yep
i remember buying a top spec graphics card for quake
only for it to run at about one frame a minute
shit
Quake 1 was pure CPU until GLQuake came out.
I know, because mistakes were made on my part, too - at that time I saved up $600 to upgrade my pc and instead of going with a Pentium 166, I went with the cheaper, IBM 686-166.
A big mistake - as the floating point of those processors was fucking useless compared to the p166 and I paid with shitty performance in Quake.
I then tried to buy more video ram for my video card - again, mistakes were made, that wasn't the problem.
Wasn't until I got a voodoo3 that things got good.
Adonis's words are not fully accurate - if you have a powerful pc, your time spent fiddling with games or having problems with them is pretty much zero (buy on steam, run, play), but then, what would you expect when you have a 700US video card in your system? In fact, the more you spend, the less trouble you will have - but consoles will only give you 60fps max.
Also, citing the versions on consoles being better is only exposing your lack of experience with pc gaming. PC Gamers, experienced PC gamers know that if the game is cross platform, the PC version will invariably be a lazily conceived piece of shit. Don't even go there.
I would suggest those of you with PS4s try PSVR somewhere, when it comes out. I have a HTC Vive and it is a better gaming experience than anything I have ever experienced. By a long long way. The Vive, with its ability to move around a room and interact with shit is really the king at the moment, but the PSVR will be a fair bit cheaper for those of you who already have the console.
Be skeptical about VR - because it'll only make the rebuttal when you actually try it, more amusing.