« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Clint Eastwood  (Read 8036 times)

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Clint Eastwood
« on: October 06, 2016, 02:27:20 PM »
Not many men can hang in there. No matter cook size, muscles, lenght, figting skills, or what the fuck ever...

Clint Eastwood have it all naturall...he is not even trying, he just got it! Ladies dripping...

Logged

SquidVicious

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2016, 02:48:08 PM »
Quote from: Julio Ceasar on October 06, 2016, 02:27:20 PM
Not many men can hang in there. No matter cook size, muscles, lenght, figting skills, or what the fuck ever...

Clint Eastwood have it all naturall...he is not even trying, he just got it! Ladies dripping...
Did you steal this post from Lookism.net or are you really that big of a beta-phag that you worship an 80 year old man?
Logged

Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3035
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2016, 03:19:28 PM »
He's 86, get it right! ;D
Logged
h

peroni

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 815
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2016, 03:28:07 PM »
How big a guy was he back in the day. He was billed at 6'4. Anyone know what he weighed? I'd guess 195-210
Logged

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17105
  • "De la concha para el culo..."
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2016, 03:32:32 PM »
So, was Clint known for having a naturally big 'cook' then?
Logged
T

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23830
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2016, 03:43:41 PM »
Clit's weak point was that he started looking 40 in his teens.
The female teachers loved him and his unnaturely mature tongue arts.
Logged
.

C-BuZz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1351
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2016, 04:21:03 PM »
Yep, ladies dripping for this hot beast.



Needs to get some Leverone signature series supps blow the f up.
Logged

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2016, 08:12:38 PM »
Clint Eastwood is the fucking man. 

His son got about 99.9% of his genes and is probably swimming in puss right now.

Logged

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2016, 08:43:14 PM »
He lived with a gay Billionaire Director very early starting out his career. Say it ain't so Clint :'(

Logged

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17790
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2016, 08:56:12 PM »
Fun fact - Clint Eastwood was once challenged to a duel by Consul General of France, and writer Romain Gary for sleeping with his wife, actress Jean Seberg.
Logged

SuperTed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6701
  • Rebirth
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2016, 03:32:40 AM »
Quite the stud in his youth.
Logged

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12159
  • Getbig!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2016, 05:13:59 AM »
Quote from: Julio Ceasar on October 06, 2016, 02:27:20 PM
Not many men can hang in there. No matter cook size, muscles, lenght, figting skills, or what the fuck ever...

Clint Eastwood have it all naturall...he is not even trying, he just got it! Ladies dripping...




LMAO ! None of that matter in acting



wOOOshhhhhhh
Logged

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12159
  • Getbig!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2016, 05:18:03 AM »
Quote from: C-BuZz on October 06, 2016, 04:21:03 PM
Yep, ladies dripping for this hot beast.



Needs to get some Leverone signature series supps blow the f up.


For those of you who wonder how Scott Weyland would have looked in his 80s....there you have it .


WoooSHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Logged

Super Natural

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1962
  • Repent of Soy liberalism.
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2016, 07:29:25 AM »
...
Logged

maxkane69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1671
  • PALUMBOISM DESTROYED BODYBUILDING!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2016, 09:42:06 AM »
Clint Eastwood would have been a nobody without this 2 men !!! ;)


Logged

stuntmovie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8946
  • Getbig!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2016, 11:17:14 AM »
MAXKANE, It appears that y9u know your movie history pretty damn well.

And I totally agree with ya that Sergio Lione is the reason behind Clint's success.

BUT ... Can you tell your fellow GetBiggers the name of CLINT's character in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY.

And who was 'the good'?
Who was 'the bad'?
And who was 'the ugly'?
Logged

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2016, 11:27:18 AM »
Quote from: stuntmovie on October 07, 2016, 11:17:14 AM
MAXKANE, It appears that y9u know your movie history pretty damn well.

And I totally agree with ya that Sergio Lione is the reason behind Clint's success.

BUT ... Can you tell your fellow GetBiggers the name of CLINT's character in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY.

And who was 'the good'?
Who was 'the bad'?
And who was 'the ugly'?

he didnt have a name
clint was good
eli wallach was bad
Lee van cleef was ugly
Logged

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24928
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2016, 11:27:22 AM »
Quote from: stuntmovie on October 07, 2016, 11:17:14 AM
MAXKANE, It appears that y9u know your movie history pretty damn well.

And I totally agree with ya that Sergio Lione is the reason behind Clint's success.

BUT ... Can you tell your fellow GetBiggers the name of CLINT's character in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY.

And who was 'the good'?  ---- Clint -- Blondie
Who was 'the bad'? --- Lee van Cleef -- Angle eyes
And who was 'the ugly'? --- Eli Wallach -- Tuco Ramirez --- The ugly


How close are them answers???
Logged

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2016, 11:28:34 AM »
Quote from: illuminati on October 07, 2016, 11:27:22 AM

How close are them answers???
blondie wasnt his name it was what Eli Wallach called him

I think you mixed up van cleef and wallach
Logged

stuntmovie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8946
  • Getbig!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2016, 12:26:40 PM »
ILLUMIJATI, I was going to agree with your answers, but then  Be There spoke up and I started thinking that, maybe I really have forgotten and Be There may be correct!'

So in an effort to avoid any Hollywood history conflicts, I'll have to do some research.

Sorry bout that.
Logged

maxkane69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1671
  • PALUMBOISM DESTROYED BODYBUILDING!
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2016, 01:28:30 PM »
Quote from: stuntmovie on October 07, 2016, 11:17:14 AM
MAXKANE, It appears that y9u know your movie history pretty damn well.

And I totally agree with ya that Sergio Lione is the reason behind Clint's success.

BUT ... Can you tell your fellow GetBiggers the name of CLINT's character in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY.

And who was 'the good'?
Who was 'the bad'?
And who was 'the ugly'?

In the English version
Clint name was "blondie"
The good was Clint Eastwood
The bad was Ely Wallach
The ugly was Lee Van Cliff



In the Italian original version " Il buono,il brutto e il cattivo"
Clint name was "biondo"
The good (il buono) was Clint Eastwood
The ugly (il brutto) was Eli Wallach
The bad (il cattivo) was Lee Van Cliff

The reasoning for this is because brutto ( ugly in Italian ) is almost always used to describe physical apparence, and Eli Wallach was less attractive than Lee Van Cliff. ;)

Logged

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2016, 01:37:03 PM »
Clint is the dude that makes Chuck Norris cry out for his mother....coolest guy alive.

Clint rules.  8)
Logged

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2016, 01:39:10 PM »
Quote from: maxkane69 on October 07, 2016, 01:28:30 PM
In the English version
Clint name was "blondie"
The good was Clint Eastwood
The bad was Ely Wallach
The ugly was Lee Van Cliff



In the Italian original version " Il buono,il brutto e il cattivo"
Clint name was "biondo"
The good (il buono) was Clint Eastwood
The ugly (il brutto) was Eli Wallach
The bad (il cattivo) was Lee Van Cliff

The reasoning for this is because brutto ( ugly in Italian ) is almost always used to describe physical apparence, and Eli Wallach was less attractive than Lee Van Cliff. ;)


fun info.
It's Van Cleef by the way. Angel eyes....
Logged

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24928
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2016, 05:17:17 PM »
Quote from: Be There on October 07, 2016, 11:27:18 AM
he didnt have a name
clint was good
eli wallach was bad
Lee van cleef was ugly




Double check.
Think You will find the below is correct

Clint = the Good - man with no name / Blondie
Eli Wallach = The ugly / Tuco Ramirez
Lee van cleef = The Bad = Angel eyes

I've watched it enough times- ha
one of my favourite films
Logged

Kahn.N.Singh

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht
Re: Clint Eastwood
« Reply #24 on: October 07, 2016, 05:37:29 PM »
GBU, one of my faves (Wallach crushed it!). Morricone (and the Montenegro version) crushed it, too!



http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21wucy_the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-1966_shortfilms

Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »