruz, and decide if the risk is worth it.  For me, for the sake of getbig discussion, I think he is no longer a safe bet.  Weak denial and blaming Trump for something we all saw team Rubio doing... he's been shady on the accusations, which stinks to me.

If the Ashley Madison stinks a little, and the denial is vague/weird, and he's done all these cute things like matching tattoos with hot 22 year old girls who work for him...

Eh, to ME, personally, he just looks like a high risk candidate.  AND if there is a credible lawyer with ironclad records claiming someone in the race now was knee deep in hooker booty in 97 and he's about to release the records to prove it... AND a paper that won a Pulitzer spanking Edwards for an affair made big claims...

He's just not a safe pick.  IMO, repubs should just pick Ryan, or Thune, or Portman, or Rubio, or whoever... strong conservative that isn't on Ashley Madison, that isn't vaguely denying affairs while wearing matching tats with young girls...   Just not the safe pick anymore.  I'm not saying he's this or that... I'm saying the stink is starting to add up, and repubs would be nuts to ignore it when making their selection at the convention.

credible lawyer?

you mean the guy that had his license suspended

iron clad proof ?

maybe you should wait until you actually see it to make that claim

Cruz's only job is to displace Trump and then get his ass handed to him in the general election and he's a perfectly safe pick for both of those roles

[TuHolmes]

And when this lawyer come out, and says "In 97, Ted Cruz called this escort service several times"...

The ENTIRE argument will shift to "well, maybe someone else used his phone" and "maybe he was calling them to ask for directions..."


I smelled shady on cain's denial.  I smelled shady on Carson's denial.  And I smell shady on Cruz's denial.   That's just me.  It's funny when 99% of the place feels one way, but the way I pwned the shit out of people on cain/carson, they WANT me to be very wrong here.  I guess we'll see!

First it's "If" and second he wasn't married in 97 so who gives a shit if he paid some high priced whore?

[polychronopolous]

And when this lawyer come out, and says "In 97, Ted Cruz called this escort service several times"...

The ENTIRE argument will shift to "well, maybe someone else used his phone" and "maybe he was calling them to ask for directions..."


I smelled shady on cain's denial.  I smelled shady on Carson's denial.  And I smell shady on Cruz's denial.   That's just me.  It's funny when 99% of the place feels one way, but the way I pwned the shit out of people on cain/carson, they WANT me to be very wrong here.  I guess we'll see!

Nobody is saying the possibility of some horseplay isn't there but the problem is you always seem to take it to some level like you are trying to put together a 2 hour major motion film with all these Hollywood angles (bastard child, sex tapes, set Tuesday and Thursday schedule etc etc)

[240 is Back]

First it's "If" and second he wasn't married in 97 so who gives a shit if he paid some high priced whore?

he has denied it.  this would make him a liar. 
he's running as a conservative, religious, all that.  I don't think the repub base shows up to vote for him if he used hookers before marriage.

I don't care if politicians bang whores (unless they're sending other to prison for it).   But I would HATE to see Hilary cakewalk into the white house because Cruz accepts the nomination and then Hilary promptly releases this info, Obama pardons the guy, and Dems get another 8 years in the white house.

[Straw Man]

First it's "If" and second he wasn't married in 97 so who gives a shit if he paid some high priced whore?

If true it would likely still be a big problem whether he was married or not

If Cruz had to go out and publicly admit he did this I think he would be toast

[TuHolmes]

he has denied it.  this would make him a liar. 
he's running as a conservative, religious, all that.  I don't think the repub base shows up to vote for him if he used hookers before marriage.

I don't care if politicians bang whores (unless they're sending other to prison for it).   But I would HATE to see Hilary cakewalk into the white house because Cruz accepts the nomination and then Hilary promptly releases this info, Obama pardons the guy, and Dems get another 8 years in the white house.

People lie about sexual things that are deemed "inappropriate". Like Bill Clinton... Lying about a BJ.

Who gives a shit?

These are things that shouldn't even be asked in the first place.