Author Topic: Best Arms Ever? Sorry Ronnie , Sorry Phil (Read 33545 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **on:** July 22, 2016, 02:50:20 PM »

I always said Priest

http://www.musculardevelopment.com/news/the-mcgough-report/15111-best-arms-ever-lee-priest-or-roelly-winklaar.html#.V5Fa6OuAOko

1 - Lee Priest: Thick, round and developed from every angle. He gets the vote because of the sheer unequalled balance between all aspects of his massive arm development.

2 - Roelly Winklaar: Just so much mass just hangs from his upper limbs, that his arms just stop the show when he’s “on”. Tough choice between him and Priest.

3 - Phil Heath: Round muscle bellies, razor triceps and huge forearms that look like they have another biceps in the flexor region.

4 - Paul Dillett: Long muscle bellies with thickness and shape.

5 - Marko Savlanein: My pick for the craziest biceps peak ever. (Marko from Finland hit the scene like a meteor in 1997, but quickly burnt out.)

Honorable mentions: Aaron Baker, Joe Bucci, Boyer Coe, Josef Grolmus, Mike Matarazzo, Eddie Moyzan, Alois Pek, Sergio Oliva, Freddy Ortiz, Thierry Pastel, Jose Raymond, Vince Taylor, Casey Viator, Robby Robinson, Flex Wheeler

Hulkotron · « **Reply #1 on:** July 22, 2016, 03:01:11 PM »

Ron not in the top 15?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #2 on:** July 22, 2016, 03:14:17 PM »

Skeletor · « **Reply #3 on:** July 22, 2016, 03:20:35 PM »

I think Priest's forearms and short arm length made his biceps appear out of proportion/smaller than they actually were.

Thierry Pastel:

Savolainen had crazy arms back in the day:

Heath has good arms too, especially the brachioradialis, I'll give him that.

PJim · « **Reply #4 on:** July 22, 2016, 03:54:51 PM »

I'm no fan of Ronnie, but to miss him out is stupid. Where's Arnold? Who really has better looking arms in the FDB? Ridiculous. I agree with Lee being number one in terms of overall balance.

affeman · « **Reply #5 on:** July 22, 2016, 04:14:39 PM »

Quote from: Skeletor on July 22, 2016, 03:20:35 PM

Savolainen had crazy arms back in the day:

lol @ mentioning an oilbag like that in a thread about the greatest arms. Who's next, Valentino, Ernie Taylor?

affeman · « **Reply #6 on:** July 22, 2016, 04:17:32 PM »

Where's Dan Hill on that list?

MAXX · « **Reply #7 on:** July 22, 2016, 04:30:04 PM »

Roelly imo

theworm · « **Reply #8 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:08:12 PM »

Lee looked amazing. All that off of 2 cc deca and 2 cc primo X 8 weeks! Impressive!

Nether Animal · « **Reply #9 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:16:35 PM »

Royalty · « **Reply #10 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:36:50 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 22, 2016, 02:50:20 PM

I always said Priest

http://www.musculardevelopment.com/news/the-mcgough-report/15111-best-arms-ever-lee-priest-or-roelly-winklaar.html#.V5Fa6OuAOko

1 - Lee Priest: Thick, round and developed from every angle. He gets the vote because of the sheer unequalled balance between all aspects of his massive arm development.

2 - Roelly Winklaar: Just so much mass just hangs from his upper limbs, that his arms just stop the show when he’s “on”. Tough choice between him and Priest.

3 - Phil Heath: Round muscle bellies, razor triceps and huge forearms that look like they have another biceps in the flexor region.

4 - Paul Dillett: Long muscle bellies with thickness and shape.

5 - Marko Savlanein: My pick for the craziest biceps peak ever. (Marko from Finland hit the scene like a meteor in 1997, but quickly burnt out.)

Honorable mentions: Aaron Baker, Joe Bucci, Boyer Coe, Josef Grolmus, Mike Matarazzo, Eddie Moyzan, Alois Pek, Sergio Oliva, Freddy Ortiz, Thierry Pastel, Jose Raymond, Vince Taylor, Casey Viator, Robby Robinson, Flex Wheeler

No

Wiggs · « **Reply #11 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:37:03 PM »

rocket · « **Reply #12 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:47:19 PM »

Definitely not Lee

Too short.

Great arms, but too short.

Wiggs · « **Reply #13 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:48:01 PM »

Quote from: rocket on July 22, 2016, 06:47:19 PM

Definitely not Lee

Too short.

Great arms, but too short.

yep

titusisback · « **Reply #14 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:48:16 PM »

Quote from: affeman on July 22, 2016, 04:14:39 PM

lol @ mentioning an oilbag like that in a thread about the greatest arms. Who's next, Valentino, Ernie Taylor?

This guy always had freaky biceps like that, even before synthol was invented

Ronnie Rep · « **Reply #15 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:50:51 PM »

Quote from: affeman on July 22, 2016, 04:14:39 PM

lol @ mentioning an oilbag like that in a thread about the greatest arms. Who's next, Valentino, Ernie Taylor?

No oil just sick genetics for peaks in those arms.

Royalty · « **Reply #16 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:52:51 PM »

Rudee · « **Reply #17 on:** July 22, 2016, 06:57:21 PM »

Not difficult to have full arms like Priest, when the distance from shoulder to elbow is only 5".

TheShape. · « **Reply #18 on:** July 22, 2016, 07:37:41 PM »

Arnold, Scott, Sergio, Louie, Robby...all better than these clowns.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #19 on:** July 22, 2016, 07:43:20 PM »

Roelly? Roelly? HAHAHAHA! He's not even top 50 all-time.

titusisback · « **Reply #20 on:** July 22, 2016, 08:05:12 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on July 22, 2016, 07:43:20 PM

Roelly? Roelly? HAHAHAHA! He's not even top 50 all-time.

Feel free to name your top 50...

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 22, 2016, 08:39:37 PM »

Priest and Roelly have the size for amazing arms with great balance, but they are no where near as conditioned as Ronnie's or Phil for that matter. Especially from the front and back.

Best arms from the front and back. Size with conditioning.

TRIX · « **Reply #22 on:** July 22, 2016, 08:51:36 PM »

TRIX · « **Reply #23 on:** July 22, 2016, 08:53:40 PM »

If you add the most muscular and relaxed phil wins.

Parker · « **Reply #24 on:** July 22, 2016, 09:57:42 PM »

Wait, ND didn't you say before that Lee's arms were too short to have the best arms?