Author Topic: President Trump  (Read 93962 times)

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #175 on: December 05, 2016, 09:03:25 AM »
Oh. My. God.  :D

https://twitter.com/gabriellahope_/status/805799075346051072

Quote
WOAH. Trump transition team announces Ivanka Trump is meeting w/ Al Gore this morning to discuss climate issues
a

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #176 on: December 05, 2016, 09:08:40 AM »


Mess with Pence, get dents!  8)
a

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #177 on: December 05, 2016, 09:54:01 AM »
Rogue electors brief Clinton camp on anti-Trump plan

Advocates of the long-shot bid to turn the Electoral College against Donald Trump have been in contact with close allies of Hillary Clinton, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions, but the Clinton camp — and Clinton herself — have declined to weigh in on the merits of the plan.

Clinton's team and the Democratic National Committee have steadfastly refused to endorse the efforts spearheaded by a group of electors in Colorado and Washington state. But, as with the ongoing recounts initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein, the Clinton team has not categorically rejected them, leaving the collection of mainly Democratic electors to push forward with no explicit public support from the failed Democratic nominee or any other prominent party leaders.

In a sign of the sensitivity of the issue, former Clinton campaign officials declined repeated requests to comment on the Electoral College effort. DNC officials also failed to respond to requests for comment.

The Clinton camp’s silence follows its cautious approach to another long-shot effort to deny Trump the presidency: the last-minute recount efforts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan launched by Stein. Stein's aggressive push has annoyed Clinton aides but has also not drawn their outward condemnation — Clinton's top campaign lawyer, Marc Elias, said in carefully chosen language last week that the campaign will “participate” in the recounts, without expanding on its plans to get involved.

"Regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself," wrote Elias.

The electors leading the anti-Trump push say they’re operating without regard to the Clinton campaign’s views and without its assistance. To some leaders of the anti-Trump effort, the lack of formal Democratic Party engagement is an asset as they attempt to woo Republicans.

“We’re really doing this on our own,” said Polly Baca, a Democratic elector from Colorado and organizer of "Hamilton Electors," the group encouraging Republican defections from Trump. “This is something we have to do as electors. This is our responsibility.”

But Clinton will not be able to avoid getting drawn into the Electoral College machinations. That’s because her husband —former President Bill Clinton — is a Democratic elector from New York. Aides to the former president have declined repeated requests for comment on whether he intends to fulfill the role or pass it to an alternate when New York’s Electoral College members convene in Albany on Dec. 19. Baca has indicated that she intends to reach out to all electors — including Clinton — for support.

Another leader of the Hamilton Electors group, Colorado elector Micheal Baca (no relation to Polly), said the group's outreach efforts were wide-ranging.

"Given what’s at stake, we have been outreaching to everyone we can including electors, various members of both parties, and the media," he said. "One of the most inspiring things about this entire process is how we have encountered such patriotism from both sides of the aisle and much willingness to unite for America."

Backers of Hamilton Electors are also preparing a wave of lawsuits challenging 29 state laws that purport to bind electors to the results of the statewide popular vote. These laws have never been enforced or tested, and many constitutional scholars believe they conflict with the Founders’ vision of the Electoral College as a deliberative body. Courtroom victories, they hope, will embolden other electors to join their cause.

All 538 members of the Electoral College will meet on Dec. 19 in their respective state capitals to cast the formal vote for president. Trump won the popular vote in states that constitute 306 electors — easily above the 270-vote threshold he needs to become president if all Republican electors support him. That’s why anti-Trump electors are working to convince at least 37 Republican electors to ditch Trump, the minimum they’d need to prevent his election. Clinton won the popular vote in states that include 232 electors.

At least eight Democratic electors are promising to defect from Clinton and support a Republican alternative to Trump. Trump won the popular vote in states that constitute 306 electors — easily above the 270-vote threshold he needs to become president if all Republican electors support him. That’s why anti-Trump electors are working to convince at least 37 Republican electors to ditch Trump and join them in support of a compromise candidate, which could send the final decision to the House of Representatives.

While Trump's lawyers have been working to stymie the recounts, his campaign has paid little attention to the Electoral College initiative. The same is true of the Clinton camp. While Clinton won the popular vote in states that include 232 electors, she would need all three recounts to overturn the Election Day results to get to 270 electoral votes — an extremely unlikely event.

Recounts aside, there’s little incentive for the Clinton camp to become involved with the anti-Trump effort since it can only result in detracting from her electoral vote total. The only reason to engage at all would in support of an effort to deny Trump an Electoral College majority.

The Democratic electors have already revealed that they’re close to a consensus pick for whom they will vote: Ohio Gov. John Kasich.


Kasich: boogers and all.

Kasich is increasingly seen as the most acceptable Republican alternative to electors on both sides of the aisle, according to multiple electors familiar with the conversations. They note that Kasich defeated Trump in Ohio's primary, that the governor boasts a high approval rating in his state and that Kasich was reportedly under consideration to be Trump's vice president before he selected Indiana Gov. Mike Pence.

"Many Electors are saying that Governor John Kasich would be best for our country. A consensus is beginning to form that Governor Kasich would be best positioned to unite America," said Micheal Baca, in a statement to POLITICO on Sunday. Other electors involved in the effort confirmed this line of thinking.

It’s unclear if Kasich would accept support from these electors, and a top political adviser downplayed the strategy.

"There's no question Trump won enough votes in the states to receive over 270 votes when the members of the Electoral College meet,” said Kasich’s top political adviser John Weaver, when asked about the prospect that some electors might vote for Kasich. “I'm sure the [Electoral College] will affirm this when it gathers later this month.”

Even if no Republicans join the recalcitrant Democrats, eight defections from Clinton would represent more “faithless electors” — members who don’t vote for their party's designated presidential candidate — than at any time in American history. Leaders of the effort claim at least one firm commitment from a Republican elector, though none have spoken out publicly.

(Politico)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #178 on: December 05, 2016, 10:02:54 AM »
OK, hon.  We'll see about reversing the results, since you don't approve.


Vintage Madonna

Madonna on the Election

Madonna is opening up about her thoughts on the election and her friends who support Donald Trump in a candid new interview with Billboard.

On the outcome of the election: “It felt like someone died. It felt like a ­combination of the heartbreak and betrayal you feel when someone you love more than anything leaves you, and also a death. I feel that way every morning; I wake up and say, ‘Oh, wait, Donald Trump is still the president,’ and it wasn’t a bad dream that I had. It feels like women betrayed us. The percentage of women who voted for Trump was insanely high.”

On why women voted for Trump: “Women hate women. That’s what I think it is. Women’s nature is not to support other women. It’s really sad. Men protect each other, and women protect their men and children. Women turn inward and men are more external. A lot of it has do with jealousy and some sort of tribal inability to accept that one of their kind could lead a nation.”

On what her friends who support Trump said: “That they would rather have a successful businessman running the country than a woman who lies. Just absurd. But people don’t have faith in government as we know it. We live in a country that’s run by ­bankers. In a way, it makes sense that Donald Trump is the president. Because money rules. Not intelligence, not experience, not a moral compass, not the ability to make wise ­decisions, not the ability to think of the future of the human race.”

(Billboard Magazine)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #179 on: December 05, 2016, 10:20:49 AM »
Oh. My. God.  :D

https://twitter.com/gabriellahope_/status/805799075346051072


Lol, yeah I saw that.  Gore huffs and puffs his way into Trump Tower:


Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #180 on: December 05, 2016, 11:17:33 AM »


Mess with Pence, get dents!  8)

I love seeing Stephanopolis get shut the fuck down.  Can't stand that guy.  Great job by Pence.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #181 on: December 05, 2016, 11:19:00 AM »


Al Gore just had ‘an extremely interesting conversation’ with Trump on climate change

As Donald Trump continues to indicate that he might be willing to change his position on climate change, which he has long called a “hoax,” the president-elect met Monday with former vice president Al Gore, who has become a prominent activist in the fight against global warming.

Gore was originally scheduled to meet just with Trump's oldest daughter, Ivanka Trump, who is not registered with a political party and has already pushed her father to adopt positions usually promoted by Democrats. Gore told reporters that after that meeting, he then had “an extremely interesting conversation” with the president-elect.

“I had a lengthy and very productive session with the president-elect. It was a sincere search for areas of common ground,” Gore told reporters after spending about 90 minutes at Trump Tower in Manhattan during the lunch hour Monday. “I had a meeting beforehand with Ivanka Trump. The bulk of the time was with the president-elect, Donald Trump. I found it an extremely interesting conversation, and to be continued, and I'm just going to leave it at that.”

(Washington Post)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #182 on: December 05, 2016, 11:39:48 AM »
Report buried Trump-related ‘hate crimes’ against white kids

(New York Post - Paul Sperry)  At least 2,000 educators around the country reported racist slurs and other derogatory language leveled against white students in the first days after Donald Trump was elected president. But the group that surveyed the teachers didn’t publish the results in its report on Trump-related “hate crimes.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center partnered with the American Federation of Teachers, which formally endorsed Hillary Clinton, to circulate the questionnaire among its 1.6 million mostly Democrat members. The survey was sent out to K-12 teachers and administrators who subscribe to its “Teaching Tolerance” newsletter.

The SPLC’s widely cited report — “The Trump Effect: The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election on Our Nation’s Schools” — reported that 40 percent of the more than 10,000 educators who responded to the survey “have heard derogatory language directed at students of color, Muslims, immigrants and people based on gender or sexual orientation.”

The takeaway was that Trump-supporting white kids have been harassing minorities at the nation’s schools. And SPLC’s schools report, along with a broader report on alleged Trump-inspired hate crimes — “Ten Days After: Harassment and Intimidation in the Aftermath of the Election” — sparked breathless coverage in the New York Times, Washington Post and other major media.

The reports also triggered a statement Friday from the US Commission on Civil Rights, which expressed “deep concern” that “prejudice has reared its ugly head in public elementary and secondary schools.” The panel called for more federal funding to prosecute “hate crimes.”

But the SPLC didn’t present the whole story. The Montgomery, Ala.-based nonprofit self-censored results from a key question it asked educators — whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: “I have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students.”

Asked last week to provide the data, SPLC initially said it was having a hard time getting the information “from the researchers.” Pressed, SPLC spokeswoman Kirsten Bokenkamp finally revealed that “about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question.”

Bokenkamp did not provide an explanation for the absence of such a substantial metric — at least 2,000 bias-related incidents against white students — from the report, which focuses instead on “anti-immigrant sentiment,” “anti-Muslim sentiment” and “slurs about students of color” related to the election.

“They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative,” former Education Department civil-rights attorney Hans Bader said. “It was deemed an inconvenient truth.”

Quote
Suppressing reports of crimes against Trump supporters gives a one-sided and misleading view of post-election discord.

Founded in 1971, SPLC claims to be a non-partisan civil-rights law firm. But it receives funding from leftist groups, including ones controlled by billionaire George Soros. And a review of Federal Election Commission records reveals that its board members have contributed more than $13,400 to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns.

Bader says SPLC has an agenda to derail the Trump administration before it starts.

“These flawed SPLC reports will be cited by left-wing special interests to try to block the confirmation of moderate and conservative people to posts such as attorney general by falsely making it look like America’s schools and streets are pervaded by bigotry,” Bader said.

Last week, SPLC held a press conference in Washington to demand Trump “reconsider” his picks for White House advisers and attorney general, and “disavow” his immigration policies.

“His own words have sparked the barrage of hate that we are seeing,” SPLC President Richard Cohen maintained. “He has been singing the white supremacist song since he came down the escalator in his tower and announced his candidacy.”

Cohen tied Trump to a number of hate crimes, which he warns will only “spike” once he’s inaugurated. He noted his center recorded 867 alleged anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and anti-black hate crimes in the 10 days following Trump’s Nov. 8 win.

But the SPLC acknowledges that it has not independently verified any of the claims. It collected most of them on its website, many anonymously.

The group won’t use its $315 million in assets to investigate the “hate crimes,” or at least help alleged victims file police reports or provide them counseling or other assistance, but it has offered “sympathy.”

“We wrote back to every submission that provided an email address to express sympathy and encourage them to report the incident to local authorities,” Bokenkamp said.

Bader pointed out that most of the anti-minority “hate crimes” and “hate incidents” cited by SPLC do not legally constitute hate crimes, and many involve constitutionally protected speech.

“It is simply ridiculous that SPLC treats ‘build the wall’ as hate rhetoric,” he said. The center counted people mentioning “build the wall” as 467 incidents of hate.

“Alas, these days the SPLC is mainly a fundraising machine,” said Gail Heriot, a US Commission on Civil Rights member who voted against Friday’s resolution. “The more it can persuade its donors that hate groups have penetrated every nook and cranny of American society, the more money it can raise. Now it wants us to believe that the election has unleashed unprecedented waves of hatred and violence among schoolchildren. Let’s stop and take a deep breath before we assume that’s true. The SPLC has no credibility with anyone — on the left or the right — who is familiar with its methods.”

While there no doubt are legitimate reports of hate crimes against minorities — and even one is too many — hyping such incidents recklessly fans the flames of anxiety among such communities. And suppressing reports of crimes against Trump supporters gives a one-sided and misleading view of post-election discord.

(New York Post.  Paul Sperry is a former Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily and the author of “Infiltration.”)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41777
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: President Trump
« Reply #183 on: December 05, 2016, 11:41:19 AM »
All the lib fags on my page have been 24/7 melt down since he was elected

Report buried Trump-related ‘hate crimes’ against white kids

(New York Post - Paul Sperry)  At least 2,000 educators around the country reported racist slurs and other derogatory language leveled against white students in the first days after Donald Trump was elected president. But the group that surveyed the teachers didn’t publish the results in its report on Trump-related “hate crimes.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center partnered with the American Federation of Teachers, which formally endorsed Hillary Clinton, to circulate the questionnaire among its 1.6 million mostly Democrat members. The survey was sent out to K-12 teachers and administrators who subscribe to its “Teaching Tolerance” newsletter.

The SPLC’s widely cited report — “The Trump Effect: The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election on Our Nation’s Schools” — reported that 40 percent of the more than 10,000 educators who responded to the survey “have heard derogatory language directed at students of color, Muslims, immigrants and people based on gender or sexual orientation.”

The takeaway was that Trump-supporting white kids have been harassing minorities at the nation’s schools. And SPLC’s schools report, along with a broader report on alleged Trump-inspired hate crimes — “Ten Days After: Harassment and Intimidation in the Aftermath of the Election” — sparked breathless coverage in the New York Times, Washington Post and other major media.

The reports also triggered a statement Friday from the US Commission on Civil Rights, which expressed “deep concern” that “prejudice has reared its ugly head in public elementary and secondary schools.” The panel called for more federal funding to prosecute “hate crimes.”

But the SPLC didn’t present the whole story. The Montgomery, Ala.-based nonprofit self-censored results from a key question it asked educators — whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: “I have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students.”

Asked last week to provide the data, SPLC initially said it was having a hard time getting the information “from the researchers.” Pressed, SPLC spokeswoman Kirsten Bokenkamp finally revealed that “about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question.”

Bokenkamp did not provide an explanation for the absence of such a substantial metric — at least 2,000 bias-related incidents against white students — from the report, which focuses instead on “anti-immigrant sentiment,” “anti-Muslim sentiment” and “slurs about students of color” related to the election.

“They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative,” former Education Department civil-rights attorney Hans Bader said. “It was deemed an inconvenient truth.”

Founded in 1971, SPLC claims to be a non-partisan civil-rights law firm. But it receives funding from leftist groups, including ones controlled by billionaire George Soros. And a review of Federal Election Commission records reveals that its board members have contributed more than $13,400 to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns.

Bader says SPLC has an agenda to derail the Trump administration before it starts.

“These flawed SPLC reports will be cited by left-wing special interests to try to block the confirmation of moderate and conservative people to posts such as attorney general by falsely making it look like America’s schools and streets are pervaded by bigotry,” Bader said.

Last week, SPLC held a press conference in Washington to demand Trump “reconsider” his picks for White House advisers and attorney general, and “disavow” his immigration policies.

“His own words have sparked the barrage of hate that we are seeing,” SPLC President Richard Cohen maintained. “He has been singing the white supremacist song since he came down the escalator in his tower and announced his candidacy.”

Cohen tied Trump to a number of hate crimes, which he warns will only “spike” once he’s inaugurated. He noted his center recorded 867 alleged anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and anti-black hate crimes in the 10 days following Trump’s Nov. 8 win.

But the SPLC acknowledges that it has not independently verified any of the claims. It collected most of them on its website, many anonymously.

The group won’t use its $315 million in assets to investigate the “hate crimes,” or at least help alleged victims file police reports or provide them counseling or other assistance, but it has offered “sympathy.”

“We wrote back to every submission that provided an email address to express sympathy and encourage them to report the incident to local authorities,” Bokenkamp said.

Bader pointed out that most of the anti-minority “hate crimes” and “hate incidents” cited by SPLC do not legally constitute hate crimes, and many involve constitutionally protected speech.

“It is simply ridiculous that SPLC treats ‘build the wall’ as hate rhetoric,” he said. The center counted people mentioning “build the wall” as 467 incidents of hate.

“Alas, these days the SPLC is mainly a fundraising machine,” said Gail Heriot, a US Commission on Civil Rights member who voted against Friday’s resolution. “The more it can persuade its donors that hate groups have penetrated every nook and cranny of American society, the more money it can raise. Now it wants us to believe that the election has unleashed unprecedented waves of hatred and violence among schoolchildren. Let’s stop and take a deep breath before we assume that’s true. The SPLC has no credibility with anyone — on the left or the right — who is familiar with its methods.”

While there no doubt are legitimate reports of hate crimes against minorities — and even one is too many — hyping such incidents recklessly fans the flames of anxiety among such communities. And suppressing reports of crimes against Trump supporters gives a one-sided and misleading view of post-election discord.

(New York Post.  Paul Sperry is a former Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily and the author of “Infiltration.”)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #184 on: December 05, 2016, 12:34:34 PM »
Don't know if I like the entire message behind the story, as to what it might say about America and us, but nonetheless very interesting.


Hillary, Chelsea, and Bill Clinton in New York on the day after the election.

Bill Clinton or Donald Trump: Who said it?

The Democrats, still reeling from their White House loss, are blaming everyone but themselves.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook believes it was the FBI directors’ fault Mrs. Clinton lost, and her communications director Jennifer Palmieri made clear she believes Donald Trump’s team stoked the flames of white supremacists, thereby leading to his victory.

What Mr. Trump did do was connect with middle-class voters in rural America — winning about one-third of the 700 counties that President Obama won twice. So in other words, Mr. Trump appealed to blue-dog Democrats, who felt their party had abandoned them.

For all those who believe Mr. Trump’s rhetoric is divisive, racist or inflammatory, really much of what he says comes from Bill Clinton’s old playbook. The Democratic Party has just become so progressive since his presidency — built on identity politics and coastal elitism — it can’t even speak to realities anymore.

Here’s a few examples of where Mr. Clinton and Mr. Trump sound almost alike — and a lesson to all those on the left who believe Mr. Trump won simply because the alt-right movement.

Immigration

Bill Clinton, in his 1995 State of the Union address, spoke about illegal immigration and didn’t mince words. He even used the word “illegal aliens,” not “undocumented”— gasp!

“All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country,” Mr. Clinton said. “The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers.

“That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens,” he said. “In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace.

“We are a nation of immigrants,” Mr. Clinton said. “But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.”

Sound familiar? Here’s Mr. Trump in his immigration-focused speech in Phoenix in August.

“If we’re going to make our immigration system work, then we have to be prepared to talk honestly and without fear about these important and very sensitive issues,” Mr. Trump said. “For instance, we have to listen to the concerns that working people, our forgotten working people, have over the record pace of immigration and its impact on their jobs, wages, housing, schools, tax bills and general living conditions.”

He proposed building a wall along the Southern border, ending catch and release, having zero tolerance for criminal aliens, blocking funding for sanctuary cities, and canceling all of Mr. Obama’s executive orders, among others.

Make America Great Again

This is Mr. Trump’s slogan, which Mr. Clinton has ridiculed as racist.

“That message where ‘I’ll give you America great again’ is if you’re a white Southerner, you know exactly what it means, don’t you?” Mr. Clinton said. “What it means is ‘I’ll give you an economy you had 50 years ago, and I’ll move you back up on the social totem pole and other people down.”

Except during Mr. Clinton’s first presidential campaign, when apparently the slogan didn’t mean that. At a 1991 campaign event in Little Rock, Arkansas, Mr. Clinton declared, “Together, we can make America great again.”

He used the same phrase again during a speech in 1992 and during a television interview that same year.

Obamacare

Speaking at a Democratic rally in Flint, Michigan, in October, Mr. Clinton had some choice words for Mr. Obama’s signature health care plan, Obamacare.

“So you’ve got this crazy system where all of a sudden 25 million more people have health care and then the people who are out there busting it, sometimes 60 hours a week, wind up with their premiums doubled and their coverage cut in half. It’s the craziest thing in the world,” Mr. Clinton said.

Yup. Mr. Trump has echoed the problems with Obamacare.

“It is going to be amazingly destructive,” Mr. Trump said in a speech kicking off his presidency in June 2015. “Doctors are quitting. I have a friend who’s a doctor, and he said to me the other day, ‘Donald, I never saw anything like it. I have more accountants than I have nurses.’ It’s a disaster. My patients are beside themselves. They had a plan that was good. They have no plan now.”

Concerns for the white working class

In a speech given at one of his wife’s fundraisers in Canton, Ohio, last year — and released by WikiLeaks — Mr. Clinton expressed disappointment that the most recent Democratic primary debate hadn’t a single mention of the fact that “84 percent of the American people, after inflation, had not had a raise of 1 cent since the financial crash.”

“And in the middle of all this we learned, breathtakingly, that middle-aged, non-college-educated white Americans’ life expectancy is going down and is now lower than Hispanics, even though they make less money,” Mr. Clinton said. “And the gap between African-Americans and whites is closing, but unfortunately not because the death rate among African-Americans is dropping but because the death rate among white Americans is rising. Why? Because they don’t have anything to look forward to when they get up in the morning. Because their lives are sort of stuck in neutral.”

That’s the exact nerve Mr. Trump hit, which helped propel him to the White House.

“My message is that things have to change — and they have to change right now,” Mr. Trump said at the Republican National Convention during his nomination acceptance speech in July. “Every day I wake up determined to deliver for the people I have met all across this nation that have been neglected, ignored and abandoned.

“I have visited the laid-off factory workers, and the communities crushed by our horrible and unfair trade deals,” he said. “These are the forgotten men and women of our country. People who work hard but no longer have a voice. I am your voice.”

And four months later, he became the president-elect.

(Washington Times)

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: President Trump
« Reply #185 on: December 05, 2016, 01:55:01 PM »
OK, hon.  We'll see about reversing the results, since you don't approve.


Vintage Madonna

Madonna on the Election

Madonna is opening up about her thoughts on the election and her friends who support Donald Trump in a candid new interview with Billboard.

On the outcome of the election: “It felt like someone died. It felt like a ­combination of the heartbreak and betrayal you feel when someone you love more than anything leaves you, and also a death. I feel that way every morning; I wake up and say, ‘Oh, wait, Donald Trump is still the president,’ and it wasn’t a bad dream that I had. It feels like women betrayed us. The percentage of women who voted for Trump was insanely high.”

On why women voted for Trump: “Women hate women. That’s what I think it is. Women’s nature is not to support other women. It’s really sad. Men protect each other, and women protect their men and children. Women turn inward and men are more external. A lot of it has do with jealousy and some sort of tribal inability to accept that one of their kind could lead a nation.”

On what her friends who support Trump said: “That they would rather have a successful businessman running the country than a woman who lies. Just absurd. But people don’t have faith in government as we know it. We live in a country that’s run by ­bankers. In a way, it makes sense that Donald Trump is the president. Because money rules. Not intelligence, not experience, not a moral compass, not the ability to make wise ­decisions, not the ability to think of the future of the human race.”

(Billboard Magazine)



LOL that old hag. Why put a pic there of her 30 years ago?

Truth is no one wanted blowjob from her.

I hate women who don't understand that women have different situations of life too. They can't all have same political views.
Delusional old bitch who has to pay for low iq men from 3rd world to fuck her. That's pretty bad for a woman.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #186 on: December 05, 2016, 02:17:38 PM »

LOL that old hag. Why put a pic there of her 30 years ago?

Truth is no one wanted blowjob from her.

I hate women who don't understand that women have different situations of life too. They can't all have same political views.
Delusional old bitch who has to pay for low iq men from 3rd world to fuck her. That's pretty bad for a woman.


Exactly.  This chick is so, so lost in delusion.

It caused me to question whether she'd done any campaigning for Hillary (other than that last-minute concert she did, day before election) and I found this from mid-October -- said at Madison Square Garden:

Quote
If you vote for Hillary Clinton I will give you a blowjob. I’m really good. I’m not a douche, and I’m not a tool. I have eye contact and I do swallow.

So that must be what you meant... I'll admit this really is news to me.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #187 on: December 05, 2016, 02:44:50 PM »
LMAO -- from Online Magazine HeatStreet:

No singing or dancing for Madonna right now as the Queen of Pop is at the forefront of manning the barricades, protesting against the election of Donald Trump.

Madonna, a big Hillary Clinton supporter, has stepped up her political activism, sharing a video of footage from the  “Love Trumps Hate” protest that occurred on Manhattan’s 5th Avenue on Instagram.

She wrote: “Need to Turn these Words into Action……….So Now What? ?????? 🙏🏻🇺🇸 Rebel ❤️’s Unite. N.Y.C. Start A Revolution of ❤️🙏🏻🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃

Her Madgesty has, not surprisingly, gone back on her pledge last month to concertgoers that, “If you vote for Hillary Clinton I will give you a blowjob.”

You might think therefore that Trump is the last person Madonna would do business with, but let Heat Street fill you in on a previous 5th Avenue happening in 2008.

Gucci and Madonna hosted a fundraising event in February 2008 to raise money for her non-profit Raising Malawi. The fundraiser coincide with the opening of the Gucci store in Trump Tower on 5th Avenue and 56th Street.

The press conference for the Gucci Flagship Store was hosted by Trump a day before Madonna’s fundraiser, which took place on the North Lawn of the UN.

Donald Trump attended together with his wife Melania, daughter Ivanka Trump, and son-in-law Jared Kushner along with celebrities including Gwyneth Paltrow, Tom Cruise, and Demi Moore.

One guest who attended, speaking on condition of anonymity, recalled seeing Trump and Madonna conversing.

At the auction to raise funds for Madonna’s Malawi foundation held during the event, Trump successfully bid $120,000 for a trip to Paris, where they would enjoy a tour of the famed Chateau Latour vineyard and have a meal with actress Salma Hayek and her husband, the French billionaire François-Henri Pinault.

Buzzfeed later reported that the cash came from Trump’s own foundation, rather than his own pocket, and that he didn’t himself subsequently go to Paris.

The pair have never been close (Madonna objected to Trump’s verbal assaults on her close pal Rosie O’Donnell, and the Donald uncharitably told ABC’s defunct talkshow Nitecap in 1992: “If Madonna were in this room, she’d be the least attractive woman here.”)

Trump resumed hostilities when he tweeted in 2012:

Quote
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Many people walked out on Madonna's concert when she told them to vote for Obama. Years ago I walked out because the concert was terrible!
12:59 PM - 29 Oct 2012

But since it’s now Madonna who is on the warpath, what better way is there to turn her “words into action” than by returning the $120,000 her foundation was given by Trump back in 2008?

(Heat Street)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #188 on: December 05, 2016, 03:02:32 PM »
2016 November 08 11:50 AM


It started with Madonna.

Now, a couple of adult film stars, Angela Castro (of a movie, or something, called Boob Science) and Maggie Green (star of Miami MILFs 2), have joined together to launch an official campaign: They say they’ll give a blow job to anyone who votes against Donald Trump in the Presidential election.

They even have a top-notch promotional video (which is obviously NSFW) filmed in someone’s apartment, in front of a closet. In it, they explain that the bargain is simple. “Vote against the orange clown,” Castro says, and the two will make good on their end of the deal, subject to a few specific provisions, including a Trump loss:

To qualify for a BJ fans must follow both Angelina Castro and Maggie Green on Twitter and vote against Trump. Details on how to collect the BJs if Trump loses the election will be posted on TeamBJ.com three days after the election day. The girls are tentatively planning Inauguration Day to deliver on their promise.

But, of course, Angela and Maggie (and Madonna, *shudder*) aside, the question is: Can you actually trade your vote for a sexual favor? The answer isn’t as clear-cut as you might think.

It’s considered a violation of Federal law to trade anything of value for a vote. According to Article 52 of the US Code, any exchange of money, goods or services for a vote—or voter registration, for that matter—is a serious offense. It’s likely, based on the law, that even the offer of payment, financial or otherwise, is likely illegal, and could lead to a Federal prison sentence of at least five years, or a fine of more than $10,000. Or both.

Another section of Federal law, though, goes a bit further in exactly what constitutes an offer for payment. 42 USCS § 1973i(c) of the U.S. Code says the bribe has to have monetary value. So while things like cold hard cash, liquor, and lottery tickets might be problematic, sexual favors might not be.

But while Madonna probably doesn’t make money on her various extracurricular activities, Angela and Maggie are part of the sex industry—and their comparative sexual prowess does happen to earn them money. I’ve never seen Miami MILFs 2, but I assume that Maggie both performed the Trump program’s signature reward on screen in it, and earned some take-home pay for it.

It is, of course, unlikely that the Justice Department is going to go after either of these adult film stars for their election-altering promises. So go for it America. Or go at it.

Or something.

(Heat Street)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #189 on: December 05, 2016, 03:58:09 PM »
 ::) Weak Ass newspaper.  Doesn't surprise me their writers are crazy.

WaPo Writer Blames Trump For Being Single

Donald Trump has been blamed for just about everything. Pundits said he would crash the market. Race hustlers said he would cause a greater rift between whites and minorities. Now, feminists are even blaming him as the reason they’ve given up on finding love.

Stephanie Land wrote in The Washington Post on Monday that she’s no longer looking for a relationship because of Trump.

“I’ve lost the desire to attempt the courtship phase. The future is uncertain. I am not the optimistic person I was on the morning of Nov. 8, wearing a T-shirt with ‘Nasty Woman’ written inside a red heart,” Land wrote in her op-ed. “It makes me want to cry thinking of that. Of seeing my oldest in the shirt I bought her in Washington, D.C., that says ‘Future President.’”

“There is no room for dating in this place of grief,” she continued. “Dating means hope. I’ve lost that hope in seeing the words ‘President-elect Trump.’”

Land said throughout the article that she was strong enough to pay her bills, raise her children, and financially support her family. But dealing with Trump’s victory? That’s a bridge too far.

Feminists love to claim that they are as strong (or stronger) than men and that they’re not some delicate flower. I am woman hear me roar — but if an election doesn’t go my way, watch me cry.

Anyone clinging to a support group for up to eight years because of something entirely out of their control shouldn’t be looking for a boyfriend. They should seek a therapist and stop blaming Trump.

(RealClearPolitics)

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: President Trump
« Reply #190 on: December 05, 2016, 04:01:50 PM »
Exactly.  This chick is so, so lost in delusion.


This explains why Madonna's MDMA Tour in 2012 only grossed $315,066,389 down from her 2009 Sticky and Sweet Tour which grossed $450,780,828 (amounts are adjusted for inflation).

I'm not one of the tour attendees. Madonna doesn't do it for me.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #191 on: December 05, 2016, 04:28:07 PM »
This explains why Madonna's MDMA Tour in 2012 only grossed $315,066,389 down from her 2009 Sticky and Sweet Tour which grossed $450,780,828 (amounts are adjusted for inflation).

I'm not one of the tour attendees. Madonna doesn't do it for me.

I don't think big $$ is a gauge-reading for absence of delusion, Prime.  Too many deluded rich people out there.

Btw, you don't seem like a Madonna-type, no.   ;D
 

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #192 on: December 05, 2016, 04:41:06 PM »
You and the other weasels will have to be angry by yourselves, little man.  No one else is buying into the drama.


Trump arrives at party Saturday night

Texas Republican elector says he won't cast ballot for Trump

By WILL WEISSERT Associated Press

A Republican member of the Electoral College from Texas said Monday that he won't cast one of his state's 38 electoral votes for Donald Trump because "I am here to elect a president, not a king."

Dallas paramedic Chris Suprun previously indicated he would support Trump. But he now says the president-elect's postelection attacks on the First Amendment and the country's electoral process, as well as the billionaire businessman's continued promotion of his brand and business interests overseas, changed his mind.

Texas law doesn't mandate that electors vote according to the results of the state's presidential election, which Trump won by nine percentage points over Hillary Clinton. Suprun and the GOP's other electors signed pledges at the state Republican convention in Dallas this summer promising to vote for their party's nominee, but those aren't legally binding.

"I'm expecting backlash, but that has been par for the course this campaign. People are unhappy. They're angry. But I'm angry, too," said Suprun, who said that prior to changing his mind he had received hundreds of emails, letters and phone calls urging him not to support Trump.

Suprun said the Electoral College system "is fine as it currently exists." His problem is just with its winner.

"I was told if we elected Donald Trump he would transform his personality into being presidential. He isn't," Suprun said. "I wanted him to be presidential, but since the election he hasn't grown into our institution, he's attacked them. I am here to elect a president, not a king."

Another Texas Republican elector, Art Sisneros, resigned last week rather than vote for Trump. Electors will vote to replace Sisneros when they convene Dec. 19 in Austin and in state capitals across the country to vote for president.

Suprun said he was not resigning but also won't be voting for Hillary Clinton.

"I am not sure of who I will vote for, but would have to strongly consider someone like (Ohio Gov. John) Kasich who has both executive and legislative experience bringing people together," he said.

Suprun said he was waiting to see if other electors will revolt and rally behind a Trump alternative like Kasich.

"I'm looking for someone we can all unify behind," he said.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42406
Re: President Trump
« Reply #193 on: December 05, 2016, 05:04:29 PM »
I don't think big $$ is a gauge-reading for absence of delusion, Prime.  Too many deluded rich people out there.

Btw, you don't seem like a Madonna-type, no.   ;D
 

Your right. Actually. I combined two statements made here about Madonna. The other one referred to her as being a hag. -Just noticing that lots of people pay good money to watch a deluded old hag act like a whore under the guise of being a performer/singer.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #194 on: December 05, 2016, 05:41:27 PM »
Your right. Actually. I combined two statements made here about Madonna. The other one referred to her as being a hag. -Just noticing that lots of people pay good money to watch a deluded old hag act like a whore under the guise of being a performer/singer.

lol!  ;D ;D ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41777
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: President Trump
« Reply #195 on: December 05, 2016, 07:09:37 PM »
I wonder what this fat pos looks like


quote author=Las Vegas link=topic=621888.msg8658632#msg8658632 date=1480982289]
 ::) Weak Ass newspaper.  Doesn't surprise me their writers are crazy.

WaPo Writer Blames Trump For Being Single

Donald Trump has been blamed for just about everything. Pundits said he would crash the market. Race hustlers said he would cause a greater rift between whites and minorities. Now, feminists are even blaming him as the reason they’ve given up on finding love.

Stephanie Land wrote in The Washington Post on Monday that she’s no longer looking for a relationship because of Trump.

“I’ve lost the desire to attempt the courtship phase. The future is uncertain. I am not the optimistic person I was on the morning of Nov. 8, wearing a T-shirt with ‘Nasty Woman’ written inside a red heart,” Land wrote in her op-ed. “It makes me want to cry thinking of that. Of seeing my oldest in the shirt I bought her in Washington, D.C., that says ‘Future President.’”

“There is no room for dating in this place of grief,” she continued. “Dating means hope. I’ve lost that hope in seeing the words ‘President-elect Trump.’”

Land said throughout the article that she was strong enough to pay her bills, raise her children, and financially support her family. But dealing with Trump’s victory? That’s a bridge too far.

Feminists love to claim that they are as strong (or stronger) than men and that they’re not some delicate flower. I am woman hear me roar — but if an election doesn’t go my way, watch me cry.

Anyone clinging to a support group for up to eight years because of something entirely out of their control shouldn’t be looking for a boyfriend. They should seek a therapist and stop blaming Trump.

(RealClearPolitics)
[/quote]

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: President Trump
« Reply #196 on: December 06, 2016, 05:59:53 AM »
Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!


 :D :D :D :D :D

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/806134244384899072
a

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #197 on: December 06, 2016, 07:29:38 PM »
I wonder what this fat pos looks like



Extra durable man-hater.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #198 on: December 07, 2016, 08:36:23 AM »
Trump ‘First Dog’: Young Barron Trump May Have Just Chosen The Family’s ‘First Dog,’ A Goldendoodle Puppy

A Trump “First Dog” may have just been chosen by the president-elect’s youngest son. 10-year-old Barron Trump was given the “golden” opportunity by his father to help select the perfect puppy as the family’s “first dog,” a Goldendoodle.

According to the Washington Post, renown Palm Beach, Florida philanthropist, Lois Pope, currently owns the potential first dog-elect. Pope advocates for veterans’ and animal causes and reveals that Donald and Barron Trump are heavily leaning toward getting the 9-week-old Golden Retriever and Poodle mix.

Pope has known Trump for over 20 years and wrote him about the Goldendoodle. When the family spent Thanksgiving at Mar-a-Lago, Pope showed the president-elect a photo of the dog. At that point, Trump told her to show the photo to Barron.

“He said, ‘Go over there and show it to Barron,'” Pope said. “He said, ‘He’s going to fall in love with him.’ He said, ‘Barron will want him.'”

As far as anyone knows, the Trumps don’t own any pets. Donald Trump will be the first president in 150 years to enter the White House without a pet unless he makes that change soon.

Pope said when Barron Trump saw the photo of the Goldendoodle, “this big smile came over his face, and it just brought tears to his eyes.”

Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks noted in an email Tuesday that “no decisions have been made” about the possible first dog. However, she’s wagering that the Trumps will give the Goldendoodle puppy his new home.

While not every president has owned a dog, they’re seen as a non-partisan representative of the acting U.S. President. Despite differing political views, a great number of American citizens will agree that fun-loving dogs bring smiles to their faces. Democrats, Republicans, and third parties alike all have animal lovers.

President Obama got a Portuguese water dog named Bo in 2009 and got another one named Sunny in 2013. The Clintons owned a chocolate Labrador named Buddy and had a cat named Socks.

What will the next first dog be named if Donald and Barron Trump take him? Pope has already named the Goldendoodle Patton after George Patton, a World War II general Trump admires.

Pope thought about Barron Trump when she selected Patton as a possible first dog. She said moving to the White House will be stressful for a young boy and bonding with a canine buddy will make the transition smoother.

“It’ll help with the transition. It’ll take away some of the wonder and awe,” said Pope. “I mean, can you imagine moving into the White House as a child? It’s hard.”

Pope didn’t disclose where the Goldendoodle came from, but reveals he has some training to go through first. For one, he needs to be potty-trained, which Pope explains they’re in the process of doing now. Patton will then have what’s referred to as “hero dog training,” a program sponsored by Life Foundation members that awards for “hero dogs” that have helped human lives. It’s intended to not only make Patton the first family’s beloved pet, but protector as well.

Pope said since Patton is part Poodle, he won’t be a problem for people with allergies. She gushes that the anticipated first dog is “incredibly cute.” The veteran and animal advocate adds that it’s going to be hard for her to let him go. She realizes it’s not a done deal just yet that Patton will be the Trump’s first dog. The report likens Trump’s decision to appoint the Goldendoodle as first dog to that of appointing the next secretary of state — he’s still “weighing” that out.

As hard as it’ll be for Pope to see Patton go, she feels Barron Trump is more important than her keeping the Goldendoodle. Surely, she’ll still see him if he becomes the nation’s next “first dog.”

(Inquistr)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #199 on: December 07, 2016, 08:46:59 AM »
Where are the Loyalists?

As President-elect Donald Trump puts together his White House team and makes his Cabinet picks, he has tapped governors, business executives and retired military officers, but there’s one group largely absent from the his appointments so far: longtime Trump loyalists.

With the exception of Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who supported Trump early and landed the nomination for attorney general, Trump’s highest-profile political supporters during the campaign — Chris Christie, Rudy Giuliani and Newt Gingrich — are all, at least for now, without any known role in the incoming Trump administration.

The same is true for those who ran Trump’s campaign during the first months of the Republican primaries.

Until Trump started winning primaries, his campaign was run by a small band of dedicated loyalists including former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, spokesperson Hope Hicks, social media guru Dan Scavino, former political director Michael Glassner and Iowa state director Chuck Laudner. So far, none of them have been publicly offered jobs in the administration.

Meanwhile, Trump’s Cabinet picks have included people who opposed him during the Republican primaries, including Gov. Nikki Haley, R-S.C. (U.N. ambassador), and Betsy DeVos (education). His pick for deputy commerce secretary, Cubs co-owner Todd Ricketts, even funded a super PAC that ran ads attacking Trump during the primaries.

(ABC)