Author Topic: President Trump  (Read 83930 times)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #450 on: December 25, 2016, 01:28:52 PM »
Donald Trump Family Christmas Is Full Of Work, Vladimir Putin, ‘Savage Kids,’ Nutcracker Memories, Beaches, Boating and Hannukah

(Inquistr) The Trump family is having a busy Christmas and holiday season.

While siblings Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump have been tweeting pics of their far-flung Christmas festivities, President-elect Donald Trump was still working on Christmas Eve. As usual, some of the elder Trump’s efforts have been raising a few eyebrows, but he might get a few good marks for other recent endeavors.

On Christmas Eve the President-elect announced that he will be dissolving his nonprofit charity the Donald J. Trump Foundation. As the Inquisitr previously reported, the foundation has been under investigation in relation to accusations that it used donated funds to cover lawsuits for Donald Trump’s for-profit businesses. That investigation is still ongoing with with the New York Attorney General’s office, but critics viewed the organization as a potential conflict of interest for the incoming president. Trump cannot dissolve the Trump Foundation until the investigation is complete, but his lawyers have supposedly already begun getting things in order to do so.

On Friday, Donald Trump tweeted that his son, Eric, would also be ceasing his fundraising work with cancer charities because of potential conflicts of interests.

While severing ties to organizations — nonprofit or otherwise — that could raise ethical questions should be par for the course for an incoming president, the Trumps nevertheless deserve some credit for doing so.

Any good will those steps may have earned from critics and opponents, however, may have very likely been quashed by some misguided praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin from Donald Trump.

In a tweet sent out Friday, Trump quoted Putin for criticizing former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party because they’ve raised questions about Trump’s relationship with Putin in regards to the Russian government having possibly hacked into the Democratic National Committee’s email servers in the weeks prior to the election.

Quote
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Vladimir Putin said today about Hillary and Dems: "In my opinion, it is humiliating. One must be able to lose with dignity." So true!
6:13 PM - 23 Dec 2016

More: http://www.inquisitr.com/3825677/donald-trump-family-christmas-is-full-of-work-vladimir-putin-savage-kids-nutcracker-memories-beaches-boating-and-hannukah/

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #451 on: December 25, 2016, 01:56:27 PM »


Lockheed Martin CEO promises Trump she’ll cut F-35 costs, possibly saving thousands of Conn. jobs

NEW YORK — Lockheed Martin’s CEO gave President-elect Donald Trump her “personal commitment” to cut the cost of the stealthy F-35 fighter jet.

Marillyn Hewson said she had a “very good conversation” with Trump Friday, the day after he tweeted that he was considering replacing the costly F-35 Joint Strike Fighter with a modified version of a cheaper jet.

“I’ve heard his message loud and clear about reducing the cost of the F-35,” Hewson said in a statement. “I gave him my personal commitment to drive the cost down aggressively.”

She added, “We’re ready to deliver.”

F-35 engines are built in Middletown, Connecticut, and West Palm Beach, Florida. Sen. Richard Blumenthal spoke to FOX 61 on Friday about the ramifications ending the program would have in Connecticut.

“Ending or reducing the production of the F-35 is not only bad for national security and increases the cost of each plane, but also, it will mean jobs — losses of job for Connecticut, as well as losses in air superiority. Our troops should never face a fair fight,” Blumenthal said. “What reducing or ending our program would mean for Connecticut is not a few jobs, it’s thousands and thousands of jobs that we’ve worked and fought to achieve.”

Earlier in the week, Trump extracted a promise from Boeing’s Dennis Muilenburg to lower the cost of building new Air Force One jets after Trump said estimated costs were “out of control.”

Trump has pitted aerospace giants Lockheed Martin and Boeing against each other by suggesting Thursday the F-35 could be replaced with Boeing’s F-18 Super Hornet.

“Based on the tremendous cost and cost overruns of the Lockheed Martin F-35 I have asked Boeing to price-out a comparable F-18 Super Hornet!” Trump tweeted.

Blumenthal commented on the newborn competition, saying, “Phasing out the (F-35) program and adopting F-18 not only deprives Connecticut of jobs, it deprives our nation of air superiority.”

Trump’s message about a need to reduce costs followed a Wednesday meeting with Hewson and Muilenburg to discuss their respective government deals.

Hewson said at the time that the conversation was “productive,” and that she had “conveyed our continued commitment to delivering an affordable aircraft to our U.S. military and our allies.”

The president-elect, however, told members of the press that he was concerned over the F-35’s price tag.

“It’s a little bit of a dance. But we’re going to get the cost down,” he said, calling the F-35 program “very, very—uhhh—expensive.”

The F-35 is the Pentagon’s largest single program, and is likely to cost the government around $400 billion over the next 22 years.

Still, BLumenthal thinks that with the right briefings, Trump would see the necessity of the F-35 program. “The idea that we’re gonna substitute the F18, which is a fourth-generation fighter, for a plane with the stealth and strength of an F-35 seems pretty misguided.”

(FOX-61)



Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #452 on: December 25, 2016, 04:43:23 PM »
Trump White House Communications Director Jason Miller Resigns In The Midst Of An Apparent Adultery Scandal

(Uproxx) Just days after he was named Donald Trump’s White House communications director, Jason Miller has refused the job and stepped back from the Trump team. His departure from the administration is apparently related to Miller’s needs to focus on his family according to his official statement, but other details reportedly indicate there may be a more salacious reason.

Miller’s statement explains his reluctance to take on the job is due to his wife’s pregnancy with their second child according to the Daily News:

Quote
“It’s clear they need to be my top priority right now, and this is not the time to start a new job as demanding as White House communications director,”

This would all be fine if not for a series of deleted tweets from Trump surrogate and transition adviser A.J. Delgado. The posts allege that Miller may have been involved in an adulterous relationship with Delgado and that it could be the reason that Miller was stepping down from the position just two days after it was announced.

Quote
“Congratulations to the baby-daddy on being named WH Comms Director!” she wrote in one now-deleted tweet.

“The 2016 version of John Edwards,” she wrote in another, referring to the disgraced ex-Democratic senator who fathered a child with his mistress.



Delgado’s Twitter account has since been deleted, but most of the messages have been captured and saved at this point. Nothing posted online goes away forever, especially when they’re connected to an alleged sex scandal. The Miami lawyer apparently called on Miller to resign ahead of the Trump transition team announcement which did not happen, leading to the situation that played out on Saturday.

This isn’t the first time that the pair were in the headlines connected to behavior away from the campaign. Ahead of the final debate with Hillary Clinton in Las Vegas, the pair were part of a group from Trump’s campaign that entertained members of the media at a strip club the night before according to Page Six:

Quote
Sources said that Trump campaign senior communications adviser Jason Miller — along with female colleagues including senior adviser and surrogate A.J. Delgado and deputy communications director Jessica Ditto — went with several members of the media from networks, including CNN, NBC and ABC, to Sapphire Las Vegas Strip Club before the big night.

With “70,000 square feet of topless entertainment and serving the finest variety of cocktails,” Sin City’s Sapphire bills itself as the largest strip club in the world.

This trip was called a “serious lapse in judgment” by some insiders, but it’s likely that the latest allegations would shadow that.

(Via Daily News / Page Six / Mediaite)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #453 on: December 25, 2016, 07:28:40 PM »
I'm glad the establishment is against him.  Not at all bad, really.

Donald Trump Inauguration Ceremony In The Soup As A-List Entertainers Plan Anti-Trump ‘Freedom Concert’

(Inquistr) President-elect Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day plans could be spoiled thanks to a bunch of celebrities reportedly planning an anti-Trump “Freedom Concert” to register their protest against his presidency on the same day he is set to take over the reins from outgoing President Barack Obama.

Over the course of the last few weeks, several celebrities have been approached to perform at Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day ceremony on January 20, 2017. But most of the entertainers approached by the Trump transition team have turned down the offer to perform at his Inauguration because of political and personal discrepancies with the new President-elect. In such a scenario, as The Wrap reported, Trump’s team have allegedly taken an unconventional route to try and populate the ceremony with A-list stars.

“They are willing to pay anything,” one source told the media outlet.

Usually, entertainers don’t charge for performing at a presidential inauguration because it is considered honorable to perform at a presidential event, but with Trump, even promises of huge money do not seem enough to convince A-list stars to perform at Trump’s Inauguration.

The desperation seems to have hit the Trump team so hard that his former campaign manager and now adviser Kellyanne Conway recently took to national television to make a plea to Justin Timberlake and Bruno Mars, asking them to call her to be part of the festivities, according to CNN.

But despite everything, not many celebrities seem willing to perform at Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day event. As AV Club reported, Ted Nugent and Kid Rock are the only musicians willing to perform at the event at this point, with 16-year-old American Idol runner-up Jackie Evancho having been confirmed as the singer who will sing the National Anthem. The Inquisitr had earlier reported that famed tenor Andrea Bocelli, who was rumored to be one of the performers at Trump’s Inauguration ceremony, backed off after a fierce social media backlash. In fact, just this last Thursday, it was confirmed that dancers with The Radio City Rockettes would perform at the event, but now BBC is reporting that the dancers have refused to take part at Donald Trump’s event.

“I usually don’t use social media to make a political stand but I feel overwhelmed with emotion,” Phoebe Pearl, a member of the Rockettes, wrote on Instagram.

Quote
“The women I work with are intelligent and are full of love and the decision of performing for a man that stands for everything we’re against is appalling.”

More: http://www.inquisitr.com/3825297/donald-trump-inauguration-ceremony-in-the-soup-as-a-list-entertainers-plan-anti-trump-freedom-concert/

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #454 on: December 25, 2016, 10:16:45 PM »
God I love this country.

ONLY IN AMERICA
could a serial bankrupt pass himself off as a successful businessman. (And almost none of those he bankrupted were even regular businesses. They were casinos - where people essentially come to lose their money.)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59986
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: President Trump
« Reply #455 on: December 25, 2016, 10:27:23 PM »
God I love this country.

ONLY IN AMERICA could a serial bankrupt pass himself off as a successful businessman. (And almost none of those he bankrupted were even regular businesses. They were casinos - where people essentially come to lose their money.)

Serial bankruptcies? Ok, you're trolling now. If not you're completely clueless.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59986
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: President Trump
« Reply #456 on: December 25, 2016, 10:38:33 PM »
God I love this country.

ONLY IN AMERICA could a serial bankrupt pass himself off as a successful businessman. (And almost none of those he bankrupted were even regular businesses. They were casinos - where people essentially come to lose their money.)

Btw, if you think that four or five bankruptcies compared to the hundreds of business with his name on them are bad, you're once again, clueless.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #457 on: December 25, 2016, 10:48:27 PM »
Btw, if you think that four or five bankruptcies compared to the hundreds of business with his name on them are bad, you're once again, clueless.

ONLY IN AMERICA could a man who offended Hispanics, Muslims, Jews and African Americans, as well as women, babies and the handicapped become the Republican nominee for President.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #458 on: December 25, 2016, 10:58:15 PM »
Serial bankruptcies? Ok, you're trolling now. If not you're completely clueless.

Serial: occurring in a series rather than simultaneously:
serial marriage; serial murders, serial bankruptcies.

A general rule of thumb is that less than 10 people out of every 1000 in the USA file bankruptcy.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59986
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: President Trump
« Reply #459 on: December 25, 2016, 11:10:58 PM »
ONLY IN AMERICA could a man who offended Hispanics, Muslims, Jews and African Americans, as well as women, babies and the handicapped become the Republican nominee for President.

Only in America is where we can 56 different gender types and no matter what anyone says they'll get offended.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #460 on: December 25, 2016, 11:14:05 PM »
ONLY IN AMERICA could a man for whom truth is an inconvenient concept refer to his opponent as "lying" and "crooked."

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15998
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: President Trump
« Reply #461 on: December 25, 2016, 11:23:15 PM »
ONLY IN AMERICA could a man for whom truth is an inconvenient concept refer to his opponent as "lying" and "crooked."

I'll spare you (and us and everyone else) the rest: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/11/graydon-carter-donald-trump-president

Btw, only in America could someone not only get away with crime but also be dubbed "the most qualified candidate since Washington". (Not to mention she was probably the only presidential candidate who was investigated by the FBI up to the elections - and possibly still being investigated.) Or the woman who called blacks "superpredators" be considered the "non racist" candidate. The list goes on. These were probably the most disappointing candidates to run for office.



Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59986
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: President Trump
« Reply #462 on: December 25, 2016, 11:23:35 PM »
ONLY IN AMERICA could a man for whom truth is an inconvenient concept refer to his opponent as "lying" and "crooked."

Holy shit, are we going to re-live this again by pointing hard facts that completely refute anything you think? Seriously, your party got your asses handed to you based on hard facts and evidence that CANNOT be refuted with any credibility. Not kidding. You didn't read a GD thing put out by wikileaks or project Veritas did you? I want this answered. I want you to be honest by saying you really did not read anything on this....did you?

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #463 on: December 25, 2016, 11:30:08 PM »
I'll spare you (and us and everyone else) the rest: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/11/graydon-carter-donald-trump-president

Btw, only in America could someone not only get away with crime but also be dubbed "the most qualified candidate since Washington". (Not to mention she was probably the only presidential candidate who was investigated by the FBI up to the elections - and possibly still being investigated.) Or the woman who called blacks "superpredators" be considered the "non racist" candidate. The list goes on. These were probably the most disappointing candidates to run for office.




They were the most disappointing candidates to run for office in our lifetimes to date. I'm not surprised though, It's a thankless job that no one in their right mind would seek, unless their enormous ego has blinded them.

Come on, the ONLY IN AMERICA tidbits are humorous. I'm not suggesting they will open closed eyes, because it will take more than this to make that happen. Maybe something like Trump's campaign promise to create jobs by fixing our obsolete and broken infrastructure which he is now saying will be on the back burner for at least the next couple of years. Prediction: he will never follow through on it. The crumbling infrastructure will continue to crumble and those new jobs will not be created.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40965
Re: President Trump
« Reply #464 on: December 25, 2016, 11:43:50 PM »
ONLY IN AMERICA, a nation built on a history of immigration, could a man who married two immigrants -- one of whom is alleged to have worked illegally when she first arrived -- run on an anti-immigration platform.

Slapper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4299
  • Vincit qui se vincit
Re: President Trump
« Reply #465 on: December 26, 2016, 04:59:54 AM »
ONLY IN AMERICA, a nation built on a history of immigration, could a man who married two immigrants -- one of whom is alleged to have worked illegally when she first arrived -- run on an anti-immigration platform.

You folks seem to miss the point big time. You don't get it: The American Dream is dead. People voting for Trump voted for a guy who is on record saying that he is going to bring back the American Dream.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #466 on: December 26, 2016, 08:52:02 AM »


The Wait is Over: Trump Announces Who Will Write his Inauguration Speech

(politistick) The inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States is just about 4 weeks away. When he is inaugurated, Trump will make history as the first person to serve as president who has never held an elected office or been in the military. So, who will write the speech for that monumental occasion? Trump has announced that Stephen Miller, his senior White House advisor for policy, will author his inauguration speech.

This will not be a new venture for Miller, who has written the majority of Trump’s past speeches including his speech to accept the nomination at the Republican National Convention.

In regards to the theme or focus of Trump’s inauguration speech, exactly what should we expect? Former White House speechwriter for George W. Bush, Peter Wehner, speaking with Politico said that the tone of it should be different than that of Trump’s campaign.

Quote
“A campaign message is taking place in the context of a conflict and you have an opponent and you’re trying to defeat that person, [while] an inaugural speech is the exact opposite of that. That’s the one moment where you really need to go in the opposite direction and try to bring the country together.”

The Trump campaign has indicated that they may follow such a theme and shift away from his “I alone can fix it” message which was stated frequently during his campaign. Trump, who is viewed as more of a populist than a conservative, may also capitalize on his populism theme and being “an outsider” by presenting himself as “the people’s president.” This message may not be delivered just in words but also in action. Trump may wade into the crowd or join the parade rather than immediately go to the traditional congressional lunch after his swearing in.

Miller, who was previously a top aide to Trump’s attorney general pick, Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions, was instrumental in Trump’s overall campaign theme and agenda focus of “America First” which resonated widely with the American people.

(politistick)

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: President Trump
« Reply #467 on: December 26, 2016, 08:58:29 AM »
You folks seem to miss the point big time. You don't get it: The American Dream is dead. People voting for Trump voted for a guy who is on record saying that he is going to bring back the American Dream.


The live in a bubble.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #468 on: December 26, 2016, 08:59:46 AM »


Hello from across the aisle: Meet Emma, a transgender woman who voted for Trump

"Am I glad this election is over?” Emma Olson, a 27-year-old transgender woman from Minnesota, asks herself on a cold December night. “Hell yeah! Ugh, there was so much drama and arguing. I didn’t like it!”

It’s been a month-and-a-half since the election, and Emma is still reeling–but not in the way you may think. Why? Because she voted for Donald Trump, a fact she proudly boasted in a Reddit post days after the election.

“By no means do I think he is an ‘ideal’ candidate, and yeah, I disagree with some of the things he’s said and done in the past,” she tells Queerty. “But put that up against all the things that Clinton has done and it doesn’t even compare.”

We sat down with Emma to discuss exactly why she voted for Trump, what she thinks about his increasingly anti-LGBTQ cabinet picks, the impact she believes Trump could have on her as a trans woman and more…

First things first, what led you to vote for Trump?

Mostly it came down to a culmination of many months of research, comparing Clinton versus Trump. I want to stress the fact that being transgender did not play that large of a role in who I voted for. Sure, it played some part in it, but I didn’t feel right putting my support behind someone based on one small part of who I am. I instead chose to focus on the larger picture.

Personally, I just have a trust issue when it comes to believing Clinton will do the things she says she will do. She may today support the public’s support on a topic that most would agree on, but what about when she goes into private meetings with lobbyists and other powerful people in government? The next week she may completely flop on her support.

More: https://www.queerty.com/hello-across-aisle-meet-emma-transgender-woman-voted-trump-20161226

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #469 on: December 26, 2016, 09:02:55 AM »
ONLY IN AMERICA could a man who offended Hispanics, Muslims, Jews and African Americans, as well as women, babies and the handicapped become the Republican nominee for President.

Lol, Prime  ;D ;D ;D

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #470 on: December 26, 2016, 09:09:34 AM »
President-elect Donald Trump could soon make over 100 judicial appointments

(CBS) President-elect Donald Trump will likely have the chance to make over 100 judicial appointments, the Washington Post reports.

Mr. Trump will inherit an estimated 103 such vacancies throughout federal and district courts, allowing him and his Republican allies to reshape the judiciary with dozens of lifetime appointments. President Barack Obama only inherited 54 such vacancies from his predecessor, President George W. Bush.

The prospect of judicial appointments is thought to have helped mobilize Republicans behind Mr. Trump, particularly among conservative evangelical Christians.

This is particularly true when it comes to the Supreme Court, where Mr. Trump will nominate the successor to Justice Antonin Scalia, who died earlier this year. Mr. Obama’s choice for that position, Judge Merrick Garland, never saw his nomination brought to a vote by the GOP-controlled Senate.

During the campaign, Mr. Trump released two lists of conservative legal figures who could replace Scalia. Mr. Trump promised to appoint a justice in the mold of Scalia, and personally mentioned judges Diane Sykes and Bill Pryor, two well-known conservative jurists, as possibilities to fill the slot.

Democrats say that the high number of judicial appointments Mr. Trump has inherited is due to an unprecedented level of obstructionism by the Republican Congress.

“Republican tactics have been shameful and will forever leave a stain on the United States Senate,” said White House spokesman Eric Schultz. “Republican congressional dysfunction has now metastasized to the third branch of government, and that is not a legacy to be proud of.”

Republicans, meanwhile, are optimistic Mr. Trump will appoint judges who will reflect conservative opinions on a wide array of issues, from gun control and abortion access to regulatory reform.

More: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-elect-donald-trump-could-make-over-100-judicial-appointments/

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #471 on: December 26, 2016, 09:11:36 AM »
Only in America is where we can 56 different gender types and no matter what anyone says they'll get offended.

Lol, exactly.

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: President Trump
« Reply #472 on: December 26, 2016, 09:15:59 AM »
President-elect Donald Trump could soon make over 100 judicial appointments

(CBS) President-elect Donald Trump will likely have the chance to make over 100 judicial appointments, the Washington Post reports.

Mr. Trump will inherit an estimated 103 such vacancies throughout federal and district courts, allowing him and his Republican allies to reshape the judiciary with dozens of lifetime appointments. President Barack Obama only inherited 54 such vacancies from his predecessor, President George W. Bush.

The prospect of judicial appointments is thought to have helped mobilize Republicans behind Mr. Trump, particularly among conservative evangelical Christians.

This is particularly true when it comes to the Supreme Court, where Mr. Trump will nominate the successor to Justice Antonin Scalia, who died earlier this year. Mr. Obama’s choice for that position, Judge Merrick Garland, never saw his nomination brought to a vote by the GOP-controlled Senate.

During the campaign, Mr. Trump released two lists of conservative legal figures who could replace Scalia. Mr. Trump promised to appoint a justice in the mold of Scalia, and personally mentioned judges Diane Sykes and Bill Pryor, two well-known conservative jurists, as possibilities to fill the slot.

Democrats say that the high number of judicial appointments Mr. Trump has inherited is due to an unprecedented level of obstructionism by the Republican Congress.

“Republican tactics have been shameful and will forever leave a stain on the United States Senate,” said White House spokesman Eric Schultz. “Republican congressional dysfunction has now metastasized to the third branch of government, and that is not a legacy to be proud of.”

Republicans, meanwhile, are optimistic Mr. Trump will appoint judges who will reflect conservative opinions on a wide array of issues, from gun control and abortion access to regulatory reform.

More: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-elect-donald-trump-could-make-over-100-judicial-appointments/


Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #473 on: December 26, 2016, 09:56:26 AM »
God I love this country.

ONLY IN AMERICA
could a serial bankrupt pass himself off as a successful businessman. (And almost none of those he bankrupted were even regular businesses. They were casinos - where people essentially come to lose their money.)

Casinos would be a tough long haul, for sure, IMO.  They are impacted by almost everything surrounding them, in nearly every aspect imaginable, which makes them subject to too many things out of their control.  And it MUST remain a very active environment or it'll fail.

When everything is thriving, they can pay out close to 100% of what they take in.  And they'll still make a killing.  Gaming stays active and the $$ is good.  Guests are winning and they love it.

But as activity slows, the percentage of "payback" must decline to make up for it.  The guys running the casinos are the ones with the big $$, so they will see that any laws which need to be loosened to do that, are handled.  But it reaches a point in which failure is guaranteed, and nothing will stop it.

A casino would be a great business in a thriving environment, but an almost-sure fail in a slow one, iow.  

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: President Trump
« Reply #474 on: December 26, 2016, 10:27:58 AM »
Trump poised for cost-cutting battle with defense contractors

President-elect Donald Trump’s preemptive strike on the price tag of two major projects with leading defense contractors has fiscal hawks hopeful the incoming administration can rein in Pentagon contract costs even as Trump vows to invest in rebuilding the U.S. military.

“I hope this will be an opportunity to look at the Pentagon more clearly from someone who has not been part of the system,” Mandy Smithberger, director of military reform for the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), told FoxNews.com.

Since early December, Trump has been browbeating Boeing and Lockheed Martin over the costs of the next Air Force One and the F-35, respectively.

“I don't need a $4.2 billion airplane to fly around in,” Trump told “Fox News Sunday” earlier this month, referring to Air Force One.

His criticism led to meetings last week with Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg and Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson.

Muilenburg afterward committed to deliver the next Air Force One for far less than $4 billion. Trump then turned up the heat on Lockheed, tweeting, “Based on the tremendous cost and cost overruns of the Lockheed Martin F-35, I have asked Boeing to price-out a comparable F-18 Super Hornet!”

Hewson put out a statement Friday, after another conversation with Trump, saying she heard his message “loud and clear.”

More: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/26/trump-poised-for-cost-cutting-battle-with-defense-contractors.html